Comments on: New Technology for Tech Bond Election http://annarborchronicle.com/2012/05/01/new-technology-for-tech-bond-election/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=new-technology-for-tech-bond-election it's like being there Tue, 16 Sep 2014 04:56:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2 By: Jim Rees http://annarborchronicle.com/2012/05/01/new-technology-for-tech-bond-election/comment-page-1/#comment-97652 Jim Rees Thu, 03 May 2012 11:53:30 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=86811#comment-97652 Interesting that the question of reader identity should come up in an article about voter identity.

]]>
By: A2person http://annarborchronicle.com/2012/05/01/new-technology-for-tech-bond-election/comment-page-1/#comment-97603 A2person Thu, 03 May 2012 01:41:01 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=86811#comment-97603 Wonderful. I love looking through those names, and I am so pleased to see neighbors, community members, PTOs, school board members (who get paid next to nothing for enormous amounts of work), and even Dr. Green giving generously of their own money to help get the word out to support our severely underfunded schools.

Thank you to all of those helping financially. I look forward to casting my vote on Tuesday, so I can do my little part to push back even slightly against the mess that Lansing continues to hand us.

]]>
By: Dave Askins http://annarborchronicle.com/2012/05/01/new-technology-for-tech-bond-election/comment-page-1/#comment-97583 Dave Askins Wed, 02 May 2012 23:29:40 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=86811#comment-97583 A couple of comments in the moderation queue prompt this quick reminder on commenting. It’s fine to pick some screen name that is not your actual name. But we do ask that you pick one and stick to it. For more detail on this: [link]. As examples of folks with screen names not identical to their actual names, who’ve navigated the comments section successfully over the years, I’d offer abc and John Q.

When a screen name varies from the one previously used by the same person, the comment gets automatically flagged and sent to the moderation queue. Typically, I’ll simply shoot the commenter an email and say something like, “Hey, c’mon …” But if no valid email address is supplied I can’t do that.

Choosing a screen name that itself expresses a specific point of view on a particular topic doesn’t typically mesh well with the idea of picking a name and sticking to it. What if you’ve chosen the screen name, “No Conference Center on the Library Lot!” and all you want to do is let people know the scientific name of a bug someone photographed for a Stopped.Watched. item?

Anyway, I don’t mean this as an occasion to open the general topic of screen names verses real names.

Rather than waiting for a resubmitted comment under a previously adopted screen name, here’s the basic information that a commenter would like us to look at – a list of names and dollar amounts: [.pdf of the campaign contributions to the millage campaign from the county clerk's website]

All those names in the list are actual names of actual people – no screen names allowed on those campaign finance forms!

]]>
By: Jim Rees http://annarborchronicle.com/2012/05/01/new-technology-for-tech-bond-election/comment-page-1/#comment-97490 Jim Rees Wed, 02 May 2012 14:55:32 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=86811#comment-97490 Requiring voters to present ID, and requiring poll workers to use this new electronic system, will greatly reduce usability, discourage voting, and cost money. So I have to wonder what we’re getting in return. Was there a big problem with ballot stuffing in previous years that this is intended to fix?

]]>