Warren outpolled rivals Pam Byrnes and Thomas Partridge with 55.58%  – or 13,113 votes – in the race for state Senate District 18. Byrnes came in with 40.43% (9,539 votes), with Partridge at 3.85% (908 votes). The district covers the cities of Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti and the townships of Ann Arbor, Augusta, Dexter, Freedom, Lima, Lyndon, Northfield, Salem, Scio, Sharon, Superior, Sylvan, Webster and Ypsilanti. It’s currently represented by Liz Brater, who is term-limited.

Irwin’s race was even closer – he won his race against Ned Staebler with just 51% of the votes cast and, if elected in November, will be representing District 53 in the state House. Irwin brought in 5,051 votes compared to Staebler’s 4,845. The district, currently represented by Warren, takes in Ann Arbor and parts of Ann Arbor, Pittsfield and Scio townships.

In the governor’s race, Rick Snyder of Ann Arbor – who carried the field statewide for the Republican nomination – did well in Washtenaw County, getting 49% of the votes in the GOP primary. Democrat Virg Bernero beat Andy Dillon with 65% of the votes in Washtenaw County – he won the statewide nomination as well.

In November, Warren will face the winner of the state Senate Republican primary, John Hochstetler, who beat rival Gary Wellings with 59% of the votes (7,973). For the state House race in District 53, Irwin will go up against Republican Chase Ingersoll, who was unopposed in the primary.

The breakdown by precinct for the state House race:

Precinct         Irwin         Staebler
Ann Arbor 1-1      12            11
Ann Arbor 1-2       9	          1
Ann Arbor 1-3      26            10
Ann Arbor 1-4     114            72
Ann Arbor 1-5     197           110
Ann Arbor 1-6      73            60
Ann Arbor 1-7       8            13
Ann Arbor 1-8     156            99
Ann Arbor 1-10    217           142
Ann Arbor 2-2       2             1
Ann Arbor 2-3      48            34
Ann Arbor 2-4     142           215
Ann Arbor 3-1      20             4
Ann Arbor 3-2      59            28
Ann Arbor 3-3     267           366
Ann Arbor 3-4     176           174
Ann Arbor 3-5      70            68
Ann Arbor 3-6     112            86
Ann Arbor 3-7     168           185
Ann Arbor 3-8     219           136
Ann Arbor 3-9      97           149
Ann Arbor 4-1       8             4
Ann Arbor 4-2      24            19
Ann Arbor 4-3      73           145
Ann Arbor 4-4     182           211
Ann Arbor 4-5      81           126
Ann Arbor 4-6     152           176
Ann Arbor 4-7     171           258
Ann Arbor 4-8      63            79
Ann Arbor 4-9     162           201
Ann Arbor 5-1      38            29
Ann Arbor 5-2     225           205
Ann Arbor 5-3     122           108
Ann Arbor 5-4     319           195
Ann Arbor 5-5     155           129
Ann Arbor 5-6     169           183
Ann Arbor 5-7      55            44
Ann Arbor 5-8      90           113
Ann Arbor 5-9     228           182
Ann Arbor 5-10    161           156
Ann Arbor 5-11    365           301
Ann Arbor Twp 1     3             2
Ann Arbor Twp 2    10             1

Total           5,051         4,845

-

The breakdown by precinct for the state Senate race:

Precinct               Byrnes Partridge Warren

A2 City, Ward 1, Pct 1     11     0      12
A2 City, Ward 1, Pct 2      3     0       6
A2 City, Ward 1, Pct 3      7     1      30
A2 City, Ward 1, Pct 4     57     8     124
A2 City, Ward 1, Pct 5     71     3     239
A2 City, Ward 1, Pct 6     21     3     115
A2 City, Ward 1, Pct 7      8     1      15
A2 City, Ward 1, Pct 8    140     8     246
A2 City, Ward 1, Pct 9    203     5     120
A2 City, Ward 1, Pct 10   110     9     266
A2 City, Ward 2, Pct 1     50     1      35
A2 City, Ward 2, Pct 2      2     1       2
A2 City, Ward 2, Pct 3     24     1      52
A2 City, Ward 2, Pct 4    110     8     234
A2 City, Ward 2, Pct 5    180     5     132
A2 City, Ward 2, Pct 6    202     7     137
A2 City, Ward 2, Pct 7    210     4     109
A2 City, Ward 2, Pct 8    180     2      85
A2 City, Ward 2, Pct 9    166     5     115
A2 City, Ward 3, Pct 1      1     0      23
A2 City, Ward 3, Pct 2     29     0      64
A2 City, Ward 3, Pct 3    161     9     456
A2 City, Ward 3, Pct 4     93     3     258
A2 City, Ward 3, Pct 5     42    10      90
A2 City, Ward 3, Pct 6     55     7     143
A2 City, Ward 3, Pct 7     79     5     274
A2 City, Ward 3, Pct 8     81     6     262
A2 City, Ward 3, Pct 9     70    20     161
A2 City, Ward 4, Pct 1      1     0       7
A2 City, Ward 4, Pct 2      9     0      35
A2 City, Ward 4, Pct 3     61     3     159
A2 City, Ward 4, Pct 4    108     9     278
A2 City, Ward 4, Pct 5     50     8     157
A2 City, Ward 4, Pct 6    104    10     229
A2 City, Ward 4, Pct 7    142    13     282
A2 City, Ward 4, Pct 8     62    11      82
A2 City, Ward 4, Pct 9    126    13     227
A2 City, Ward 5, Pct 1     16     1      53
A2 City, Ward 5, Pct 2    100     5     344
A2 City, Ward 5, Pct 3     60     8     175
A2 City, Ward 5, Pct 4    102     6     420
A2 City, Ward 5, Pct 5     84     9     210
A2 City, Ward 5, Pct 6     79    11     271
A2 City, Ward 5, Pct 7     35     2      69
A2 City, Ward 5, Pct 8     61     5     146
A2 City, Ward 5, Pct 9     83    11     330
A2 City, Ward 5, Pct 10    90     7     222
A2 City, Ward 5, Pct 11   134    17     526
Ann Arbor Twp, Pct 1       87     2      55
Ann Arbor Twp, Pct 2      114     3     101
Augusta Twp, Pct 1         88    14     102
Augusta Twp, Pct 2         37    14      76
Augusta Twp, Pct 3         86    38     107
City of Chelsea, Pct 1    195     3      60
City of Chelsea, Pct 2    129     7      21
Dexter Twp, Pct 1         100     4      41
Dexter Twp, Pct 2         110     1      39
Dexter Twp, Pct 3          63     1      30
Freedom Twp, Pct 1         82     2      28
Lima Twp, Pct 1           109     3      37
Lyndon Twp, Pct 1         151    10      44
Northfield Twp, Pct 1     102     3      48
Northfield Twp, Pct 2      91     9      37
Northfield Twp, Pct 3      41     5      25
Pitts Chrt Twp, Pct 5       1     0       2
Pitts Chrt Twp, Pct 7       2     0       0
Salem Twp, Pct 1           17     9      54
Salem Twp, Pct 2           26    17      67
Salem Twp, Pct 3           26     5      31
Scio Twp, Pct 1           114     2      57
Scio Twp, Pct 2            64     2      26
Scio Twp, Pct 3            98     1      77
Scio Twp, Pct 4           126     1      72
Scio Twp, Pct 5            72     5      35
Scio Twp, Pct 6            63     3      38
Scio Twp, Pct 7           122     3      72
Scio Twp, Pct 8           125     0     119
Scio Twp, Pct 9           101     5      92
Sharon Twp, Pct 1          93     5      16
Superior Twp, Pct 1        87     4      61
Superior Twp, Pct 2       126    19     137
Superior Twp, Pct 3        99    14      67
Superior Twp, Pct 4        69    18      57
Superior Twp, Pct 5        90     9     107
Sylvan Twp, Pct 1         156     7      29
Webster Twp, Pct 1        118     3      55
Webster Twp, Pct 2         61     1      23
Webster Twp, Pct 3         58     6      29
Ypsi City, Ward 1, Pct 1   73    24     107
Ypsi City, Ward 1, Pct 2   81    15     128
Ypsi City, Ward 1, Pct 3   46    10      48
Ypsi City, Ward 2, Pct 1   98     6     153
Ypsi City, Ward 2, Pct 2   85    11     174
Ypsi City, Ward 2, Pct 3   66     4     182
Ypsi City, Ward 2, Pct 4   11     2      11
Ypsi City, Ward 3, Pct 1   16     1      20
Ypsi City, Ward 3, Pct 2   79     6     159
Ypsi City, Ward 3, Pct 3  113    24     174
Ypsi Twp, Pct 1            45     7      57
Ypsi Twp, Pct 2            57    17     101
Ypsi Twp, Pct 3            45    12      62
Ypsi Twp, Pct 4            60     8      95
Ypsi Twp, Pct 5            38     6      33
Ypsi Twp, Pct 6            19     4      24
Ypsi Twp, Pct 7            36    11      49
Ypsi Twp, Pct 8            31     8      56
Ypsi Twp, Pct 9            73     7      93
Ypsi Twp, Pct 10           37     5      48
Ypsi Twp, Pct 11           58    18      44
Ypsi Twp, Pct 12           33    11      29
Ypsi Twp, Pct 13           56     7      76
Ypsi Twp, Pct 14           78    17      97
Ypsi Twp, Pct 15           26     3      30
Ypsi Twp, Pct 16           18     2      16
Ypsi Twp, Pct 17           98    10     157
Ypsi Twp, Pct 18           34     2      69
Ypsi Twp, Pct 19           60    10      94
Ypsi Twp, Pct 20           60     9      73
Ypsi Twp, AVCB 1          291    60     245
Ypsi Twp, AVCB 2          246    32     208
                        9,539   908  13,113

Home plate at Allmendinger Park. It's been scuffed up, even though it hasn't endured a primary election.

On Monday, Washtenaw County clerk Larry Kestenbaum told The Chronicle that he didn’t have a specific forecast in terms of percentage turnout, but he noted that the relatively high turnout he’d been expecting didn’t seem to be panning out in the absentee ballot application and return rates. For the city of Ann Arbor, we’ve been tracking the city clerk’s absentee ballot return reports, and through July 31, 3,092 had been returned for today’s election. That compares with 2,578 absentee ballots cast in August 2006 and 2,803 in August 2008. It’s certainly an upward trend.

But we’re more interested in draft-horse governance than thoroughbred races (and I promise we won’t beat that analogy like a dead horse too much longer). So we decided to see what kind of base-level knowledge people in Ann Arbor had about their elected officials. Base level, as in: Who represents you on the city council?

And what better day than election day to present the results of our admittedly informal survey.

We didn’t ask about the mayor-ship in our survey, or state-level races. But this column is as good a venue as any to speculate about how the gubernatorial horse race on the Republican side might affect the Ann Arbor Democratic primary for mayor.

That’s like suggesting that the games in the American League West Division could have an impact on the outcome of games in the National League East. But there’s got to be a way to transition out of this awful horse race analogy. And a pennant race, yeah, that just might be the ticket.

Informal Survey on Council Representation

[For our readers who aren't familiar with the cultural reference of the headline, "Who's on First" is an Abbott and Costello comedy routine that trades on misunderstandings arising from words like "who" and "what." Watch it on YouTube.]

During the month of July, Chronicle intern Rebecca Friedman went out to ask people a simple question: Who represents you on city council? She surveyed nearly 100 people at several locations: the Ann Arbor Summer Festival’s Top of the Park, Ann Arbor July 4th parade, Townie Street Party and Ann Arbor art fairs.

The first filter for respondents was finding out if the person lived in Ann Arbor. Several people believed they lived in Ann Arbor, based on their Ann Arbor mailing address and the fact that their kids went to Ann Arbor public schools. But when asked to identify where they lived on a map, it turned out they actually lived in Scio or Pittsfield townships. So they were off the hook.

Of the 94 people that Rebecca surveyed who did live in Ann Arbor, 14% could name both current council representatives. Another 16% could name one councilmember. I should add that we were very generous in this tally – if a Fifth Warder said “Mike!” but couldn’t come up with Mike Anglin’s last name, we counted that in the “Knows” category. We worded the question so that it wouldn’t indicate that there’s more than one councilmember per ward. In some cases, people were surprised to learn there are two.

So 30% of our sampling knew at least one of their city council representatives. Is that good? If you’re a glass-half-full kind of person, maybe so. Of course, that leaves 70% of residents who had absolutely no idea. (And if we’d asked who represents them on the Washtenaw County board of commissioners, I’m guessing the percentage of “have absolutely no clue” responses would have been significantly higher. Do you know?)

Chronicle intern Rebecca Friedman.

Interestingly, Rebecca reported that there were some people who were supremely confident they knew their councilmembers – until she asked for specific names. A couple of them got a bit defensive at this point, still asserting that they did, in fact, know who represented them. Perhaps if your self-image includes the characteristic “engaged community member” or “political activist” and that balloon is popped by your inability to dredge up a basic fact, well, I’d be grumpy too. Or maybe their synapses just weren’t firing quickly that day – it happens.

Wards 1 and 2 did well in terms of the number of the people who knew both of their council representatives – five people from Ward 1 could name both Sabra Briere and Sandi Smith as their councilmembers, and five from Ward 2 named both Tony Derezinski and Stephen Rapundalo. Two people from Ward 5 knew both Carsten Hohnke and Mike Anglin.

Only one person from Ward 4 could come up with both Marcia Higgins and Margie Teall as their council reps. No one from Ward 3 named both councilmembers – Christopher Taylor and Stephen Kunselman.

To confirm that they were naming the correct council rep, Rebecca also asked people to identify which ward they lived in. Often, people didn’t know – but were able to confirm the ward by indicating where they lived on a map. But it’s also interesting that of the 41 people she surveyed who knew what ward they lived in, 17 couldn’t name a council rep.

Rebecca also collected some comments from the people she interviewed. Here’s a sampling:

• “How embarrassing.” (This person didn’t know either council rep.)
• “I should know these things. I’ll go look that up.” (Here’s where to find out.)
• “Yes…don’t I? (pause) Mike… I should know the last name.” (It’s Anglin.)
• “Uh, I can visualize the face…” (But not the name, apparently.)
• “I know… what’s his name?” (The person then guessed Chris Easthope, a former city councilmember who was elected 15th District Court judge in November 2008.)
• A Ward 3 resident: “I’m sick of it all so I stopped paying attention.”
• A Ward 1 resident who knew both current council reps also knew that the challenger in the Aug. 3 primary had a “long Indian name that starts with a K.” (Her name is Sumi Kailasapathy.)
• “I’m sure they’re Democrats and I always vote Republican.” (True for the primary, but stay tuned for the November election.)
• A Ward 2 resident confidently said they knew their council representative was Joan Lowenstein. (Lowenstein last served on council in 2008.)
• A Ward 5 resident had this to say: “Mike Anglin is the only one that represents me. Sabra Briere represents me but I’m not in her ward. Carsten Hohnke is in my ward but he doesn’t represent me.”
• “I’ve lived here for twenty-some years and I don’t know.”
• “Don’t know. I’ll vote for whoever is not in office.”
• From a Ward 4 resident: “They drop a lot of stuff at my door and I just throw it in the garbage.”

What can we make of this? Well, I’ll say again that this was in no way a rigorous survey – our goal was to get a sense of how informed residents are about their city council reps, but other than the general observation of “not very,” I wouldn’t go much further.

But I would go back to the comment by the Ward 3 resident, who said “I’m sick of it all so I stopped paying attention.” I totally get the “sick of it all” sentiment, especially given the bizarre behavior we’ve witnessed during this particular primary election cycle. But consider this a plea to start paying attention – both for residents, and for councilmembers who could do a better job at reaching out to their constituents.

Paying attention locally is our mission is here at The Chronicle. We hope we’re making it easier for you to do the same.

Michigan Gubernatorial Politics, Ann Arbor Mayoral Primary

One school of thought we’ve heard through the community as election season has headed to the primaries is that the Republican nominee for governor will probably win the November election. It’s like when every inside-baseball fan knows that the winner of the National League playoffs – whoever it is – is going to win the World Series against whatever team the American League throws up against them.

What difference does the Republican nominee make for the predominantly Democratic Ann Arbor? Plenty. Many voters who think that the Republican nominee is likely to win in November, would like a say in who that nominee is. Of the Republicans contesting the race – Mike Bouchard, Mike Cox, Tom George, Pete Hoekstra, Rick Snyder – many local Democrats would like to cross over and vote in the Republican primary for Snyder, who’s well known here.

But one reason potential Democratic-to-Republican cross-over voters are hesitating is that it means they wouldn’t be able to vote in the Democratic mayoral primary, which is contested between 10-year incumbent John Hieftje and Patrica Lesko. There’s enough doubt in their minds about Hieftje’s re-election that they’re staying home with the Dems so they can vote for him. Others are taking what they think is a small risk that Lesko wins and crossing over to vote for Snyder.

On the flip side, some potential cross-over voters from the Republican side find Lesko’s message about focusing on the basics appealing. But some of them are still inclined to stay home and vote in the Republican primary, because of the importance of the choice for governor.

The Ann Arbor mayor’s race is further complicated this year, though, because of the large number of people who say they’re not happy with their candidate of choice. Many likely Lesko voters say they aren’t pleased to be voting for her, but at least she’s not Hieftje. And voters who’ll likely cast a vote for Hieftje aren’t happy about it, but at least he’s not Lesko. It’s like Ann Arbor voters have become the political equivalent of Mets fans – they actually think the Mets suck, but at least the Mets aren’t the Yankees.

In baseball as in voting it’s easy to tell who won – you look at the score. But in voting, there’s always a spin you can give the numbers, just like when you grip the ball across the seams. One record that Hieftje’s supporters often cite as point of pride is the fact that he’s never lost a single precinct in 10 years worth of elections. If that pattern stays intact, it’d be hard to spin a Hieftje victory as anything but decisive.

If Lesko receives more votes than Hieftje, of course, that’s an outright victory. But short of a majority, to claim at least a moral victory of any kind she’ll need to do appreciably better than the anybody-but-Hieftje vote as reflected in the last two Democratic primaries: 31% for Tom Wall in 2008, and 30% for Wendy Woods in 2006.

This kind of speculation is all academic at this point – it’s impossible to predict. What do they say in baseball? That’s why we play the game.