Column: “Fix” Is In For College Football Playoff

Greed motivates Division I decision – at expense of student-athletes
John U. Bacon

John U. Bacon

Well, it’s finally upon us. No, not the apocalypse – the Mayan calendar be damned – but a bona fide, Division I, college football playoff.  A committee of 12 university presidents – not coaches, or even athletic directors, but presidents – recently approved a plan to create a four-team college football playoff, the last major sport to have one.

So what if college football somehow survived without a playoff since its inception in 1869?  That’s 22 years before James B. Naismith invented the game of basketball, 34 years before the first World Series, and 51 years before the National Football League was even formed.

But yes, we need a playoff now.  Because clearly, the first 143 years of college football were pointless, meaningless and worthless – because they didn’t have a playoff.

It’s true that college football’s popularity – in attendance, TV ratings, merchandise sales, and just about any other way you want to measure it – has never been greater.  But yes, we need a playoff now.

It’s also true that in the past 40 years the game’s leaders have tacked on a bowl game for virtually every team still standing, more than tripling the number of bowl teams from 22 to 70 – which is more than half of the Division I schools currently fielding football teams.

But that wasn’t enough, so they added a 12th game, which schools use to play tomato cans like Southwest Missouri State, solely to grab another payday on the backs of unpaid players. Then they piled on conference title games, too – increasing the total games a good team could play from 11 to 14 – just two shy of the NFL’s regular season.

But we need a playoff now. Why? To take the competition out of the hands of computers and pollsters, we’re told, and settle it on the field.

So how are they going to fix that? Instead of picking two teams based on polls, strength of schedule and computerized rankings, they are going to have a selection committee pick four teams – based on polls, strength of schedule and computerized rankings. Problem solved!

So, instead of the third-ranked team complaining that it got screwed out of a title shot, the fifth-placed team will do all the whining. Another problem solved!

A four-team playoff won’t end arguments, just expand them. It won’t heighten the regular season, it will diminish it. It won’t shrink the schedule, but extend it. It won’t reduce injuries – especially concussions – but increase them.

Here are a few other sure bets: the playoff will result in more insane incentives in coaches’ already insane contracts.  Last year, LSU’s head coach Les Miles would get a $5 million bonus if his Tigers beat Alabama in the title game – which would have doubled his salary for coaching 60 minutes of football.

But LSU lost, and maybe that’s not bad thing. How many coaches, faced with a star receiver who got caught plagiarizing a paper, or a quarterback with a concussion, would have the integrity to do the right thing and bench those players – and forfeit a $5 million payday? Save your breath. We already know the answer. (And if you think football coaches already have too much power – you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.)

I’m still dumb enough to believe in amateur athletics, and yes, even the ideal of the student-athlete. I’ve met too many to dismiss the idea that it can be done, and done well. But the argument against paying players is getting pretty hard to make given the millions and millions everyone else is making on their labor. And who wants to bet these same leaders will be able to stop at a four-team playoff?

College football decided to do at least one thing with transparent honesty: sell the rights to the title game to the highest bidder. It’s that obvious, it’s that crass.

Enter NFL Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones, one of the more shameless people in sports – which is saying something. He somehow got Texas taxpayers to chip in $325 million for his Jerry-World Domed Stadium. Now he’s boasting he’ll happily outbid everybody else to host the college football title game to fill his stadium – if not his insatiable ego.

After this year’s title game, I wrote, “Do not ask for whom the buck tolls. It tolls for the adults, not the kids.” I’d love to tell you I was wrong then – or I’m wrong now.

Years ago, Notre Dame athletic director Father Edmund Joyce said that sometimes college football gets so overheated, we need to throw a bucket of cold water on it.

If only.

After this playoff comes to pass, we’ll need a fire hose – but the fire will be out of control by then, and we’ll be too late.

Problem solved.

About the author: John U. Bacon is the author of the New York Times bestseller “Three and Out: Rich Rodriguez and the Michigan Wolverines in the Crucible of College Football.” He also co-authored “A Legacy of Champions,” and provided commentary for “Black and Blue: The Story of Gerald Ford, Willis Ward, and the 1934 Michigan-Georgia Tech Football Game,” which has been airing on various stations in Michigan and nationally.

The Chronicle relies in part on regular voluntary subscriptions to support our publication of columnists like John U. Bacon. Click this link for details: Subscribe to The Chronicle. And if you’re already supporting us, please encourage your friends, neighbors and colleagues to help support The Chronicle, too!

6 Comments

  1. By abc
    July 13, 2012 at 12:28 pm | permalink

    In 1976 James Michener wrote ‘Sports in America’ where he raised a number of troubling issues about how colleges and universities are exploiting student/athletes (among other troubling issues that are still… issues). But he did not just identify problems he also offered a possible approach for schools where an athlete could be an athlete while in their prime, and go on to even compete professionally, but also be afforded the opportunity to return to complete their education afterwords with their scholarship. If I recall correctly part of his idea was to make it easier for student/athletes to pursue more rigorous degrees because they did not have to complete them before they departed for their professional careers.

    An article from 2008 has the following – Some athletes say they have pursued — or have been steered to — degree programs that helped keep them eligible for sports but didn’t prepare them for post-sports careers.”A major in eligibility, with a minor in beating the system,” says C. Keith Harrison, an associate professor at the University of Central Florida, where he is associate director of the Institute of Diversity and Ethics in Sports.

    Mr. Bacon I have to assume that you are familiar with this book and I am wondering if you have any thoughts as to whether there have been any improvements in the way college athletes are treated (encouraged) with respect to pursuing a real education. I have to imagine that extending their season cannot help.

    I have occasionally had the opportunity to ask people in sports if student/athletes are really student/athletes, or are they athlete/students. Mostly I get the answer I want to hear but always seem to wonder if that answer is not practiced and hollow. Certainly the NCAA likes to tout the graduation rate but I have also seen reports that many of the degrees are based on the easiest coursework possible. One of Michener’s salient points was that schools profit greatly from their athletes (and I know this varies by sport) and they should use some of that profit to make sure that the athlete gets a quality education even if that means making a place for them at their school after they are done playing collegiate and pro sports.

  2. By Scott Rosencrans
    July 13, 2012 at 4:24 pm | permalink

    Having been more than pleased with your articles and radio reports to date, I have been secretly lamenting that the day might come when I disagree with your position. Today’s the day. I think the playoff idea is good because I think that the other two systems used in my lifetime have been either mind blowingly subjective or non-humanly inappropriate. Football is a game of human excellence juxtaposed to human style failings. I happen to think that when even a referee fails (unless corruption is involved) it is still an essential part of the sport experience. I agree with the “settle it on the field” line of thinking, but understand your comments surrounding that idea. On the other hand, how can any system that would be this conclusive provide greater opportunity for discourse and contention than 1) a system where an elite decided the champion in a closed room, or 2) a system where the HAL 9000 is in control of the decision?

    Naturally, your writing is stellar as usual.

  3. By Colin Oatley
    July 13, 2012 at 10:12 pm | permalink

    The college presidents are doing what they were hired to do: maximizing revenue from sales and donations, while minimizing costs. If the presidents fail to do so, they will lose their jobs. The athletes should be allowed to maximize their own revenues, but the schools and the NFL have colluded to prevent football players from competing in a free and open job market for athletic talent.

  4. July 14, 2012 at 9:14 am | permalink

    The student/athletes, many of them, may be unpaid but they are not uncompensated. Most non-athletes attending the University of Michigan will graduate with the debt they took on to pay the University’s high tuition. Athletes on full scholarships won’t. That’s not nothing.

  5. By Steve Bean
    July 14, 2012 at 10:42 am | permalink

    Just one more example where the use of money diminishes us.

  6. By Scratchigmyhead
    July 15, 2012 at 3:48 pm | permalink

    John U. Have you ever heard of Dr. Harry Edward,I believe from San Diego State University. Dr. Edwards wrote about this very same issue 40 years ago. If you are not familiar with him, please google. Dr. Edwards predicted this very same thing but he limited his comments to African American athletes. What I don’t understand is that Mary Sue is supposed to be so student focus, why isn’t she voicing concerns about the extension of the football season especially as it impacts the so=called student athletes, especially as it exposed them to additional injuries and will interfere with their academics. What hyporcracy.