Comments on: City Planners Preview SEMCOG Forecast http://annarborchronicle.com/2012/01/12/city-planners-preview-semcog-forecast/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=city-planners-preview-semcog-forecast it's like being there Tue, 16 Sep 2014 04:56:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2 By: John Floyd http://annarborchronicle.com/2012/01/12/city-planners-preview-semcog-forecast/comment-page-1/#comment-86368 John Floyd Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:38:49 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=79193#comment-86368 Mr. Cooper seems to have a solution – more, and more expensive, mass transit – in search of a problem that SEMCOG does not think will exist. The idea that transportation planning should hang on whether or not couple of apartment buildings get built seems a tad desperate.

It seems, from the degree of surprise among Ann Arbor city officials that this article documents, that the city has done all its “planning” without ever contacting SEMCOG and consulting its population projections. Apparently, all the zoning changes/infrastructure upgrades were based on little more than “If you build it, they will come”. Or does the city have some other authoritative source of growth – even an internal study – that SEMCOG has overlooked? Surely the city must have other data sources that support the drive to density – even the local ruling class can’t be that amateurish. What is this other data source?

]]>
By: Bob Martel http://annarborchronicle.com/2012/01/12/city-planners-preview-semcog-forecast/comment-page-1/#comment-86348 Bob Martel Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:33:24 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=79193#comment-86348 The chart tells me that a lot of those new “households” projected for 2020 are going to be in assisted living and memory care units.

]]>