Comments on: Jackson & Maple http://annarborchronicle.com/2010/01/19/jackson-maple-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=jackson-maple-2 it's like being there Tue, 16 Sep 2014 04:56:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2 By: Rod Johnson http://annarborchronicle.com/2010/01/19/jackson-maple-2/comment-page-1/#comment-38002 Rod Johnson Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:02:48 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=36249#comment-38002 “Bill Knapp moment” belongs with “bagel-industrial complex” in some kind of “Tlön, Uqbar, Orbus Tertius” lexicon of things people *should* say every day.

]]>
By: Tom Brandt http://annarborchronicle.com/2010/01/19/jackson-maple-2/comment-page-1/#comment-37989 Tom Brandt Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:53:48 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=36249#comment-37989 “Bill Knapp moment”. I will hang on to that one.

]]>
By: anna ercoli schnitzer http://annarborchronicle.com/2010/01/19/jackson-maple-2/comment-page-1/#comment-37984 anna ercoli schnitzer Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:32:11 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=36249#comment-37984 A deli that was perceived as being “Too Jewish”??!!! Now that is Too Funny!

]]>
By: ulotrichous http://annarborchronicle.com/2010/01/19/jackson-maple-2/comment-page-1/#comment-37957 ulotrichous Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:14:27 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=36249#comment-37957 Once I was an antideSchlotzkelizationist too. I enjoyed the unusual pizza-like products and the unique spongy bread. Tasty. Then, came the great blunder; Schlotzky’s Bill Knapp moment if you will; when they hired somebody’s cousin to come up with a new tag line to address their brand challenge:

“Schlotzky’s: Funny Name, Serious Sandwich.”

I could not help but read this as “Semitic Name, Protestant Sandwich.” Somewhere, in some meeting, someone threw out the idea that perhaps their Deli was perceived as Too Jewish, and that it was standing in the way of their expansion. So I say, bring on the deschlotzkelizationists! Down with antideschlotzkelizationalism!

Plus, there’s nothing serious about those sandwiches. That dang spongy bun is fundamentally preposterous.

]]>
By: Fred Zimmerman http://annarborchronicle.com/2010/01/19/jackson-maple-2/comment-page-1/#comment-37953 Fred Zimmerman Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:02:57 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=36249#comment-37953 If I remember correctly, Walgreen’s is planning to put a store there, so deSchlotzkelizationists, be careful what you wish for.

I guess that makes me an antideSchlotzkelizationist, and my movement would be antideSchlotzkelizationistism.

]]>
By: Rod Johnson http://annarborchronicle.com/2010/01/19/jackson-maple-2/comment-page-1/#comment-37920 Rod Johnson Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:47:26 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=36249#comment-37920 Philistines!

]]>
By: Cosmonican http://annarborchronicle.com/2010/01/19/jackson-maple-2/comment-page-1/#comment-37911 Cosmonican Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:03:04 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=36249#comment-37911 I vote for “Schlotzkelization” with its implied relationship to “proselytization”. Using an “I” instead of a “Y” can be left to personal preference can it not?

]]>
By: Rod Johnson http://annarborchronicle.com/2010/01/19/jackson-maple-2/comment-page-1/#comment-37885 Rod Johnson Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:29:56 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=36249#comment-37885 I’m casting my vote for “Schotzkification.”

]]>
By: ulotrichous http://annarborchronicle.com/2010/01/19/jackson-maple-2/comment-page-1/#comment-37875 ulotrichous Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:12:25 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=36249#comment-37875 Well, “Schlotzkyzation” just didn’t sound right.

]]>
By: Rod Johnson http://annarborchronicle.com/2010/01/19/jackson-maple-2/comment-page-1/#comment-37867 Rod Johnson Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:05:21 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=36249#comment-37867 “de-Schlotzkelization”? Where’d that intrusive l come from? (ulotrichous–mefi high five)

]]>