http://annarborchronicle.com/2013/04/11/liberty-division-39/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=liberty-division-39 it's like being there Tue, 16 Sep 2014 04:56:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2 http://annarborchronicle.com/2013/04/11/liberty-division-39/comment-page-1/#comment-243228 Linda Diane Feldt Sun, 14 Apr 2013 21:47:45 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=110208#comment-243228 Yes, it was hooked up to a rope that caused the chair to rock, rather rapidly and strongly.

]]> http://annarborchronicle.com/2013/04/11/liberty-division-39/comment-page-1/#comment-243216 Jim Rees Sun, 14 Apr 2013 20:44:59 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=110208#comment-243216 Does it actually rock? If so I think it would be in violation of 5:508(4), “Any sign which has any visible motion…”

]]> http://annarborchronicle.com/2013/04/11/liberty-division-39/comment-page-1/#comment-242125 Linda Diane Feldt Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:15:21 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=110208#comment-242125 Well it certainly caught my attention, but mostly I found it disturbing. Not a welcoming “sign” in any way. I had to consider that someone took the time to rig the chair so it rocks, dress the mannequin, and then put it all together. And at no time during that process do they stop to ponder, “is this really a good idea?”
I am not the demographic they are seeking.

]]> http://annarborchronicle.com/2013/04/11/liberty-division-39/comment-page-1/#comment-242104 Jim Rees Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:14:44 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=110208#comment-242104 Wonder if that conforms to the sign ordinance?

]]>