Comments on: AAPS Board: No Principal Sharing in 2011-12 http://annarborchronicle.com/2011/05/17/aaps-board-no-principal-sharing-in-2011-12/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=aaps-board-no-principal-sharing-in-2011-12 it's like being there Tue, 16 Sep 2014 04:56:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2 By: Roberta Picard http://annarborchronicle.com/2011/05/17/aaps-board-no-principal-sharing-in-2011-12/comment-page-1/#comment-66037 Roberta Picard Thu, 19 May 2011 21:12:49 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=63886#comment-66037 Six elementary schools need a new principal. Five of them participated in an interview process (two teacher and two parents). The sixth is Haisley elementary. How is this exclusion even possible given the district’s innumerable policies and procedures (including one directed to the composition of the two parent group to be involved in the interview process), much less justifiable?

]]>
By: Elizabeth Nelson http://annarborchronicle.com/2011/05/17/aaps-board-no-principal-sharing-in-2011-12/comment-page-1/#comment-65997 Elizabeth Nelson Thu, 19 May 2011 00:42:11 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=63886#comment-65997 Too bad Haisley didn’t kick up more of a fuss over their exclusion from the principal hiring process (or I guess no one listened when they did?). That strikes me as very odd, since every other other school in need of a new principal got representation in that process. Very peculiar…

]]>
By: John Floyd http://annarborchronicle.com/2011/05/17/aaps-board-no-principal-sharing-in-2011-12/comment-page-1/#comment-65958 John Floyd Wed, 18 May 2011 03:51:41 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=63886#comment-65958 Thank you for this thorough, well-written report.

I wish I could have gotten a greater sense of the controversy surrounding the Haisley parking lot. Perhaps the details did not come up at the meeting.

Has Brit Satchwell been teetered? If not, he would make a good teeter-ee.

]]>