http://annarborchronicle.com/2012/06/22/townhome-project-raises-density-concerns/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=townhome-project-raises-density-concerns it's like being there Tue, 16 Sep 2014 04:56:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2 http://annarborchronicle.com/2012/06/22/townhome-project-raises-density-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-110036 James Jefferson Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:39:30 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=90737#comment-110036 Perhaps the Public Schools can earn some much-needed cash and sell their parcel to the city for use as a park? That would be a better use than it is now; it would preserve the land buffering the schools, and remove the tax and maintenance costs from the schools budget.

]]> http://annarborchronicle.com/2012/06/22/townhome-project-raises-density-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-109760 Rod Johnson Sat, 23 Jun 2012 00:13:03 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=90737#comment-109760 I’m sure there are some. But the city provides parkland for the rest of Ann Arbor, so why should FHC residents have to supply their own? Why is that inequity OK? (I’m not sure why the emphasis on *Cooperative*–the fact they’re a coop doesn’t mean they’re some kind of collectivist hippies. They just own shares in the coop.)

]]> http://annarborchronicle.com/2012/06/22/townhome-project-raises-density-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-109644 TJ Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:05:41 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=90737#comment-109644 Hmmm, if the people in Forest Hills *Cooperative* think there are not enough places for children to play in the area, perhaps they could provide some on their land?

]]>