Comments on: City Place PUD Fails http://annarborchronicle.com/2009/01/06/city-place-pud-fails/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=city-place-pud-fails it's like being there Tue, 16 Sep 2014 04:56:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2 By: Stew Nelson http://annarborchronicle.com/2009/01/06/city-place-pud-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-5207 Stew Nelson Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:11:28 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=11291#comment-5207 Maybe we should change it to FUD? Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt.

]]>
By: Dave Askins http://annarborchronicle.com/2009/01/06/city-place-pud-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-5138 Dave Askins Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:06:57 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=11291#comment-5138 Duane,

The letters stand for “planned unit development.” It’s a mechanism by which a project, which does not conform to the existing zoning standards, can still be approved if in the judgment of city council, there is sufficient public benefit from the project to compensate for the harm it causes by not meeting the existing zoning standards.

The earlier caucus preview article gives a bit more insight, but here’s the relevant code definition:

5:10.27. PUD planned unit development district. (1) Intent. The purpose of this district is to permit flexibility in the regulation of land development; to encourage innovation in land use and variety in design, layout and type of structures constructed; to achieve economy and efficiency in the use of land, natural resources, energy and the provision of public services and utilities; to encourage provision of usable open space and protection of natural features; to provide adequate housing, employment and shopping opportunities particularly suited to the needs of the residents of the city; to expand the supply of affordable housing for lower income households and to encourage the use, reuse and improvement of existing sites and buildings which will be developed in a compatible way with surrounding uses but where the uniform regulations contained in other zoning districts do not provide adequate protections and safeguards for the site or surrounding area. The district is intended to accommodate developments with one or more land uses, sites with unusual topography or unique settings within the community or sites which exhibit difficult or costly development problems or any combination of these factors. This zoning district shall not be allowed where this zoning classification is sought primarily to avoid the imposition of standards and requirements of other zoning classifications or other city regulations rather than to achieve the stated purposes above.

]]>
By: Duane Collicott http://annarborchronicle.com/2009/01/06/city-place-pud-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-5137 Duane Collicott Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:57:39 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=11291#comment-5137 What’s a PUD?

]]>
By: Bob Martel http://annarborchronicle.com/2009/01/06/city-place-pud-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-5084 Bob Martel Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:47:23 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=11291#comment-5084 Ah, I see. Thanks for the clarification, Bob.

]]>
By: Bob Dively http://annarborchronicle.com/2009/01/06/city-place-pud-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-5082 Bob Dively Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:25:11 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=11291#comment-5082 You’re thinking of the 415 W. Washington project. City Place is the proposed apartment building on S. Fifth.

]]>
By: Bob Martel http://annarborchronicle.com/2009/01/06/city-place-pud-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-5066 Bob Martel Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:05:43 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=11291#comment-5066 Good, I’m glad they did this. I always thought that this property should be a purely public facility like a park or green way with a rail stop should that ever materialize. We won’t need any more condos downtown for quite some time.

]]>