Comments on: Planning Commission Reviews 2014 Priorities http://annarborchronicle.com/2014/01/17/planning-commissioners-review-2014-priorities/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=planning-commissioners-review-2014-priorities it's like being there Tue, 16 Sep 2014 04:56:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2 By: Jeff Hayner http://annarborchronicle.com/2014/01/17/planning-commissioners-review-2014-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-292715 Jeff Hayner Sat, 18 Jan 2014 15:15:49 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=128467#comment-292715 Thanks to Jeremy Peters for asking for an analysis of the drive-thru situation, before the social engineers on Planning Commission eliminate them in their quest for ‘walkable nodes’. The Potential Future Projects list contains a lot of amending – it will be important to apply the same analysis to these items. What is it that calls for amending? What problem are we trying to solve? As for economic development leading the list, I would suggest we take care of old business first, like finishing ZORO, before starting new projects.

]]> By: Kathy Griswold http://annarborchronicle.com/2014/01/17/planning-commissioners-review-2014-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-292642 Kathy Griswold Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:12:42 +0000 http://annarborchronicle.com/?p=128467#comment-292642 Two excellent future projects would be:

- High school student representation on the planning commission
- Non-motorized plan implementation/pedestrian safety & sidewalk initiatives (with systems planning unit)

Thanks for the interest in these two areas.

]]>