﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dispute over Superior Township Settlement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://annarborchronicle.com/2010/01/26/dispute-over-superior-township-settlement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://annarborchronicle.com/2010/01/26/dispute-over-superior-township-settlement/</link>
	<description>it&#039;s like being there</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 19:33:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Q.</title>
		<link>http://annarborchronicle.com/2010/01/26/dispute-over-superior-township-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-38547</link>
		<dc:creator>John Q.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=36358#comment-38547</guid>
		<description>The other problem is that the DEQ (now DNRE) will greenlight private sewage treatment plants even when they are contrary to the township&#039;s master plan. That allows developers to develop land that would otherwise be undevelopable. It also gives them leverage in court to pursue a takings claim against the township for exclusionary zoning. Even if the township wins the court case, they likely won&#039;t be awarded court costs and the attorney fees pile up quickly. The township likely saw this as the best alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other problem is that the DEQ (now DNRE) will greenlight private sewage treatment plants even when they are contrary to the township&#8217;s master plan. That allows developers to develop land that would otherwise be undevelopable. It also gives them leverage in court to pursue a takings claim against the township for exclusionary zoning. Even if the township wins the court case, they likely won&#8217;t be awarded court costs and the attorney fees pile up quickly. The township likely saw this as the best alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivienne Armentrout</title>
		<link>http://annarborchronicle.com/2010/01/26/dispute-over-superior-township-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-38474</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivienne Armentrout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=36358#comment-38474</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve known Bill McFarlane for some years and I&#039;m guessing that if he says this settlement is the best the township can do, he is right.  Unfortunately, suits over unfavorable zoning are quite common in Michigan and large-lot, agricultural zoning has often been viewed as a &quot;holding&quot; zoning.  Michigan law is not very helpful to municipalities trying to impose use restrictions.  You&#039;ll note that Ann Arbor has settled a number of lawsuits on land use and regulations, including the infamous Glen Ann case.  Superior Township has been one of the most (or the most) successful townships at enforcing a low-growth strategy in the county.  Don&#039;t forget that they are our bulwark against the spread of sprawl from Canton Township.

I&#039;d like to add that I am a member of the SEMLC and they have done a sterling job of giving us a &quot;green zone&quot;, again between us and the sprawl.  We are fortunate in having this area as a retreat now and in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve known Bill McFarlane for some years and I&#8217;m guessing that if he says this settlement is the best the township can do, he is right.  Unfortunately, suits over unfavorable zoning are quite common in Michigan and large-lot, agricultural zoning has often been viewed as a &#8220;holding&#8221; zoning.  Michigan law is not very helpful to municipalities trying to impose use restrictions.  You&#8217;ll note that Ann Arbor has settled a number of lawsuits on land use and regulations, including the infamous Glen Ann case.  Superior Township has been one of the most (or the most) successful townships at enforcing a low-growth strategy in the county.  Don&#8217;t forget that they are our bulwark against the spread of sprawl from Canton Township.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to add that I am a member of the SEMLC and they have done a sterling job of giving us a &#8220;green zone&#8221;, again between us and the sprawl.  We are fortunate in having this area as a retreat now and in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Whitaker</title>
		<link>http://annarborchronicle.com/2010/01/26/dispute-over-superior-township-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-38451</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Whitaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=36358#comment-38451</guid>
		<description>Amen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmadler</title>
		<link>http://annarborchronicle.com/2010/01/26/dispute-over-superior-township-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-38448</link>
		<dc:creator>cmadler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=36358#comment-38448</guid>
		<description>Ridiculous. What is the point of having zoning if you&#039;re just going to let people ignore it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ridiculous. What is the point of having zoning if you&#8217;re just going to let people ignore it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/8 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 258/261 objects using memcached

Served from: annarborchronicle.com @ 2012-05-27 18:59:27 -->
