The Ann Arbor Chronicle » Shell station

Development: Council OKs 3 Site Plans

Chronicle Staff — Tue, 22 Apr 2014 01:17:34 +0000

Three different site plans were approved by the Ann Arbor city council at its April 21, 2014 meeting: Concordia University’s proposed gym expansion; an expansion of an office building on Collingwood; and the overhaul of a Shell station on South State.

A site plan to expand the existing Concordia University gym was approved by the city council with scant discussion, but with thanks expressed by Jane Lumm (Ward 2) Concordia University CEO Curt Gielow.

Aerial view of Concordia campus.

The plan also includes reconfiguring nearby parking lots and stormwater management features on the 187-acre site at 4090 Geddes Road, just west of US-23 and north of the Huron River. The city planning commission recommended approval of the site plan at its March 4, 2014 meeting.

Planning commissioners granted a special exception use for the project. That’s required because the private university is located on a site zoned R1B (single-family residential district). The site plan requires city council approval, but the special exception use does not.

The proposal calls for a three-story, 34,391-square-foot addition to the current 22,021-square-foot gym that was built in the early 1960s, located on the west side of Concordia’s main campus. [.pdf of campus map] The addition will include men’s and women’s locker rooms, athletic office space, classrooms and an auxiliary gym.

A second phase of the project entails constructing a single-story, 5,280-square-foot athletic training room. An existing gravel parking area west of the gym will be paved and landscaped, and another lot north of the gym along Geddes will get new landscaping and bioswales. A total of 92 new parking spaces will be created, mostly in the former gravel lot.

A new stormwater management system will be completed to address a 100-year storm event, including a detention pond with an outlet into a bioswale south of the developed area. The site plan is for a planned project, which allows variations in height and placement. The proposed addition would be 39 feet high. The site’s zoning has a height limit of 30 feet. The existing gym is about 33 feet high, measured at the midpoint of the roof.

In other action on land use approvals at its April 21 meeting, the council approved a site plan that expands an office building at 278-280 Collingwood. The proposal received a recommendation of approval from the Ann Arbor planning commission at its March 18, 2014 meeting.

Aerial view indicating location of 278-280 Collingwood Drive.

The site plan calls for removing the existing second floor on the east side of the office building and constructing a 2,451-square-foot second floor over the entire building for office use.

A new staircase will be added at the southwest corner of the building. The second floor will overhang the first floor along the front of the building and along part of the north side. An existing curbcut on the north side of the property will be removed. The current 22 parking spaces on the site will be reduced to 17.

Planning commissioners approved modifications to the city’s landscaping requirements for this site. Total construction cost for this project is estimated at $300,000. The office building is located in Ward 4. Collingwood Drive is a street off of West Stadium Boulevard, just south of West Stadium’s convergence with South Maple Road. [.pdf of staff memo]

Finally, the council approved a site plan for the overhaul of a Shell station and a new drive-thru restaurant at 2991 S. State. The site is located at the northeast corner of the East Eisenhower Parkway and South State Street.

Aerial view of the site for a Shell station and drive-thru restaurant at the northeast corner of South State and East Eisenhower.

The city planning commission recommended approval of the site plan at its March 18, 2014 meeting. The plan calls for demolishing the current one-story convenience store and car wash on this site, which total 2,435 square feet. In its place, the owner – Joseph Kafi of JAK Cubed LLC – would put up a single building with a 1,250-square-foot drive-thru restaurant and 3,000-square-foot convenience store.

The existing gas pump island canopy will remain in place, and two pumps will be relocated to spots under the canopy. According to a staff memo, a single lane drive-thru would be primarily accessed from the existing East Eisenhower Parkway curb cut. Vehicles would move in an east-to-north direction before exiting onto either South State or East Eisenhower.

The drive-thru lane provides stacking for up to nine vehicles and would be screened to the west by the proposed new building. A total of 22 parking spaces are proposed for the site, including eight that are located at the four gas pump islands. The project, located in Ward 4, is estimated to cost $800,000. The business is expected to remain open during construction. The existing convenience store will then be demolished after the new building is finished.

The specific restaurant to be located there is still being negotiated. [.pdf of staff report]

This brief was filed from the city council’s chambers on the second floor of city hall, located at 301 E. Huron.

April 21, 2014: City Council Live Updates

Dave Askins — Mon, 21 Apr 2014 19:50:18 +0000

Editor’s note: This “Live Updates” coverage of the Ann Arbor city council’s April 21, 2014 meeting includes all the material from an earlier preview article published last week. The intent is to facilitate easier navigation from the live updates section to background material already in this file. Those updates will start closer to the scheduled meeting start time of 7 p.m.

The presentation of the city administrator’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2015, which starts July 1, 2014, is the main event of the Ann Arbor city council’s April 21 meeting. As the second council meeting of April, it’s the occasion specified in the city charter for that presentation.

The sign on the door to the Ann Arbor city council chamber includes Braille.

At its April 21 meeting, however, the council won’t be voting on next year’s budget. Under the city charter, the council will need to adopt the budget by the time of its second regular meeting in May, which falls on May 19 this year. The Chronicle has covered the FY 2015 budget preview in a separate article.

Related to this year’s budget is an agenda item for April 21 that will transfer $600,000 from the affordable housing trust fund to the Ann Arbor Housing Commission. The city administrator had been directed by the council to prepare the budget amendment at its March 3, 2014 meeting. The action was contingent on the final closing of the sale of the former Y lot. Net proceeds from that sale were roughly $1.4 million and were deposited into the affordable housing trust fund. The $600,000 will support AAHC’s efforts to make major capital improvements to its public housing properties.

The AAHC is featured in two other resolutions related to its plan of capital improvements, which include projects at North Maple Estates, North Maple Duplexes, Lower Platt, Broadway, and White/State/Henry apartments. One resolution approves a payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) for those AAHC properties. A second resolution approves a 50% waiver of the site plan, zoning and street vacation fees for the North Maple Estates and Lower Platt projects.

Also on the April 21 agenda based on previous action by the council, at its April 7, 2014 meeting, is the second and final reading of a local ordinance that would regulate smoking in certain outdoor places. Those places include locations near entrances of buildings and potentially in parts of city parks at the discretion of the city administrator. A public hearing will precede the council’s vote on the outdoor smoking regulations.

Measured by the number of items on the agenda, sidewalks are a significant highlight. Sidewalk gaps on Scio Church Road and Newport Road have two resolutions each – related to the special assessments that will be imposed on property owners adjoining the stretches where sidewalks will be constructed. One resolution directs the city assessor to prepare a special assessment roll of properties to be assessed. The other resolution sets a public hearing on the special assessment – for May 5, 2014 at the council’s regular meeting on that date.

The council will also be asked to approve $177,100 of city funds for the construction of the Scio Church sidewalk and for an additional sidewalk on Barton Drive. The Barton Drive sidewalk will also be special assessed – with the associated resolutions to be presented to the council at a future meeting.

Rounding out the council’s April 21 agenda are some land use items. The council will be asked to approve the site plan for an overhaul of a Shell station and a new drive-thru restaurant at the northeast corner of the East Eisenhower Parkway and South State Street. Another site plan the council will be asked to approve is for the expansion of an office building at 278-280 Collingwood on Ann Arbor’s west side. A third site plan on the April 21 agenda is for an expansion to the Concordia University gym, which also includes reconfiguring nearby parking lots and stormwater management features on the 187-acre site at 4090 Geddes Road, just west of US-23 and north of the Huron River.

Also on the April 21 agenda are appointments to the environmental commission for David Stead, Kirk Westphal, and Susan Hutton. Appointments to this commission are different from most appointments to boards and commissions, in that the mayor does not nominate them. The appointments are under control of the council as a body.

The April 21 agenda includes the authorization for some street closings for upcoming events: NTI Block Party (July 30, 2014), Rolling Sculpture Car Show (July 11, 2014), and Ann Arbor Summer Festival’s Top of the Park (June 9 through July 9, 2014).

This article includes a more detailed preview of many of these agenda items. More details on other agenda items are available on the city’s online Legistar system. The meeting proceedings can be followed Monday evening live on Channel 16, streamed online by Community Television Network starting at 7 p.m.

The Chronicle will be filing live updates from city council chambers during the meeting, published in this article below the preview material. Click here to skip the preview section and go directly to the live updates. The meeting is scheduled to start at 7 p.m.

Ann Arbor Housing Commission

Three resolutions on the April 21 agenda relate to the Ann Arbor Housing Commission: a $600,000 transfer from the city’s affordable housing fund to AAHC; approval of a payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) for AAHC properties; and approval of a 50% waiver of fees for capital improvement projects to be undertaken by AAHC.

AAHC: $600,000 Transfer

At its March 3, 2014 meeting, the council had directed the city administrator to prepare a budget resolution that would allocate $600,000 from the city’s affordable housing trust fund to support the AAHC’s plan to renovate its properties.

That allocation was to be contingent on the closing of the sale of the former Y lot to Dennis Dahlmann, as the net proceeds of that sale are to be deposited into the city’s affordable housing trust fund. The sale of the property closed on April 2.

So on the April 21 meeting agenda is the resolution the council had directed the city administrator to prepare.

AAHC: PILOT

The agenda also includes an item authorizing a payment in lieu of taxes for AAHC properties at North Maple Estates, North Maple Duplexes, Lower Platt, Broadway, and White/State/Henry Apartments. The period for which property taxes are being waived – under Section 15(a) of the State Housing Development Authority Act and Chapter 19, Section 1:651 of Ann Arbor City Code – is 50 years. In lieu of taxes, a $1 service charge must be paid.

AAHC: 50% Waiver

For the North Maple and Lower Platt AAHC renovation projects, the city would ordinarily assess fees for site plan approval, zoning approval and street vacation. Those charges break down as follows, for a total of $22,705:

North Maple: $8,995 for site plan approval; $1,425 for zoning approval; and $2,565 for street vacation
Lower Platt: $8,295 for site plan approval; $1,425 for zoning approval

But under Chapter 55, Section 5:108 of Ann Arbor city code, those fees may be reduced by resolution of the city council by up to 50% of the specified fees – if the reduction is based on a finding that the development would provide affordable housing for lower-income households.

The item on the council’s April 21 agenda would reduce the fees by 50%.

Smoking

To be considered for final approval at the council’s April 21 meeting is a law regulating smoking in some outdoor locations. It was given initial approval by the council on April 7. The law would regulate smoking outside of public buildings and also potentially in areas of some city parks.

Made punishable under the proposed ordinance through a $50 civil fine would be smoking within 20 feet of: (1) bus stops; (2) entrances, windows and ventilation systems of the Blake Transit Center; and (3) entrances, windows and ventilation systems any city-owned building. Community service could be ordered instead of the payment of a fine.

The ordinance would also authorize the city administrator to have signs posted designating certain parks or portions of parks as off limits for outdoor smoking, and to increase the distance from entrances to city buildings where outdoor smoking is prohibited.

Where no signs are posted noting the smoking prohibition, a citation could be issued only if someone doesn’t stop smoking immediately when asked to stop.

A public hearing on the new ordinance will be held at the April 21 meeting.

The initial approval at the council’s April 7, 2014 meeting came after it had been postponed on March 3, 2014, and before that on Feb. 3, 2014. The initial approval came over dissent from Sumi Kailasapathy (Ward 1), Jane Lumm (Ward 2) and Jack Eaton (Ward 4). They cited concern that enforcement of the smoking law could distract from other policing duties and could have a disparate impact on the homeless population.

Chuck Warpehoski (Ward 5), sponsor of the proposed new local law, appeared before the city’s park advisory commission on Feb. 25, 2014 to brief commissioners on the proposal and solicit feedback.

An existing Washtenaw County ordinance already prohibits smoking near entrances, windows and ventilation systems, according to the staff memo accompanying the resolution – but the county’s ordinance can be enforced only by the county health department. The memo further notes that the Michigan Clean Indoor Air Act does not regulate outdoor smoking.

Ellen Rabinowitz, interim health officer for Washtenaw County, attended the April 7 meeting and spoke to councilmembers about the county’s experience. She supported the city ordinance, as did Cliff Douglas, director of the University of Michigan’s Tobacco Research Network. Douglas addressed the council during public commentary and answered questions later in the meeting.

Council deliberations from the initial approval of this item are included in The Chronicle’s live updates filed during the April 7 meeting.

Sidewalks

Sidewalk gaps on Scio Church Road and Newport Road have two resolutions each – related to the special assessments that will be imposed on property owners adjoining the stretches where sidewalks are to be constructed. One resolution directs the city assessor to prepare a special assessment roll of properties to be assessed. The other resolution sets a public hearing on the special assessment – for May 5, 2014 at the council’s regular meeting on that date.

The total amount to be special assessed for the Newport Road project is $49,746. But residents of the Newport Creek Site Condominium – who would not ordinarily be assessed, as their property isn’t adjacent to the sidewalk – have volunteered to contribute $10,228 to the project to help offset their neighbors’ assessments. Details of that arrangement are being finalized.

For the Scio Church Road sidewalk project, the total cost is expected to be $365,100. Of that, about $164,000 will be paid from a Federal Surface Transportation grant. The remaining $201,100 will be paid out of the general fund and by the special assessment of just $1,626.

Approval of the design contract for the Barton Drive and Scio Church stretches of new sidewalk was approved by the city council at its March 3, 2014 meeting.

By way of additional background, at its July 15, 2013 meeting, the council approved $15,000 for preliminary design of a sidewalk along Barton Drive. And at its Nov. 19, 2012 meeting, the council approved $15,000 for preliminary study of a sidewalk to be constructed along Scio Church, west of Seventh Street. On Nov. 7, 2013, the council approved another $35,000 for Scio Church sidewalk design work. The design contract for the Barton Drive and Scio Church stretches of new sidewalk, drew on the previously authorized funding.

The preliminary planning budget of $15,000 for the Newport Road sidewalk gap was approved over a year ago by the council at its Jan. 23, 2013 meeting.

Location of proposed Barton Drive sidewalk.

Purple indicates stretches of Scio Church Road where no sidewalk exists.

Newport Road sidewalk stretch.

Land Use

Three site plans appear on the council’s April 21 agenda: Concordia University’s proposed gym expansion; an expansion of an office building on Collingwood; and the overhaul of a Shell station on South State.

Land Use: Concordia University Gym Expansion

A site plan to expand the existing Concordia University gym is on the agenda for city council approval.

Aerial view of Concordia campus.

Land Use: Collingwood Office Building

The council will be asked to approve a site plan that expands an office building at 278-280 Collingwood. The proposal received a recommendation of approval from the Ann Arbor planning commission at its March 18, 2014 meeting.

Aerial view indicating location of 278-280 Collingwood Drive.

The site plan calls for removing the existing second floor on the east side of the office building and constructing a 2,451-square-foot second floor over the entire building for office use.

Land Use: Shell Station Overhaul

The council will be asked to approve the overhaul of a Shell station and a new drive-thru restaurant at 2991 S. State. The site is located at the northeast corner of the East Eisenhower Parkway and South State Street.

Aerial view of the site for a Shell station and drive-thru restaurant at the northeast corner of South State and East Eisenhower.

The specific restaurant to be located there is still being negotiated. [.pdf of staff report]

Environmental Commission Appointments

Also on the April 21 agenda are the appointments to the environmental commission for Kirk Westphal, David Stead, and Susan Hutton. All three would be re-appointments.

Westphal is being put forward as the planning commission’s representative to the environmental commission. He currently serves as chair of that commission. The planning commission voted at its Jan. 23, 2014 meeting to recommend Westphal’s reappointment. Westphal did not participate in the vote on that recommendation.

Westphal, a Democrat, is contesting the Ward 2 seat to which Sally Petersen is not seeking re-election – because she is running for mayor. Nancy Kaplan, who’s currently a member of the Ann Arbor District Library board, is running for that same Ward 2 seat.

In 2013, mayor John Hieftje declined to nominate Jeff Hayner to serve on the public art commission, citing a policy against nominating candidates for city council to serve on city boards and commissions. Hayner ran for Ward 1 council against Sabra Briere that year – a race in which Briere prevailed.

However, appointments to the environmental commission are different from most other appointments to boards and commissions – in that the mayor does not nominate them. The appointments are under control of the council as a body.

David Stead, right, reads a resolution he proposed at an environmental commission meeting in 2009. The resolution, which was approved, recommended removing Argo Dam. At left is Margie Teall, a city councilmember who also sat on the environmental commission at the time.

Past practice as been for the appointments to the environmental commission to mimic the typical two-step mayoral appointment process – with nomination at one meeting followed by confirmation at the next meeting. The council has customarily had the environmental commission appointments on its agenda for initial consideration and postponed a vote until the next meeting.

Stead was originally described in the agenda item as having served on the commission since 2007. That was subsequently corrected. City records in Legistar indicate he was among the first members to be appointed, on Sept. 18, 2000 after the council established the commission in a resolution approved on April 3, 2000. Based on Legistar records, he has served continuously since that initial appointment. Stead also served on the city council representing Ward 5 from April 1993 through November 1994.

Stead is vice president of Resource Recycling Systems. City council minutes show that the council has approved roughly $300,000 in contracts for consulting work by RRS for the city of Ann Arbor between 2007 and 2009.

Hutton was first appointed to the environmental commission in 2011 and is concluding her first three-year term.

4:42 p.m. Now available in Legistar are the staff responses to councilmember questions about agenda items: Agenda Responses 4-21-14. Also available are the slides for the city administrator’s FY 2015 budget presentation.

5:36 p.m. Here’s the spreadsheet referenced in the agenda response items: .pdf of budgets for Phase 1 Ann Arbor Housing Commission Projects

6:10 p.m. Based on councilmember questions posed to staff, deliberations on the outdoor smoking regulations and the sidewalk special assessments could be drawn out. Jack Eaton (Ward 4) posed a series of questions asking about the cost of educational efforts and the cost of posting a no-smoking sign ($70 without a post and $120 with a post). And a question was posed on the use of federal surface transportation funds for one of the sidewalk special assessment projects but not for a previous project. (Both projects were eligible, but funds were not available for the Pontiac Trail project.) A question on the number of terms David Stead has already served on the environmental commission (4 terms) hints at a likely debate over his appointment.

6:13 p.m. Community Television Network tech has installed and tested microphones. Testing includes wiggling them back and forth, which generates a prodigious amount of static.

6:45 p.m. Channel 2, Detroit’s Fox News affiliate, is here to film the possible action on the outdoor smoking regulations. Cameraman is chatting with Cliff Douglas, director of the University of Michigan’s Tobacco Research Network.

6:57 p.m. Chambers are starting to fill with audience and councilmembers.

6:57 p.m. Pre-meeting activity. The scheduled meeting start is 7 p.m. Most evenings the actual starting time is between 7:10 p.m. and 7:15 p.m.

7:06 p.m. We’re off.

7:07 p.m. Call to order, moment of silence, pledge of allegiance.

7:07 p.m. Roll call of council. All councilmembers, except for Sabra Briere (Ward 1) are present and correct.

7:08 p.m. Mayor John Hieftje indicates that Briere will be arriving a bit later.

7:08 p.m. Approval of agenda The volunteer of the month proclamation is moved ahead of the budget presentation.

7:08 p.m. Outcome: The council has approved the agenda.

7:09 p.m. INT-2 Volunteer of the Month. This proclamation honors Dorothy Hastings for her volunteer efforts to improve Cloverdale Park.

7:11 p.m. INT-1 City Administrator’s FY 2015 Budget Presentation. For background on the proposed budget see: “FY 2015 Budget Preview: Cops, Trees” [.pdf of April 21, 2014 pre-dated memo from Powers to city council]

7:13 p.m. Powers is reviewing the council’s priority areas. He’s reviewing the work sessions that were held earlier in the year. May 12 will be a work session on public safety and infrastructure.

7:14 p.m. Revenues are improving modestly, Powers says. Property taxes are up 2.4%.

7:15 p.m. State shared revenue from sales taxes is up 4%. Road funding from Act 51 is flat. City millages will remain unchanged from last year.

7:16 p.m. Pension contributions are up 10% and VEBA is up 2%.

7:17 p.m. Here again are the slides Powers is presenting: [.pdf of slides]

7:17 p.m. The budget reflects two major impacts, Powers says: impact of GASB 68 accounting standards; and $1 million for street tree maintenance.

7:18 p.m. Powers is reviewing the historical trend of the number of employees. Y axis on the chart starts at 500, so the trend is somewhat amplified.

7:19 p.m. Powers is reviewing the addition of three police officers and one firefighter. A rental housing inspector will also be added.

7:21 p.m. The $1 million for streets in the public right-of-way is based on the significant deferred maintenance that has accumulated. He’s now reviewing the difference between recurring and one-time revenues. Post-employment health insurance funding is tied to revenue growth, Powers says.

7:22 p.m. He’s about to wrap up, as it’s not meant to be an in-depth review. As much opportunity as councilmembers would like can be provided to go over the budget, he says.

7:22 p.m. Powers notes that this is the second year of a two-year planning cycle, even though the council adopts a budget every year.

7:24 p.m. Because it’s in the second year of a two-year plan, Powers doesn’t think this budget reflects a lot of substantial changes. Powers notes that amendments to the budget can be undertaken after the budget has been adopted to improve the ability of the staff to deliver on city goals.

7:24 p.m. Budget questions will receive answers on a weekly basis through next month when the council must adopt the budget. Powers is now done with his presentation.

7:24 p.m. Public commentary. This portion of the meeting offers 10 three-minute slots that can be reserved in advance. Preference is given to speakers who want to address the council on an agenda item. [Public commentary general time, with no sign-up required in advance, is offered at the end of the meeting.] Tonight’s lineup for reserved time speaking includes Kermit Schlansker, Lou Glorie and Alan Haber.

7:28 p.m. Kermit Schlansker is talking about the importance of geometry in attaining sustainability. Big cities have less use of energy per capita than small towns, he says. Geometry is more important than solar or wind. But big cities can’t grow food, he says. Geometry is important in considering travel distances between the places where food is grown and where it’s consumed. People need to learn to use sewage for fertilizer. He describes burying people when they die and planting a fruit tree on top of them: “I’d rather become a useful apple”… than spend the energy on cremation, he says. If we don’t pay attention to the future there will be no future, he concludes.

7:32 p.m. Lou Glorie introduces herself as an Ann Arbor resident. She says that the Ann Arbor Area Transportation Authority millage request is being framed as a question about public transit and as a moral obligation. But there are legitimate reasons for opposing the millage, she says. She contends that the system is still difficult if not impossible to use, because of the downtown-centric system. The system only makes sense if one assumes that everyone wants to go downtown. Someone on North Maple might want to get to Briarwood, she says. It costs between $7,000 and $15,000 to maintain a car, but they have no other way to get around. The AAATA’s service model is more appropriate for those who live outside Ann Arbor than for residents. It’s not just okay to vote no, she says. It might be the only way to get the kind of transportation system for residents that we need.

7:35 p.m. Alan Haber is talking about his efforts to establish a public part on the top of the Library Lane underground parking structure. When he’d approached the Downtown Development Authority to ask how that land could be used for the public, the DDA had said that’s not their mission, because they focus on economic development, he says. He’s describing his unsuccessful effort to get the DDA to allow an Earth Day event on top of the Library Lane parking structure to take place this year. He calls for a public discussion of the maximum public use of the space. He’s got a list of people in this town who have a lot of money, he says.

7:35 p.m. Communications from council.

7:37 p.m. Christopher Taylor (Ward 3) says that the three additional police officers are welcome, but he’s not yet clear about what their responsibilities will be. He holds the door open for amendments to the budget. He also reports that he’s asked Steve Powers to see if the city has resources to do targeted enforcement of additional community standards in campus areas. He’s looking forward to a report that’s due in May on meeting environmental goals.

7:38 p.m. Sally Petersen (Ward 2) announced there will be a meeting on the AAATA millage proposal on April 29 at 7 p.m. at the Earhardt Village club house.

7:41 p.m. Jane Lumm (Ward 2) is giving announcements related to Humane Society of Huron Valley animal control services. She says that the Humane Society has given the city invoices that have not yet been paid. She says a meeting has been scheduled to move the ball forward.

Lumm is now talking about the deer population. She calls for developing a strategy for dealing with the problem. She’ll be bringing forward a resolution concerning that. On the budget, she says she’s tried unsuccessfully to add police officers, so she’s glad to see that. She calls on the DDA to come forward with funding for downtown beat cops.

7:41 p.m. Briere has arrived.

7:45 p.m. Chuck Warpehoski (Ward 5) reports out on a public meeting on the Jackson Road reconstruction project. He’s talking with MDOT to find out how the pilot project for the lane striping (three lanes with the center lane a turn lane). He’s responding to Lou Glorie’s comments during public commentary. About the AAATA millage, he says that the new service plan includes some cross-town routes that are not part of the hub-and-spoke plan. He notes that because Ann Arbor is not laid out on a grid, it poses a challenge. He stresses the importance of frequency in providing adequate service. He points to proposed Route G as a connection that would help cross-town connections.

7:47 p.m. Jack Eaton (Ward 4) reminds people of the Friends of Dicken Woods fundraiser on April 24. The Friends have taken care of the nature area for 10 years and fund education programs at the neighboring elementary school: dickenwoods.org

7:48 p.m. MC-1 Confirmations. Several confirmations are on tonight’s agenda – of nominations that were made at the council’s April 7, 2014 meeting:

Airport Advisory Committee: Mary Karen McClellan (filling a vacancy, for a term ending May 30, 2016);
Ann Arbor Housing Commission: Gwenyth Hayes (serving out rest of term for Gloria Black as a residents’ representative, through May 4, 2015) and Daniel Lee (re-appointment, for a term ending May 6, 2019);
Design Review Board: Shannan Gibb-Randall (serving out rest of term for Mary Jucari, through May 30, 2015);
Employees Retirement Systems Board of Trustees: Mark Heusel (re-appointment for a term through May 2, 2017);
Public Market Advisory Commission: David Santacroce (re-appointment for a term through May 30, 2017).

7:49 p.m. Briere notes that Santacroce has celebrated the birth of his second child today. Stephen Kunselman (Ward 3) congratulates Santacroce, and gets clarification that Santacroce also serves on the park advisory commission.

7:50 p.m. Outcome: The appointments are all confirmed.

7:50 p.m. Public Hearings. All the public hearings are grouped together during this section of the meeting. Action on the related items comes later in the meeting. Four public hearings are scheduled: (1) Outdoor smoking ordinance [for additional background, see Smoking above]; (2) Concordia University gym expansion [for additional background, see Land Use: Concordia University Gym Expansion above]; (3) Collingwood office building expansion [for additional background, see Land Use: Collingwood Office Building above]; and (4) State Street Shell station site plan [for additional background, see Land Use: Shell Station Overhaul above].

7:50 p.m. PH-1 Outdoor Smoking Ordinance.

7:53 p.m. Leon Bryson, who’s running for Ward 5 council, is addressing the council. He’s speaking in support of the ordinance that is being proposed by Chuck Warpehoski (Ward 5) [against whom he's running]. There are two main components of this ordinance: places where smoking would be banned; and the enforcement. The 20-foot distance is reasonable, he says. The city administrator is given a great amount of authority to set areas for non-smoking in public parks. It’s not his expectation that the city administrator would ban smoking in all areas of all city parks. Based on the discussion at the last council meeting, Bryson does not think enforcement will be a problem. He does not expect that the ordinance will be enforced in a way that has a disparate impact on the homeless. He thanks Warpehoski for his work.

7:56 p.m. Jeff Hayner asks the council to modify the ordinance in light of another problem: chewing gum. It’s not a problem unique to Ann Arbor. In Great Britain, they spent $230 million on removal of chewing gum, he says. He suggests that we look to Singapore as a model, which restricted the trade and use of chewing gum. Smuggling fines can go up to $3,000 or a beating with a bamboo cane. So he asks for the ordinance to be modified to include a fine for littering of cigarette butts and a ban on chewing gum.

8:01 p.m. Seth Best rises to speak against the ordinance because he thinks it will have a disparate impact on the homeless, the poor and the LGBT community. He notes that it’s legal to purchase cigarettes. He says there are more important things to worry about that are more worthy of the council’s time. Going after smokers is a way to push those who are poor and the homeless further away. He thanks the council for modifying the original proposal to include community service instead of a fine.

8:02 p.m. Colin Yee is addressing the council as a graduate student in public health in support of the ordinance. As a student over the last six years, he’s noticed a decline in smokers as a result of a tobacco-free campus initiative. There’s less of a haze walking across the Diag, he says. The ordinance further reduces the social acceptability of smoking and will reduce the exposure of young people to second hand smoke. It’s time to walk the walk and show why we are the leaders and the best, he says.

8:05 p.m. Julie Grand, who’s running for Ward 3 council, speaks in support of the ordinance. She has passed out some best practices for health policy. This policy has to balance individual liberty with public good. The benefits outweigh the burden on individual liberty, she says. She’ll be able to point to a sign next to a swingset and ask someone to refrain from smoking. Do we want high school students to be standing at a bus stop near smokers, she asks? [Grand is a lecturer in public health at University of Michigan, Dearborn]. She points to the fact that enforcement of the ban in restaurants has not been problematic.

8:08 p.m. Cliff Douglas thanks the council for its 8-3 vote on first reading at its previous meeting. The support that the council is hearing tonight is typical of public sentiment, he says. These ordinances save lives, he says, as they keep smoke away from infants. These ordinances also reduce litter from cigarettes, he says. No-smoking rules will join other, familiar rules for public parks, like no alcohol, and no dogs offleash. He’s now reading a letter from the manager of the People’s Food Co-op who contend with smokers at Sculpture Plaza.

8:09 p.m. Channel 2 cameraman unhooks TV microphone from the podium.

8:09 p.m. PH-2 Concordia University gymnasium addition. No one speaks at this public hearing.

8:10 p.m. PH-3 278-280 Collingwood site plan. No one speaks at this public hearing.

8:10 p.m. PH-4 State Street Shell station/drive-thru. No one speaks at this public hearing.

8:10 p.m. Minutes of previous meeting. Outcome: The council has voted to approve the minutes of the previous meeting.

8:10 p.m. Consent Agenda. This is a group of items that are deemed to be routine and are voted on “all in one go.” Contracts for less than $100,000 can be placed on the consent agenda. This meeting’s consent agenda includes:

CA-1 Approve a payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) for the AAHC for North Maple Estates, North Maple Duplexes, Lower Platt, Broadway, and White/State/Henry Apartments. [For additional background, see AAHC: PILOT above]
CA-2 Approve AAHC site plan and zoning fee waiver request Maple and Platt. [For additional background, see AAHC: 50% Waiver above]
CA-3 Award a Contract to DLZ Michigan, Inc. to design repairs to the wastewater treatment plant access bridge ($32,752).
CA-4 Resolution No. 2: Newport sidewalk special assessment. [For additional background, see Sidewalks above]
CA-5 Resolution No. 3: Establish a public hearing for the Newport sidewalk special assessment project
CA-6 Approve an emergency increase to the Osburn Industries Purchase Order for Aggregate Materials ($36,750).
CA-7 Approve street closing for the NTI Block Party: July 30, 2014.
CA-8 Approve street closing for the 2014 Ann Arbor Summer Festival’s Top of the Park (June 9 through July 9, 2014).
CA-9 Approve street closings for the 2014 Rolling Sculpture Car Show (Friday, July 11, 2014).

8:11 p.m. Councilmembers can opt to select out any items for separate consideration. Sabra Briere pulls out CA-1 and CA-2.

8:11 p.m. CA-1 Approve a payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) for the AAHC for North Maple Estates, North Maple Duplexes, Lower Platt, Broadway, and White/State/Henry Apartments.

8:13 p.m. Briere says she wanted to pull this out because it’s an example of every creative effort that the city can find to help the AAHC. She commends staff for being creative in solving the problem.

8:13 p.m. Outcome: The council approved CA-1.

8:13 p.m. CA-2 Approve AAHC site plan and zoning fee waiver request Maple and Platt. Briere says this is another example of creativity to help the AAHC.

8:13 p.m. Outcome: The council approved CA-2.

8:14 p.m. Outcome: The council now completed its approval of all items on the consent agenda.

8:14 p.m. B-1 Outdoor Smoking Ordinance. This is the final approval of a new law regulating smoking in some outdoor locations. It was given initial approval by the council on April 7. The law would regulate smoking outside of public buildings and also potentially in areas of some city parks. Made punishable under the proposed ordinance through a $50 civil fine would be smoking within 20 feet of: (1) bus stops; (2) entrances, windows and ventilation systems of the Blake Transit Center; and (3) entrances, windows and ventilation systems any city-owned building. Community service could be ordered instead of the payment of a fine. The ordinance would also authorize the city administrator to have signs posted designating certain parks or portions of parks as off limits for outdoor smoking, and to increase the distance from entrances to city buildings where outdoor smoking is prohibited. Where no signs are posted noting the smoking prohibition, a citation could be issued only if someone doesn’t stop smoking immediately when asked to stop. [For additional background, see Smoking above]

8:15 p.m. Chuck Warpehoski (Ward 5) is reviewing some amendments that have been made. The buffer around bus stops has been reduced to 10 feet, after consultation with AAATA. And the language describing the non-smoking zone around Blake Transit Center has been tweaked.

8:18 p.m. Warpehoski is addressing the argument based on disparate impact, saying that it’s a public health impact that can have a positive effect on lower-income populations. He reminds people that the fine is only levied if they fail to stop smoking when asked to do so by a police officer.

8:19 p.m. Stephen Kunselman (Ward 3) is proposing that the fine be reduced from $50 to $25. It’s greater than the marijuana possession fine of $25. He felt that smoking a cigarette should be on par with that. The amendment is accepted as friendly by Warpehoski.

8:21 p.m. Kunselman says he’s going to support the ordinance, thanking Warpehoski for bringing forward some very convincing speakers at the last council meeting. On a personal note, his stepdad passed away over the weekend – and he was a life-long smoker, so Kunselman felt there was nothing he could do except vote for the ordinance.

8:24 p.m. Jane Lumm (Ward 2) is reviewing the issue of police resources. She says that if the ordinance is self-enforcing, then she wonders why there needs to be police enforcement. Any time a police officer spends on this is time that could be spent on more important issues, she says. Lumm says she lives next to a large park and says she sometimes quips that it’s the city’s largest off-leash dog park – because the city doesn’t have the means to enforce that or many other issues. She doesn’t think the decision on areas for non-smoking in parks should be left to the city administrator. Lumm notes that she’s a staunch non-smoker – and you can ask her husband what happens when he lights up a cigar.

8:28 p.m. Jack Eaton (Ward 4) thanks Kunselman for the amendment. Not making it punitive is a step in the right direction. He’s against diverting police resources to a public health issue. These are issues that are best addressed through education, he says. This is fraught with potential for conflict – because a smoker who is asked to stop smoking by a civilian would know that a police officer could not possibly arrive soon enough to enforce the ordinance. Banning smoking, for example, in Sculpture Plaza, will simply move smokers to other locations. He ventures that the cost of placing signs will be greater than the cost that was given by the city administrator [$70 without a pole, $120 with a pole].

8:29 p.m. Christopher Taylor (Ward 3) says he’ll support the ordinance, because it’s reasonable, prudent and measured. It’s public health problem and an environmental problem, he says, that is being solved. This provides non-smokers with the tools to educate smokers, he says.

8:29 p.m. Taylor says this will help create a set of social norms that says that smoking is not acceptable in these locations.

8:31 p.m. Sabra Briere (Ward 1) said after Sunday night caucus the smoker’s corner was set up right next to the ventilation system on the Ann Street side of city hall. She also noticed the litter of cigarette butts. She appreciated the concern of councilmembers who were concerned that police would be required to run hither and yon to monitor smokers. Briere allows that Jane Lumm (Ward 2) is right that there are not enough resources to monitor other issues – like offleash dogs.

8:34 p.m. Briere is talking about problems with enforcing the leash laws. She says the penalty for this ordinance is small. Mothers don’t take their children to a park near her house until they spend time picking up cigarette butts, because they don’t want their children to eat cigarette butts. We should think about those people who want to use the city’s parks and feel like they’re being crowded out of the parks by smokers.

8:36 p.m. Margie Teall (Ward 4) says she’s supported this from the beginning. She thanks Warpehoski for putting a lot of time and thought into it. As Julie Grand suggested, Teall thinks it might help shift social norms.

8:39 p.m. Mayor John Hieftje says he will support this. He doesn’t have a concern about the policing of this –because 900 other communities aren’t finding their police forces are tied up dealing with smokers.

8:39 p.m. Mike Anglin (Ward 5) says that everything that can be said has already been said. He thanks Warpehoski for revising the punitive parts of the original proposal. When someone sits near him and is smoking, he has to move, Anglin says.

8:39 p.m. Outcome: The council has voted to give the outdoor smoking ordinance final approval, over dissent from Eaton and Lumm.

8:39 p.m. DC-1 Environmental Commission appointments. Nominations to the environmental commission are the council’s privilege to make, not the mayor’s. On tonight’s agenda are three re-appointments: Kirk Westphal as the planning commission’s recommended appointment as that group’s representative on the environmental commission; David Stead, who’s served on the environmental commission since it was established in 2000; and Susan Hutton who’s completed her first three-year term. [For additional background, see Environmental Commission Appointments above]

8:40 p.m. Briere moves to postpone, as it’s customary to do so for EC appointments.

8:40 p.m. Outcome: The council has voted to postpone consideration of the EC appointments.

8:40 p.m. DB-1 Site Plan: Concordia University Gymnasium Addition This item approves a site plan for the expansion of the gym at Concordia University. The plan also includes reconfiguring nearby parking lots and stormwater management features on the 187-acre site at 4090 Geddes Road, just west of US-23 and north of the Huron River. The city planning commission recommended approval of the site plan at its March 4, 2014 meeting. [For additional background, see Land Use: Concordia University Gym Expansion above]

8:40 p.m. Lumm is reading aloud a description of the project.

8:41 p.m. Lumm thanks the CEO of Concordia for answering all her questions.

8:43 p.m. Petersen also thanks the CEO of Concordia.

8:43 p.m. Lumm is concurring with Petersen’s thanks. Lumm said that she’d heard from people who were interested in what was going on across the street from Concordia. Longer term, they’re thinking about building a football stadium. No site plan has been submitted to the city on that, she says.

8:43 p.m. Outcome: The council has voted to approve the Concordia University gym expansion site plan.

8:43 p.m. DB-2 Site Plan: 278-280 Collingwood. This item approves a site plan that expands an office building at 278-280 Collingwood. The site plan calls for removing the existing second floor on the east side of the office building and constructing a 2,451-square-foot second floor over the entire building for office use. [For additional background, see Land Use: Collingwood Office Building above]

8:43 p.m. Outcome: The council has voted without discussion to approve the Collingwood site plan.

8:43 p.m. DB-3 Site Plan: State Street Shell station/drive-thru restaurant. The council is being asked to approve the overhaul of a Shell station and a new drive-thru restaurant at 2991 S. State. The site is located at the northeast corner of the East Eisenhower Parkway and South State Street. [For additional background, see Land Use: Shell Station Overhaul above]

8:43 p.m. Outcome: The council has voted to approve the Shell station site plan.

8:43 p.m. DS-1 Approve transfer of $600,000 from the affordable housing trust fund to the Ann Arbor Housing Commission. At its March 3, 2014 meeting, the council had directed the city administrator to prepare a budget resolution that would allocate $600,000 from the city’s affordable housing trust fund to support the AAHC’s plan to renovate its properties. That allocation was to be contingent on the closing of the sale of the former Y lot to Dennis Dahlmann, as the net proceeds of that sale are to be deposited into the city’s affordable housing trust fund. The sale of the property closed on April 2. So on tonight’s meeting agenda is the resolution the council had directed the city administrator to prepare.

8:44 p.m. Outcome: The council has voted to approve the $600,000 transfer.

8:44 p.m. DS-2 Accept easement for sanitary sewer. This would accept an easement for a sanitary sewer from Subaru Research and Development Inc. at 3995 Research Park Dr.

8:45 p.m. Outcome: The council has voted without discussion to approve the easement.

8:45 p.m. DS-3 Approve agreement with Black and Veatch for the water treatment plant alternatives analysis project ($220,339). According to the staff memo accompanying this item, the goal of the water treatment plant alternatives analysis project is “to evaluate the need and feasibility for addressing several challenges facing the water treatment plant, including the replacement of the Plant 1 treatment basins.” The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) evaluates all public water system every three years. And the Michigan Safe Drinking Water Act (Act 399) requires all public water systems to complete a master plan every so often. Included in the 2013 MDEQ evaluation and the city’s own 2006 master plan are recommendations that the treatment basins be modified or replaced. The memo describes the facilities as follows: “The basins were built in 1938, are inefficient, do not meet current recommended design standards, and have exceeded their useful life. These basins provide reliability on average days and capacity during peak demand periods.”

8:48 p.m. Anglin has asked public area administrator Craig Hupy to come to the podium to answer questions. Anglin says that it appears the scope of work will allow the staff to make some decisions. He asks if Hupy would be considering delivering water on the west side of the city for less money. No, says Hupy. This project would evaluate the options – from replacing in-kind at that location, to purchasing wholesale from elsewhere. Anglin wants to know the timeline. Hupy says the design process would come in FY 2017 with construction in FY 2018 or FY 2019. Anglin ventures that this project will have huge implications for the city.

8:48 p.m. Outcome: The council has voted to approve the agreement with Black and Veatch for the water treatment plant alternatives analysis project.

8:48 p.m. DS-4 Award contract to Evergreen Civil LLC ($616,806) for the Yellowstone water main replacement project. This project will replace the existing water main with about 1,700 feet of new 8-inch water main. The existing water main on Yellowstone Drive, bounded by Bluett Drive on both ends, had experienced frequent breaks and is in poor condition, according to the staff memo accompanying this resolution.

8:50 p.m. Lumm says that residents could not be happier. This main has had multiple breaks, she says. She’s happy the construction will start in May and be done in July. The public meeting at Clague Middle School was helpful, Lumm says. She calls it great customer service by the staff.

8:50 p.m. Outcome: The council has voted to award the contract to Evergreen Civil LLC ($616,806) for the Yellowstone water main replacement project.

8:50 p.m. DS-5 Scio Church sidewalk: Approve the Scio Church and Barton sidewalks project appropriation of funds from the general fund ($177,100). The council is being asked to approve $177,100 of city funds for the construction of a Scio Church sidewalk and for an additional sidewalk on Barton Drive. Like the Scio Church sidewalk project, the Barton Drive sidewalk will be special assessed – with the associated resolutions to be presented to the council at a future meeting. [For additional background, see Sidewalks above.]

8:54 p.m. Teall is thanking Peter Houk for his advocacy on the Scio Church sidewalk, which began several years ago. Eaton echoes Teall’s sentiments, saying that it will be an important addition. The link to the Pittsfield branch of the Ann Arbor District Library will be important, he says.

8:55 p.m. Kailasapathy says she and Briere had attended a lot of neighborhood meetings on this issue. Roads, traffic calming, and sidewalk gaps seem to be topics that are of great concern for residents, she says. So this is a very good move to help make the city’s parks more accessible to children.

8:57 p.m. Kunselman appreciates the financing that’s been used, and goes as far as to propose that the special assessments be eliminated. He wants to take that money out of the general fund and make it a city-funded project. Hieftje proposes a short recess to work out that language.

8:57 p.m. We are in recess.

9:08 p.m. We’re back.

9:09 p.m. Kunselman says that in the future he wants to make sure that 80% of the funding is provided through non-special assessed funds. But he’ll support this resolution at this time.

9:09 p.m. Outcome: The council has voted to approve the appropriation of funds from the general fund for the Scio Church and Barton Road sidewalk projects.

9:10 p.m. DS-6 Scio Church sidewalk: Resolution No. 2 Special Assessment ($1,626). This is the second in a series of resolutions necessary for a special assessment, directing the setting of the assessment roll. For the Scio Church Road sidewalk project, the total cost is expected to be $365,100. Of that, about $164,000 will be paid from a Federal Surface Transportation grant. The remaining $201,100 will be paid out of the general fund and by a special assessment of just $1,626.

9:11 p.m. Kunselman asks that this be postponed. The amount to be special assessed isn’t worth the amount that will be special assessed, he says. Eaton seconds.

9:11 p.m. Hupy indicates that the second meeting in May would be a good meeting to which to postpone, because the Barton Drive special assessment could then be brought forward at the same time.

9:14 p.m. Hieftje says that he doesn’t want to set a precedent – given the number of people who have needed to pay a special assessment. Hieftje says he’ll support the postponement, but says that the issue needs a larger discussion. Kailasapathy notes that general funds are limited, and she’s afraid that a commitment to using general funds might stall the process of filling sidewalk gaps.

Briere says there’s an issue of legal equity. The council just earlier in the evening approved the special assessment for Newport’s sidewalk. She notes that property owners who weren’t legally required to contribute had stepped forward and volunteered. Those residents will feel that the city has really “offended” them if the city pays for other projects out of the general fund.

9:17 p.m. Lumm agrees with Briere and Kailasapathy. “If we do this here, we gotta do it citywide,” she says. The history of the way these improvements have been done needs to be recognized, Lumm says. Hieftje calls Hupy to the podium. He wants to know if the project would be delayed if this is postponed until the second meeting in May.

9:18 p.m. Kailasapathy ventures that there could be a de minimis rule that if the total amount is less than $1,000 then the city would pay.

9:20 p.m. Kunselman asks why the city is so gung ho about eliminating sidewalk gaps that have been there for decades. He calls it “ridiculous” that the city is setting up a special assessment for a little more than $1,000. In his neighborhood, there’d been a project that was originally planned to include sidewalks and the plan was to special assess 100% of the cost. The result was that no sidewalks accompanied the project, because neighbors objected.

9:20 p.m. Hieftje notes that everyone seems inclined to postpone.

9:21 p.m. Outcome: The council has voted to postpone the setting of the assessment roll for the Scio Church sidewalk project until the second meeting in May.

9:21 p.m. DS-7 Scio Church sidewalk: Resolution No. 3 Set public hearing. This is the third in a series of resolutions required for a special assessment. The public hearing is being set for May 5, 2014, the council’s first meeting in May.

9:21 p.m. Kunselman also wants to postpone this one.

9:21 p.m. Outcome: The council has voted postpone the setting of the public hearing on the Scio Church sidewalk project special assessment.

9:22 p.m. Communications from council. Lumm is asking that an LDFA issue come to the council at its next meeting, not May 19.

9:22 p.m. Clerk’s report of communications, petitions and referrals. Outcome: The council has approved the clerk’s report.

9:22 p.m. Public comment. There’s no requirement to sign up in advance for this slot for public commentary.

9:22 p.m. No one rises to speak.

9:22 p.m. Adjournment. We are now adjourned. That’s all from the hard benches.

A sign on the door to the Ann Arbor city council chambers gives instructions for post-meeting clean-up.

The Chronicle survives in part through regular voluntary subscriptions to support our coverage of public bodies like the Ann Arbor city council. If you’re already supporting The Chronicle please encourage your friends, neighbors and coworkers to do the same. Click this link for details: Subscribe to The Chronicle.

April 21, 2014: City Council Meeting Preview

Dave Askins — Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:30:03 +0000

Screenshot of Legistar – the city of Ann Arbor’s online agenda management system. Image links to the April 21, 2014 meeting agenda.

Related to this year’s budget is an agenda item for April 21 that will transfer $600,000 from the affordable housing trust fund to the Ann Arbor Housing Commission. The city administrator had been directed by the council to prepare the budget amendment at its March 3, 2014 meeting. The action was contingent on the final closing of the sale of the former Y lot – net proceeds of which were roughly $1.4 million and were deposited into the affordable housing trust fund. The $600,000 will support AAHC’s efforts to make major capital improvements to its public housing properties.

Related to sidewalks as part of the city’s non-motorized infrastructure will be a possible attachment to the council’s agenda from the city administrator that outlines his plan to “to fund, effect, and otherwise implement actionable near-term recommendations of the 2013 Update to the Non-Motorized Transportation Plan.” The council gave direction to the city administrator at its Dec. 16, 2013 meeting to provide the report – as one of a series of updates.

The April 21 agenda also includes the authorization for some street closings for upcoming events: NTI Block Party (July 30, 2014), Rolling Sculpture Car Show (July 11, 2014), and Ann Arbor Summer Festival’s Top of the Park (June 9 through July 9, 2014).

Ann Arbor Housing Commission

AAHC: $600,000 Transfer

That allocation would be contingent on the closing of the sale of the former Y lot to Dennis Dahlmann, as the net proceeds of that sale are to be deposited into the city’s affordable housing trust fund. The sale of the property closed on April 2.

So on the April 21 meeting agenda is the resolution the council had directed the city administrator to prepare.

AAHC: PILOT

AAHC: 50% Waiver

North Maple: $8,995 for site plan approval; $1,425 for zoning approval; and $2,565 for street vacation
Lower Platt: $8,295 for site plan approval; $1,425 for zoning approval

The item on the council’s April 21 agenda would reduce the fees by 50%.

Smoking

Where no signs are posted noting the smoking prohibition, a citation could be issued only if someone doesn’t stop smoking immediately when asked to stop.

A public hearing on the new ordinance will be held at the April 21 meeting.

Chuck Warpehoski (Ward 5), sponsor of the proposed new local law, appeared before the city’s park advisory commission on Feb. 25, 2014 to brief commissioners on the proposal and solicit feedback.

Council deliberations on this item are included in The Chronicle’s live updates filed during the April 7 meeting.

Sidewalks

Approval of the design contract for the Barton Drive and Scio Church stretches of new sidewalk was approved by the city council at its March 3, 2014 meeting.

The preliminary planning budget of $15,000 for the Newport Road sidewalk gap was approved over a year ago by the council at its Jan. 23, 2013 meeting.

Location of proposed Barton Drive sidewalk.

Purple indicates stretches of Scio Church Road where no sidewalk exists.

Newport Road sidewalk stretch.

Non-Motorized Plan Implementation

As part of a resolution approved by the council at its Dec. 16, 2014 meeting, the city administrator is supposed to “report to city council by April 21, 2014, his plan to fund, effect, and otherwise implement actionable Near-term Recommendations of the 2013 Update to the Non-Motorized Transportation Plan.” That item could eventually be attached to the council’s April 21 meeting agenda.

Land Use

Land Use: Concordia University Gym Expansion

A site plan to expand the existing Concordia University gym is on the agenda for city council approval.

Aerial view of Concordia campus.

Land Use: Collingwood Office Building

Aerial view indicating location of 278-280 Collingwood Drive.

The site plan calls for removing the existing second floor on the east side of the office building and constructing a 2,451-square-foot second floor over the entire building for office use.

Land Use: Shell Station Overhaul

Aerial view of the site for a Shell station and drive-thru restaurant at the northeast corner of South State and East Eisenhower.

The specific restaurant to be located there is still being negotiated. [.pdf of staff report]

Environmental Commission Appointments

Also on the April 21 agenda are the appointments to the environmental commission for Kirk Westphal, David Stead, and Susan Hutton. All three would be re-appointments.

Westphal, a Democrat, has taken out petitions to contest the Ward 2 seat to which Sally Petersen is not seeking re-election – because she is running for mayor. He has until April 22 to file those petitions with the required 100 signatures. Nancy Kaplan, who’s currently a member of the Ann Arbor District Library board, has already filed petitions to run for that same Ward 2 seat.

Hutton was first appointed to the environmental commission in 2011 and is concluding her first three-year term.

The Chronicle could not survive without regular voluntary subscriptions to support our coverage of public bodies like the Ann Arbor city council. Click this link for details: Subscribe to The Chronicle. And if you’re already supporting The Chronicle, please encourage your friends, neighbors and colleagues to help support The Chronicle, too!

Planning Group Gives Advice to Council, UM

Mary Morgan — Sat, 29 Mar 2014 16:34:15 +0000

Ann Arbor planning commission meeting (March 18, 2014): The planning commission has weighed in with advice on the use of two publicly owned sites: the city-owned Library Lane in downtown Ann Arbor, and the former Edwards Brothers property on South State that’s being bought by the University of Michigan.

From left: Ann Arbor planning commissioners Wendy Woods, Jeremy Peters and Paras Parekh. (Photos by the writer.)

One day after the Ann Arbor city council took action related to the Library Lane site, planning commissioners made recommendations to the council about how to develop that South Fifth Avenue property. The council’s action on March 17 included asking the city administrator to hire a brokerage service to sell development rights to the Library Lane surface, on top of an underground parking structure. The council also voted, after a long debate, to designate part of the surface for an urban public park.

On March 18, the commission’s advice focused on conditions for developing the site that would garner economic benefits to the city, such as a mixed-use development that generates foot traffic, with an entry plaza or open space and a design that “creates an iconic addition to the skyline.” The recommendations drew on material in several existing documents, including the Connecting William Street report that was completed by the Ann Arbor Downtown Development Authority about a year ago.

After the vote, Sabra Briere – who serves on both the planning commission and the city council – noted that many members of council don’t believe that the Connecting William Street project was successful in its public outreach. She also said that many councilmembers “do not believe that maximizing density, scale and mass of a building on that site is in the public interest.” Briere said she hadn’t raised these issues during the commission’s deliberations because she didn’t want anyone to feel that she was trying to tell the planning commission what to do.

In separate action on March 18, commissioners passed a resolution with recommendations on uses for the Edwards Brothers site on South State Street, which the University of Michigan is acquiring. The intent is to encourage representatives from the city and UM to discuss their mutual interests in that area – weighing the university’s need to expand its facilities against the city’s interest in strengthening its tax base. Issues include the possible private development of the section that fronts South State, impact on the park-and-ride lot in that area, and the extension of Oakbrook Drive from South State to South Main, through UM property. The city council is expected to consider the same resolution at its April 7 meeting.

Further south on the State Street corridor, at the intersection with Eisenhower Parkway, a proposal to renovate the Shell station, tear down the car wash, and add a drive-thru restaurant was recommended for approval by the commission on March 18. The existing convenience store and gas station would remain open during construction. The specific drive-thru restaurant to be located there is still being negotiated, according to the owner.

Some of the discussion on this project related to upcoming ordinance revisions that the commission will consider on April 1 regulating drive-thru restaurants.

Also recommended for approval on March 18 were an expansion to an office on Collingwood near West Stadium Boulevard, and an easement related to a new Belle Tire on West Ellsworth.

Library Lane Site

On March 17, the Ann Arbor city council had passed a resolution directing the city administrator to hire a brokerage service to sell development rights to the Library Lane surface, where an underground parking structure is located. The council also engaged is a lengthy debate – two and a half hours of sometimes heated commentary – over a proposal reserving part of the surface for a publicly owned urban park. That resolution also passed, over dissent from mayor John Hieftje, Christopher Taylor (Ward 3) and Margie Teall (Ward 4).

The resolved clauses from the city council resolution passed on March 17 are:

RESOLVED, That City Council approve the reservation of the site for an urban public park of between approximately 6,500 and 12,000 square feet on the surface of the Library Lane Structure bounded by the Fifth Avenue sidewalk on the west, the Library Lane Street curb to the south, the western entry to the central elevator to the east, with the northern boundary to be determined at a future date;

RESOLVED, That the City will encourage the creative use of this space to commence on an occasional basis during the transition from parking to public park even before the urban park design and installation work is complete, and hereby requests that Community Services and the Park Department work together with DDA and the AADL to encourage groups to reserve the space for public activities including, but not limited to, craft fairs, book fairs, food carts, fine arts performances, and other activities and consider modification of permit requirements in order to eliminate fees for those seeking to put on public programs on the Library Lane site;

RESOLVED, That the City will work with the developer of the remaining portion of the Library Lane site to ensure that the designs for both spaces, an urban public park and the adjacent development, complement and support each other’s successful uses;

RESOLVED, That all development on the Library Lane site, whether public or private, will proceed in close collaboration with neighboring properties and businesses including, but not limited to the Ann Arbor District Library, First Martin Corporation, the University of Michigan Credit Union, the Inter-Cooperative Council, and the businesses fronting on Fifth Avenue and Liberty Street. Possible goals of this collaboration include:

Reorientation of the physical design and uses of these adjacent properties so that they help to create pedestrian interaction with the public park on the Library Lane Structure,

Creation of pedestrian walkways that connect the Library Lane Structure and public park to Liberty Plaza, Liberty Street and William Street;

Discussion about incentives, such as premiums or subsidies, that the City or DDA might offer to encourage both physical reorientation and pedestrian access/easements through adjacent properties, and

Consideration of possible joint development on the Library Lane Structure’s remaining build-able portion.

The following night at the March 18 planning commission meeting, commissioners Diane Giannola and Bonnie Bona brought forward a resolution that gave guidance to the council about the Library Lane site. It’s similar in intent to the recommendations that the commission gave to the council last year regarding the use of the former Y lot. Those recommendations were approved at the commission’s Aug. 20, 2013 meeting.

The planning commission resolution on the Library Lane structure makes recommendations about elements to include if the city sells the Library Lane development rights. [.pdf of advice resolution at start of March 18 meeting] [.pdf of advice resolution, as amended during March 18 meeting] The two resolved clauses, as amended during the March 18 meeting, are:

RESOLVED, that the City Planning Commission recommends to City Council that if the development rights over the “Library Lot” underground parking structure are sold, an RFQ/RFP process be utilized that conditions the sale of the property in order to obtain a long-term, ongoing and growing economic benefit for the residents of the city;

RESOLVED, that the City Planning Commission recommends to City Council that if the development rights over the “Library Lot” underground parking structure are sold, an RFP contain all of the following conditions:

A building that generates foot traffic, provides a human scale at the ground floor and creates visual appeal and contains active uses on all first floor street frontage and open space;

A requirement for an entry plaza or open space appropriately scaled and located to be properly activated by adjacent building uses and to be maintained by the developer;

A “mixed use” development with a density at around 700% FAR that takes advantage of the investment in footings and the mid-block location with active uses that have a high level of transparency fronting the plaza and at least 60% of Fifth Avenue and Library Lane frontages, while encouraging large floor plate office or lodging as a primary use, residential as a secondary use, and incorporating a cultural venue.

A requirement for the entry plaza or open space to incorporate generous landscaping;

A requirement that discourages surface parking, limits vehicular access for service areas to be located in alleys where available and prohibits service areas from being located on Fifth Avenue

To seek a design for this site that is meant to be visible on all four sides and that creates an iconic addition to the skyline;

A requirement for high quality construction; and

A request for a third party environmental certification (e.g., LEED Gold or Platinum)

The March 18 planning commission meeting included a public hearing on this item, but no one appeared at the public hearing to speak.

Library Lane: Report from Council

At the start of the March 18 meeting, Sabra Briere – who serves on the planning commission as the representative from city council – gave an update to commissioners about council action. She reported that the council approved designating a section of the Library Lane site as an urban park, bordered by Fifth Avenue on the west, Library Lane on the south, and the elevator stacks on the east. The northern border isn’t defined at this point, she noted. The council resolution states that the park will be between 6,500 and 12,000 square feet.

Paras Parekh and Sabra Briere.

The council also directed the city administrator to hire a broker to put up for sale the right to partner in a condominium arrangement on the remainder of the site, Briere said, rather than an outright sale of the land. It would allow a condominium partner to build there. It’s also possible that the successful respondent will design or construct or provide security or program the park, she noted.

What’s really important in all of this, Briere said, is that the city has opened the door to having a downtown park on the Library Lane site. The park advisory commission, the city administrator and the broker will help determine the details, she added.

Diane Giannola asked whether the council resolution stated “park” or “plaza.” The resolution states that it would be an “urban public park,” Briere replied. She noted that “those people who want to define it as trees and grass would be disappointed in this location.”

Giannola then asked what language had been deleted from the original resolution. Briere explained that the council deleted language that would have added the site to the city’s parks and recreation open space (PROS) plan and that would have required it to remain a city-owned public park. That was done because the council cannot, by fiat, add something to the PROS plan, she noted – because the PROS plan is part of the city’s master plan, which the planning commission must also approve.

The other amendment during the council’s meeting changed the definition of the site’s northern boundary, Briere said.

Kirk Westphal asked whether the council resolution designated that the park would be under city ownership. Briere replied that the city “has no choice. The city is not selling the top of the underground parking structure – that’s public land.” Rather, the city is forming a condominium arrangement and allowing someone to build, she said, in the same way that the city handled the Liberty Square (Tally Hall) parking structure and the City Apartments project at First and Washington, which includes public parking.

Bonnie Bona.

Bonnie Bona asked Briere to provide insight into any sense of urgency that exists regarding the Library Lane site. Bona noted that this council resolution had come up so quickly after the city had sold the former Y lot, which is located nearby. What’s the basis for moving so quickly?

Briere noted that people who have been advocating for a park on top of the Library Lane structure have been doing that for several years. Jack Eaton (Ward 4) worked with those advocates before he became a member of council, Briere said, and he worked with them to draft the resolution. But the city isn’t willing to commit to a public park today, she added, without also discussing how to pay for the design, maintenance, capital improvements and other things. There’s an expectation among many councilmembers, Briere said, as well as among people who advise those councilmembers, that the developer will design, construct and maintain the public park, thus providing the funding for it.

So to set aside the parkland without a funding stream means that the parkland would never get built upon, Briere said. That was the rationale behind going forward with the two resolutions. She noted that potential developers will have guidelines for what can be done on the site, and where, and the council will be able to determine which of the concepts work best, in consultation with the park advisory commission.

The question is “which comes first?” Briere said. Some people felt strongly that it made no sense for a park to be designated before there’s an opportunity to develop it. Others felt that deciding to sell to a developer made no sense. “It was an interesting discussion,” she said.

Ken Clein asked whether the portion of the site designated for a park would be rezoned. Briere responded that “it doesn’t need to be rezoned. It’s public land already. All parkland is public land.” Clein said he thought some portions weren’t zoned as public land. Briere then indicated that he was right – in fact, she said, the city had zoned that site as D1, the designation that allows the maximum density of development. So it would need to be rezoned, she said. Clein pointed out that a rezoning request would first need to be reviewed by the planning commission, before going to council.

Library Lane Site: Commission Discussion

When she introduced the planning commission resolution, Bonnie Bona noted that it’s meant to offer planning advice to the city council – and that’s the planning commission’s charge.

The Library Lane parking deck is highlighted in yellow. The name “Library Lane” is based only on the proximity of the structure to the downtown location of the Ann Arbor District Library. The library does not own the structure or the mid-block cut-through. (Base image from Washtenaw County and City of Ann Arbor GIS services.)

She said the second “whereas” clause was important, because it refers to the council’s direction to the planning commission to review downtown zoning. Citizens have raised concerns that are not yet incorporated into the downtown zoning, she noted.

Bona pointed out that since the city put its new downtown zoning in place in 2009, the Connecting William Street plan was completed, which included lots of public input, she said. [That project, conducted by the Ann Arbor Downtown Development Authority, looked at how the city might develop five city-owned downtown properties, including the Library Lane site.]

Other factors guiding this advice are the Midtown Character Area intent statement in the zoning ordinance, the downtown design guidelines, and the recommendations for downtown parks by the city’s park advisory commission. A lot of this isn’t yet reflected in the zoning, Bona said.

The city has only a few sites that it owns where it has the opportunity to provide some ongoing economic and aesthetic impact – beyond just the minimum requirements of the zoning code, Bona noted. So she and Diane Giannola took some of the information from these sources that aligned with what the planning commission has discussed in the past, and identified those elements as priorities.

The resolution is similar to the one that the planning commission passed regarding the former Y lot, Bona said. One major difference is the recommendation to seek an “iconic design” for the Library Lane site, because there are potentially four visible sides to a development and it is more centrally located.

Sabra Briere weighed in with what she called a “nitpick.” She commented on the use of the word “iconic” twice in the same bullet point: “To seek an iconic design for this site that is visible on all four sides and that creates an iconic addition to the skyline;…”

Ken Clein and Diane Giannola.

It’s overkill, Briere said, and she recommended that one of the instances be removed. “I felt that in drafting it, you became overly enthusiastic,” she told Bona and Giannola.

Giannola said it didn’t matter to her, but noted that the same wording was used in the Connecting William Street plan.

Bona said she’d struggled with the wording. The intent is to seek a design that is meant to be viewed from all four sides. One of the issues with buildings like Zaragon West is that two sides of the building were meant to never be exposed, she noted, because the expectation is that tall buildings will be constructed next to them in the future. So Bona preferred to remove the first mention of iconic, and revise the text to reflect the viewed-from-all-sides intent.

The bullet point was revised to state: “To seek a design for this site that is meant to be visible on all four sides and that creates an iconic addition to the skyline;…”

Jeremy Peters objected to the phrase “and public” in the following “whereas” clause:

WHEREAS the City Planning Commission requests that the City Council and public recognize the sale of “Library” Lot without an RFP may result in a development that 1) does not fulfill the overarching or site-level recommendations of the Connecting William Street Framework Plan, 2) does not meet the Intent statement for the Midtown Character Overlay Zoning District in the zoning ordinance, 3) ignores the recommendations of the Design Guidelines, and 4) ignores the recommendations of the Parks Advisory Commission (PAC) Downtown Parks Subcommittee Report;

Giannola replied that the same wording was used in the planning commission’s resolution regarding the Y lot. To her, the resolution was speaking both to the council and the public – because the public will weigh in on this, she said.

Briere’s problem with this whereas clause was that it’s an action statement, using the verb “requests.” So it shouldn’t be a “whereas” clause, she said.

Kirk Westphal recommended rephrasing the clause to make it more of a background statement: “WHEREAS the City Planning Commission recognizes the sale of ‘Library’ Lot …” Bona and Giannola accepted his suggestion as a friendly amendment.

Ken Clein said the phrase “cultural venue” gave him pause in one of the bulleted points of the final resolved clause:

A “mixed use” development with a density at around 700% FAR that takes advantage of the investment in footings and the mid-block location with active uses that have a high level of transparency fronting the plaza and at least 60% of Fifth Avenue and Library Lane frontages, while encouraging large floor plate office or lodging as a primary use, residential as a secondary use, and incorporating a cultural venue.

Bona noted that the bullet point reflected the Connecting William Street study. The idea was that it seemed like this location would provide a good opportunity to incorporate a cultural venue, she said. It wasn’t a directive to include a cultural venue, she added. Clein suggested adding the word “possibly” to the phrase – “and possibly incorporating a cultural venue” – which Bona and Giannola accepted as a friendly amendment.

Eleanore Adenekan asked what the term “generous landscaping” meant in one of the bullet points of the final resolved clause. Bona replied that “you pick a word that helps get the point across.” Bona didn’t think anyone wanted to put a percentage on the amount of landscaping a site should have. Bona was comfortable with the term “generous” because it conveyed the intent that landscaping should be noticeable, not just a couple of trees. If the resolution became too specific, Bona cautioned, “we could create unintended consequences.” Council can decide whether they want to be vague and use the power of suggestion, or if they want to be more specific, she said.

Jeremy Peters.

Wendy Woods wondered about the recommendation to use an RFP/RFQ process, pointing out that the council has already given direction to use a brokerage service – as the city did with the former Y lot. She noted that Briere had indicated the city was going to use a condominium arrangement on the site.

Wendy Rampson, the city’s planning manager, noted that the issue of a condominium arrangement was brought up at the council meeting because there seemed to be some misunderstanding about how the financial arrangement would work. She indicated that the planning commission resolution might not need that level of detail.

Westphal asked Rampson to comment on the difference between an RFP/RFQ process and what occurred at the former Y lot, when the city hired a broker to find a buyer. Rampson replied that with a broker, there would still be proposals that describe what the developer would do with the site. That would be available to the public at some point, she said. An RFP/RFQ process would “bake in” additional public process, she noted. Typically a committee is formed to review the proposals, and give recommendations about the proposal that would best meet the criteria of the RFP.

Briere said that the council felt the process of hiring a broker for the former Y lot had been very successful. It was easier and more straightforward, and resulted in a variety of different proposals, she noted. They’d seen that previous RFP attempts by the city had not been successful, she added, and that experience has influenced whether the council decides to do an RFP.

Giannola thought that the resolution passed by the planning commission about the Y lot had an indirect effect, because a lot of what the commissioners had wanted was incorporated into the proposals that the city received. So even though the council isn’t likely to issue an RFP, she thought it was important for potential developers and the community to know what the planning commission would want.

Bona added that it’s not yet clear what will happen on the former Y lot. “We don’t have a building,” she said. [The agreement between the city and local hotelier Dennis Dahlmann, who has offered $5.25 million for the lot, hasn't yet closed. The current closing date is April 2.] Her caution comes from the fact that the city has a downtown zoning ordinance that “doesn’t always get us what we want, because it’s words instead of a building,” Bona said.

She thought the power of suggestion might result in something that the community wants, in spite of not being a “protracted process.” Bona noted that an additional step in the RFP process is actually writing the RFP, which can take a lot of time. “So I’m not opposed to the process that the council is taking now,” she said.

Clein agreed with Briere that hiring a broker is more expedient, and he agreed with Bona that the ultimate test is whether the outcome is what the community wants. At the former Y lot, “the jury’s out on that until we see what happens,” he said.

Woods supported the resolution. She pointed to the wording of the final resolved clause: “RESOLVED that … an RFP contain some or all of the following conditions:…” Woods said the resolution makes a wonderful case for all of the conditions, so why say “some or all”? She proposed a revision to delete “some or” – adding that obviously the decision about the Library Lane site is up to the city council.

Giannola didn’t want the resolution to come across as “all or nothing.” Woods replied: “You know they’re bright enough to know that.” Giannola thought some people might think the commission was asking for too much, saying she’d be happy if most or even some of the suggestions were taken.

When Giannola said she thought it was overreaching to say “all,” Woods pointed out that it’s overreaching to even pass the resolution. She advocated against sounding “wishy-washy.” Westphal supported Woods, and at that point Giannola and Bona agreed to delete “some or” as a friendly amendment.

Westphal then called for a vote. All other commissioners voted, but Briere hesitated. Westphal called for another vote.

Outcome: Commissioners voted unanimously to approve the resolution, as amended, regarding the Library Lane lot.

After the vote, Briere said she hesitated because the council did not embrace the Connecting William Street report. Many councilmembers do not believe that the project was successful in public outreach, she said. Personally, Briere added, she believed that some of the advice in the planning commission’s resolution is excellent. However, she said, she’ll “take it worth a grain of salt as a member of council, because of the insistence on density as a result of having made the commitment to put footings in that could hold a dense building. Many members of council that I have spoken with do not believe that maximizing density, scale and mass of a building on that site is in the public interest.”

From left: Planning manager Wendy Rampson and Sabra Briere, who serves on both the planning commission and city council.

Briere said she was making these comments after the discussion and vote because she didn’t want other commissioners to feel that she was trying to tell the planning commission what to say or think. And despite Giannola’s belief that the planning commission’s recommendations were heeded on the Y lot, Briere wasn’t sure the recommendations were “knowingly heeded.”

Giannola noted that the council had approved the Library Lane parking structure with the additional footings, and at that time the majority of councilmembers did believe that a dense building should go on that site. There might be a change in viewpoint on council now, she added, but “we’re still going on what was in the plans back then.”

As for Connecting William Street, Giannola said it involved much public input. The majority of councilmembers at that time felt the same way, she added, and it’s the newer councilmembers who haven’t supported it. “To me, just because you have a different viewpoint and you’re a new councilmember, you can’t override everything that’s happened in the past,” she said. “History to me is important.”

Briere agreed that history is important, but noted that it’s not the past councilmembers who’ll be receiving the commission’s current resolution. People change on council, she noted, and that’s “sometimes in reaction to the very things that you’re citing.”

Briere noted that some of the documents mentioned in the commission’s resolution – the downtown plan, the design guidelines, the midtown character district – give strength to the resolution. They are documents that councilmembers can and should cite when they need to, she said.

The biggest thing that people should be talking about is what it means to have a strong frontage along South Fifth Avenue, Briere said. All of the documents cited in the commission’s resolution that refer specifically to the Library Lane site have recommended putting a public plaza along the South Fifth Avenue side. But a public plaza is not a strong frontage, she said. The structure was designed to hold at least very low or moderate intensity fronting South Fifth, she noted. “I don’t know how to reconcile those things,” Briere concluded.

Edwards Brothers Site

Planning commissioners also considered a resolution regarding the former Edwards Brothers Malloy property at 2500-2550 South State Street. The resolution recommended that the University of Michigan collaborate with the city of Ann Arbor regarding the future development of the site, immediately adjacent to existing UM athletic facilities. The university is purchasing the 16.7-acre property, following the Ann Arbor city council’s decision on Feb. 24, 2014 not to exercise its right of first refusal to buy the site.

The city council voted down a resolution that would have authorized Ann Arbor’s right of first refusal on the Edwards Brothers Malloy property, at a special session of the council on Feb. 24, 2014. That will allow the University of Michigan to purchase the property unimpeded.

In introducing the resolution, planning manager Wendy Rampson said she drafted the resolution based on previous discussions at planning commission and city council. The intent is for this resolution to be jointly passed by both entities, to be directed to the UM regents and president. [.pdf of draft resolution at start of March 18 meeting] [.pdf of resolution as amended at March 18 meeting]

Rampson said the city has struggled with this issue for many years, in terms of understanding the university’s need to expand its facilities weighed against the city’s interest in retaining its tax base. In the case of the Edwards Brothers site, there’s the added city desire to have redevelopment there provide a catalyst for other redevelopment in the South Street corridor, she said.

The hope is that representatives from both the city and UM will get together to talk about some of these issues, Rampson said. One question is whether there’s an opportunity for economic development along that section of the corridor. If UM would agree to “carve off” part of the site into smaller parcels fronting South State, she said, that might help to activate the corridor. Another issue is the existing park-and-ride lot, which will likely be displaced by UM’s expansion. Also of concern is the Oakbrook Drive extension that’s been planned for decades, she noted. What’s missing is a way to link from South State to South Main, through UM property.

The draft resolution at the start of the meeting had one resolved clause, which stated:

RESOLVED, That the Ann Arbor City Council and Ann Arbor City Planning Commission request that The University of Michigan Regents and the President Coleman authorize University staff to meet with City representatives to collaborate on issues related to future development of the South Athletic Campus area, including, but not limited to:

Exploring the creation of one or more parcels fronting South State Street to be sold for the purpose of developing complementary uses adjacent to the South Athletic Campus;

Discussing options for the relocation of park and ride facilities as the South Athletic Campus develops; and

Discussing the opportunities for a future pedestrian and vehicular connection between South Main Street and South State Street via the planned Oakbrook Drive extension through the South Athletic Campus site.

No one spoke during a public hearing on this item.

Edwards Brothers Site: Commission Discussion

Sabra Briere began the discussion by asking whether it makes sense for the resolution to address UM president Mary Sue Coleman, given that Coleman is retiring this summer. Briere suggested addressing it instead to the new president, Mark Schlissel. Jeremy Peters recommended taking out reference to any specific name, and simply address it to the regents and president.

Kirk Westphal.

Ken Clein said he could imagine that the regents and president wouldn’t want the city to suggest how they should dispose of their property. Instead of stating that the parcels fronting South State should be sold, Clein suggested recommending how those parcel should be developed. Whether those parcels are sold or leased would be a matter for the university to decide, he said.

Peters thought the reference to selling the land was intentional, because it would add to the city’s tax base if the land were in private ownership. Clein thought the resolution might get a better reception from UM if the city didn’t try to stipulate how the university should deal with the property.

Bonnie Bona thought there’d be a taxable value to having development, even if the property remained in UM ownership. That’s because it would help motivate other development on private property elsewhere in the corridor, she noted.

Paras Parekh asked about the phrase “complementary uses.” Does that refer to uses that complement the South State corridor, or that complement activities on the UM campus? Westphal interpreted it as complementing land uses that the city would like to see in that corridor.

Rampson said both interpretations are appropriate. She’d intended it to refer to uses that would complement UM’s athletic campus, but it could also relate to the corridor too, she said.

Peters advocated for leaving in a reference to the front parcels possibly being sold. It’s been brought up frequently in community discussions, he noted. Briere pointed out that a reference to selling the land is in the fifth “whereas” clause:

WHEREAS, City Council, the Planning Commission, and concerned city residents have indicated a desire for community benefit to be incorporated into The University of Michigan’s plans for development of the Edwards Brothers site, including the possibility for frontage parcels to be created and sold for private development; …

Wendy Woods said her sense is that this resolution is intended to get some kind of a conversation started, based on the city’s goals for that area. In that regard, the resolution shouldn’t be a non-starter, she said.

Further wordsmithing resulted in this revised bullet point:

Exploring the creation of one or more parcels fronting South State Street to be developed, preferably privately, for complementary uses adjacent to the South Athletic Campus that also follow the South State Street plan recommendations;

Westphal said he expected the city council would want to make changes to the resolution. If they do, would it come back to the planning commission, given that it’s a joint resolution? Rampson indicated that bringing it back to the commission would take more time. She suggested communicating that the commission wouldn’t object to changes that the council might make.

Briere noted that the next meeting of the planning commission, on April 1, falls before the next meeting of the council, which is on April 7. So it would be possible to take another look at this resolution, she said.

There was no particular interest among commissioners in postponing the resolution. Rampson said she’s already shared a draft of resolution with UM planner Sue Gott and Jim Kosteva, the university’s director of community relations.

The resolved clause, as amended, stated:

RESOLVED, That the Ann Arbor City Council and Ann Arbor City Planning Commission request that The Regents of The University of Michigan and President authorize University staff to meet with City representatives to collaborate on issues related to future development of the South Athletic Campus area, including, but not limited to:

Exploring the creation of one or more parcels fronting South State Street to be developed, preferably privately, for complementary uses adjacent to the South Athletic Campus that also follow the South State Street plan recommendations;

Discussing options for the relocation of park-and-ride facilities as the South Athletic Campus develops; and

Discussing the opportunities for a future pedestrian and vehicular connection between Ross Main Street and South State Street via the planned Oakbrook Drive extension through the Ross Athletic Campus site.

Outcome: Commissioners unanimously passed the resolution as amended. The resolution will be forwarded to the city council, with the understanding that changes made to the resolution by the council will be supported by the planning commission without further review.

Shell Station Site Plan

The site plan for an overhaul to the Shell station and a new drive-thru restaurant at 2991 S. State was on the March 18 agenda. The site is located at the northeast corner of the East Eisenhower Parkway and South State Street.

Aerial view of the site for a Shell station and drive-thru restaurant at the northeast corner of South State and East Eisenhower.

The plan calls for demolishing the current one-story convenience store and car wash on this site, which total 2,435 square feet. In its place, the owner – Joseph Kafi of JAK Cubed LLC – would put up a single building with a 1,250-square-foot drive-thru restaurant and 3,000-square-foot convenience store. The existing gas pump island canopy will remain in place, and two pumps will be relocated to spots under the canopy.

According to a staff memo, a single lane drive-thru would be primarily accessed from the existing East Eisenhower Parkway curb cut. Vehicles would move in an east-to-north direction before exiting onto either South State or looping back south to East Eisenhower. The drive-thru lane provides stacking for up to nine vehicles and would be screened to the west by the proposed new building. A total of 22 parking spaces are proposed for the site, including eight that are located at the four gas pump islands.

A new sidewalk connection with a striped crosswalk would connect the southern building entrance to the public sidewalk along Eisenhower.

Approval was needed to modify landscaping requirements in Chapter 62 of the city code – the landscape and screening ordinance. A minimum 10-foot right-of-way buffer is required. The owner is asking that the width of the buffer be reduced to the existing 4-foot wide right-of-way landscape buffer fronting South State Street, which contains a 30-inch-high screening wall and landscaping. That would allow for continued use of the two gas pump islands on the western portion of this site. Other landscaping would be added along South State Street and East Eisenhower Parkway to screen the vehicular use area. The site is zoned C3 (fringe commercial).

The project, located in Ward 4, is estimated to cost $800,000. The business is expected to remain open during construction. The existing convenience store will then be demolished after the new building is finished. The specific restaurant to be located there is still being negotiated, according to the owner.

Planning staff recommended approval of the plan. [.pdf of staff report]

Shell Station Site Plan: Public Hearing

Brad Cousino of Terratek Design Inc., the project’s engineer, began by noting that his older brother, Ken Cousino, had spoken to commissioners earlier in the meeting about a different project – the Collingwood office building site plan (see below). Cousino said he and the owners were on hand to answer any questions.

Shell Station Site Plan: Commission Discussion – Traffic, Parking

Eleanore Adenekan wondered if traffic would be congested coming in from the Eisenhower side. City planner Chris Cheng replied that the owner had submitted a traffic study. The city’s traffic engineer had commented that the site will capture drive-by traffic – that is, traffic that is already in the area. So the project isn’t expected to increase traffic significantly, he said. Within the site, there will be space for nine vehicles to queue up in the drive-thru lane.

From left: Joseph Kafi and Brad Cousino.

Sabra Briere wondered how the drive-thru would be accessible from State Street. Cheng noted that vehicles coming in from State Street would need to loop around the site. Briere observed that it seems vehicles from State would be routed across incoming traffic from Eisenhower.

Wendy Woods noted that 8 of the site’s 22 spaces are located at the gas pumps. She wondered if those gas pump spaces would be tied up when someone wanted to buy gas and eat in the restaurant and there were no other parking spaces available. Brad Cousino said that technically, the spots at the gas pumps do qualify as parking spaces. But he wouldn’t expect people to park there while getting food from the drive-thru.

Jeremy Peters asked about the pedestrian crosswalk that goes across South State Street, near the southern entrance into the Shell site. He noted that South State is a road with higher speeds. In discussions about traffic and pedestrian access, Peters said, was there any talk about that crosswalk and traffic flow? Cousino said he didn’t see that as a high-speed area, because vehicles would be slowing down at the intersection of State and Eisenhower.

Diane Giannola said she uses this gas station frequently, because it’s in her neighborhood. She suggested that the walkway should be well-marked to indicate that it’s a pedestrian crossing, so that cars entering from Eisenhower can see it. Cousino said they could put some kind of pedestrian crossing sign there.

Ken Clein noted that the parking along the proposed building gives him pause. Vehicles would be backing out into an area where other cars would be pulling into the pumps.

Bonnie Bona pointed out that there’s a six-foot space between the building and the parking spots, but that includes a two-foot overhang from vehicles – so there would only be four feet between a vehicle’s bumper and the building. She asked planning staff to verify that there’s enough space for the walkway. She assumed that the business wouldn’t be putting items like propane tanks on the walkway. The area looks really tight, she said.

Following up on Bona’s comments, Clein suggested that the project team look at the location of the entry doors to the convenience store, to make sure they are accessible from the parking area. He didn’t think it would meet ADA requirements, but noted that it’s not in the planning commission’s purview. Cousino described the plans as not yet finalized, so the issue that Clein raised would be addressed.

Bona asked how the 22-space parking minimum had been calculated. Cheng replied that it’s calculated by taking a combination of the requirements for the restaurant and for the convenience store. Bona said she supports less parking in general, so she’s not concerned about counting the eight spaces at the pumps. In the past, the planning commission has even discussed counting the stacked spaces in the drive-thru queue, she said.

Shell Station Site Plan: Commission Discussion – Canopy, Dumpsters

Sabra Briere noted that the canopy over the gas pumps, a chevron shape, is clearly designed for three sets of pumps, but there will only be two sets. Briere said she was curious about that. Chris Cheng noted that the entire canopy covers the pumps and the walkway to the convenience store.

Ken Clein clarified with Cheng that the dumpster enclosure on the site plan is proposed, but doesn’t currently exist. Jeremy Peters wondered if the enclosure would have room for a grease dumpster, in addition to trash and recycling. Brad Cousino said that the 20-foot-wide enclosure is generous, so there might be room for a grease container.

Shell Station Site Plan: Commission Discussion – Landscaping

Regarding the landscape buffer, Bonnie Bona said she’s very supportive of maintaining the existing plants, adding that she knows how difficult it is for plants to survive in those kinds of locations. She wondered if the trees there are growing. The owner, Joseph Kafi, replied that in the six years he’s had the site, the trees appear to be growing. He’s also planted a crabapple tree and shrubs, which are doing well, he said.

Shell Station Site Plan: Commission Discussion – Drive-Thru

Wendy Woods asked what kind of drive-thru restaurant would be located there. Brad Cousino said they’re negotiating with several different chains, but it hasn’t been decided.

Wendy Woods.

Jeremy Peters wondered where signs for the restaurant would be located. Cousino replied that he wasn’t sure what the sign ordinance would require, but the signs would be visible. Peters hoped that the signs for the Shell station and the restaurant would be put on the same signpost.

Sabra Briere asked if the proposal complies with the proposed changes to the city’s zoning ordinance regarding drive-thrus. Wendy Rampson noted that the proposed changes would limit the drive-thru lane in a site’s front open space, to make sure it’s well-screened. She said this project wouldn’t be affected by the proposed amendments to the ordinance. [.pdf of proposed ordinance amendments, to be considered by the commission on April 1.]

Kirk Westphal wondered whether this kind of project would require special exception use approval, if proposed amendments to the ordinance are passed. Yes, Cheng replied, but currently drive-thru uses are permitted in C3 zoning.

Westphal asked Cheng to comment on why drive-thrus are currently allowed in this zoning district. Cheng replied that the city’s master plan does recommend commercial uses for this particular corner, with pedestrian amenities. The site plan includes a pedestrian connection from Eisenhower and six bike hoops. Rampson noted that C3 is the only zoning district that now allows drive-thrus without requiring a special exception use permit. She reported that the commission’s ordinance revisions committee is interested in putting more restrictions on this type of use because it’s not in alignment with the city’s master plan objectives.

The planning commission’s April 1 agenda includes proposed revisions to the zoning ordinance related to drive-thrus. The amendments would add a definition of a “drive-thru facility” to the ordinance. Drive-thrus would need special exception use permits, which would be allowed in the O (office), C2B (business service) and C3 (fringe commercial) zoning districts. Basic layout requirements would also be added to the ordinance.

Currently, drive-thrus are allowed in C3 districts without a special exception use permit. They are allowed as special exception uses in the C2B district.

Wendy Woods said that given the site’s location near an expressway – the I-94 exchange is located just south of this intersection – she thought the drive-thru would make sense.

Outcome: Commissioners recommended approval of the site plan and landscape modifications for the Shell station project.

Collingwood Site Plan

A proposal to expand an office building at 278-280 Collingwood was reviewed by planning commissioners on March 18.

Aerial view indicating location of 278-280 Collingwood Drive.

The site plan calls for removing the existing second floor on the east side of the office building and constructing a 2,451-square-foot second floor over the entire building for office use. A new staircase will be added at the southwest corner of the building. The second floor will overhang the first floor along the front of the building and along part of the north side.

An existing curbcut on the north side of the property will be removed. The current 22 parking spaces on the site will be reduced to 17.

Planning commissioners were also asked to approve modifications to the city’s landscaping requirements for this site. Some of the required interior landscaping – the right-of-way screening and interior landscaping island – would be in the critical root zone of two landmark trees, so the owner requested permission to move the landscaping to other parts of the site. That change is supported by the city’s urban forester.

Total construction cost for this project is estimated at $300,000. The office building is located in Ward 4. Collingwood Drive is a street off of West Stadium Boulevard, just south of West Stadium’s convergence with South Maple Road. [.pdf of staff memo]

Planning staff had recommended approval of the site plan.

Collingwood Site Plan: Public Hearing

Ken Cousino spoke during the public hearing, and noted that the project’s two owners were attending the meeting as well to answer questions.

Ken Cousino.

Collingwood Site Plan: Commission Discussion

Jeremy Peters asked for clarification about the curbcut off of Collingwood. City planner Chris Cheng explained that after the staff report was written, it was determined that there was no need to actually increase the width of the curbcut to meet the current code. The curbcut had been installed in 1978, so it would be considered an existing, non-conforming curbcut and wouldn’t be changed.

Wendy Rampson, the city’s planning manager, noted that the entire area had originally been zoned for parking. It had been intended as a buffer between the commercial corridor of West Stadium Boulevard and the office district to the east. The area was rezoned from parking to office in 1965.

Peters supported removing one of the curbcuts, saying it made things easier for pedestrians. He also supported landscaping modifications so that the landmark trees would be preserved.

Bonnie Bona clarified with Cheng that the pavement currently in place for the north curbcut would be replaced with turf and landscaping.

Bona also asked if the building would require an elevator. Ken Cousino responded that it did not. Bona noted that the project is only taking about half of the allowable floor-area ratio (FAR). She said she always likes to know why a project doesn’t take full advantage of the density that’s allowed. Cousino replied that an additional floor would require that an elevator be installed.

Outcome: Commissioners unanimously recommended approval of the site plan and modifications to the city’s landscaping requirements. It will be forwarded to the city council for consideration.

Belle Tire Easement

The March 18 agenda included an easement related to a new Belle Tire at 590 W. Ellsworth.

The commission had recommended site plan approval at its Aug. 20, 2013 meeting, and the project subsequently received city council approval on Oct. 7, 2013. The site is located in Ward 4.

Aerial view of a proposed Belle Tire site.

A 50-foot-wide right-of-way easement on the front of this site was recorded by the city as part of a previously approved land division for this parcel. That easement reduced the front setback of the Belle Tire building from 10 feet to roughly 3 feet. The minimum front setback for this site, which is zoned C3 (fringe commercial), is 10 feet.

So the property owner, who also owns the adjacent site at 3975 S. State, has proposed that the city vacate the northern 7 feet of its right-of-way easement. In exchange, the property owner has offered to convey a non-motorized use easement over the same 7 feet.

Such an easement would allow for this strip to be used by the public for future non-motorized transportation facilities, according to a staff memo. And as a non-motorized use easement, the 7-foot strip would be considered part of the required 10-foot front building setback.

The planning staff recommended approval of this proposal. No one spoke during the public hearing.

Belle Tire Easement: Commission Discussion

Ken Clein asked whether the intent is to have a future pedestrian pathway on the easement. Planner Chris Cheng, who gave the staff presentation, said there are no current plans other than the sidewalk that will be installed as part of the site plan. But if in the future there are road improvements on Ellsworth and the sidewalk must be removed, then a sidewalk or other non-motorized use could be located in the easement.

In response to another query from Clein, Cheng noted that the site plan addresses a grade change along that edge of the property by including a walkway and some steps.

Outcome: Commissioners unanimously recommended approval of this proposal. It will be forwarded to the city council for consideration.

Communications & Commentary

Every meeting includes several opportunities for communications from planning staff and commissioners, as well as two opportunities for public commentary. No one spoke during public commentary on March 18.

Communications & Commentary: Planning Commission Bylaws

Planning manager Wendy Rampson noted that the city council had approved some revisions to the planning commission’s bylaws – but not all of the revisions that have been recommended by planning commissioners were brought forward. The council approved the revisions that planning commissioners had passed about six months ago – at its July 16, 2013 meeting.

The changes relate to the order of agenda items, and the length of time required for special accommodations. The bylaws, as revised, call for additional lead time so that special accommodations, including a sign language interpreter, can be made for people with disabilities, when requested at least two business days in advance of a meeting. The previous bylaws specified just a one-day advance request.

Revisions that were approved by planning commissioners more recently – at their Feb. 20, 2014 meeting – have not yet been forwarded to the council. Rampson reported that assistant city attorney Kevin McDonald wanted to have some additional discussion about those revisions related to public hearings.

Wendy Woods wondered whether the city attorney’s office would work quickly, “so that we aren’t waiting a long time.” Rampson replied that she asked McDonald to draft language that he would find acceptable, and that could be forwarded to the commissioners for consideration. She said she’d communicate with him that commissioners would like to see that as quickly as possible.

One revision clarifies the limitations on a city councilmember’s interaction with the commission. The revised section states: “A member of the City Council shall not be heard before the Commission during the Councilmember’s term in office.” The intent is to prevent undue influence on the commission, and to avoid the possibility of legal action against the city.

Other revisions affect speaking turns at public hearings. The intent is to clarify how many turns the same person can speak at a public hearing, and how public hearings are continued if an item is postponed.

Present: Eleanore Adenekan, Bonnie Bona, Sabra Briere, Ken Clein, Diane Giannola, Jeremy Peters, Paras Parekh, Kirk Westphal, Wendy Woods. Also: City planning manager Wendy Rampson.

Next meeting: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 at 7 p.m. in the second floor council chambers at city hall, 301 E. Huron St., Ann Arbor. [Check Chronicle event listings to confirm date]

The Chronicle survives in part through regular voluntary subscriptions to support our coverage of publicly-funded entities like the city’s planning commission. If you’re already supporting The Chronicle, please encourage your friends, neighbors and coworkers to do the same. Click this link for details: Subscribe to The Chronicle.

Shell Station Project on S. State Moves Ahead

Chronicle Staff — Wed, 19 Mar 2014 01:53:16 +0000

An overhaul of a Shell station and a new drive-thru restaurant at 2991 S. State will be moving head, following action at the March 18, 2014 meeting of the Ann Arbor planning commission. The site is located at the northeast corner of the East Eisenhower Parkway and South State Street.

Aerial view of the site for a Shell station and drive-thru restaurant at the northeast corner of South State and East Eisenhower.

Commissioners recommended approval of a site plan and modifications to the city’s landscaping requirements. The plan calls for demolishing the current one-story convenience store and car wash on this site, which total 2,435 square feet. In its place, the owner – Joseph Kafi of JAK Cubed LLC – would put up a single building with a 1,250-square-foot drive-thru restaurant and 3,000-square-foot convenience store. The existing gas pump island canopy will remain in place, and two pumps will be relocated to spots under the canopy.

According to a staff memo, a single lane drive-thru would be primarily accessed from the existing East Eisenhower Parkway curb cut. Vehicles would move in an east-to-north direction before exiting onto either South State or East Eisenhower. The drive-thru lane provides stacking for up to nine vehicles and would be screened to the west by the proposed new building. A total of 22 parking spaces are proposed for the site, including eight that are located at the four gas pump islands.

Approval is needed to modify landscaping requirements in Chapter 62 of the city code – the landscape and screening ordinance. A minimum 10-foot right-of-way buffer is required. The owner is asking that the width of the buffer be reduced to the existing 4-foot wide right-of-way landscape buffer fronting South State Street, which contains a 30-inch-high screening wall and landscaping. That would allow for continued use of the two gas pump islands on the western portion of this site. Other landscaping would be added along South State Street and East Eisenhower Parkway to screen the vehicular use area.

Planning staff recommended approval of the plan. [.pdf of staff report]

This brief was filed from the second-floor council chambers at city hall, 301 E. Huron. A more detailed report will follow: [link]

Site Plan for Tim Hortons Moves to Council

Chronicle Staff — Wed, 17 Jul 2013 02:53:29 +0000

A revised PUD (planned unit development) zoning and site plan for the Shell station and Tim Hortons at the northeast corner of Ann Arbor-Saline Road and Eisenhower Parkway received a recommendation of approval from Ann Arbor planning commissioners on July 16, 2013. The recommendation will next be considered by the city council.

Proposed changes to the supplemental regulations for this 1.44-acre site would allow for a drive-thru restaurant within the existing convenience store, where a Tim Hortons is already located. The project includes constructing a 109-square-foot drive-thru window addition and access driveway on the north side of the building. Access to the drive-thru lane would be off of the site’s existing entrance from Ann Arbor-Saline Road. The property is located in Ward 4.

A PUD had previously been approved by the council at its July 2, 2012 meeting, but without plans for a drive-thru restaurant.

If approved by the council, the drive-thru lane would be screened by a 30-inch high hedgerow, berm and landscaping, according to a staff memo. The plan also calls for installing a brick-paved pedestrian path from the Ann Arbor-Saline Road public sidewalk to the north entrance of the building. A paved patio area would be located in the center of the drive-thru loop for outside dining.

As a “public amenity,” the owner proposes putting in a 140-square-foot brick-paved area at the site’s southwest corner – near the intersection of Eisenhower and Ann Arbor-Saline Road – with two park benches and shrubbery. Some commissioners questioned whether anyone would use that spot, given its location next to heavy traffic. Wendy Woods, saying she had family nearby, indicated that there is a fair amount of pedestrian and bike traffic in that area.

The plan also entails building a new sidewalk “stub” from the south of the building, which could possibly be used in the future to connect to the Cranbrook Village Shopping Center located to the east of the site. However, planning staff noted that a sidewalk between those two parcels might not be viable, given the significant grade change. Nor have the owners of the shopping center given permission for such a connection.

This brief was filed from the second floor council chambers at city hall, 301 E. Huron. A more detailed report will follow.

Sustainability Permeates Council Meeting

Dave Askins — Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:24:35 +0000

Ann Arbor city council meeting (July 2, 2012): The council’s agenda was relatively light, consisting of several apparently unrelated items. But for some agenda items, “sustainability” was a common theme.

Eunice Burns, former Ann Arbor city councilmember and Downtown Development Authority board member, introduces herself to city administrator Steve Powers before the July 2 council meeting started. Burns was on hand to receive a proclamation for Huron River Day, which falls on July 15 this year. Burns, along with Shirley Axon, is co-founder of the event. (Photos by the writer.)

Most obviously fitting that theme was a resolution passed by the council directing the city’s planning commission to incorporate 16 sustainability goals into the city’s master plan. The 16 goals, which were compiled from existing planning documents, had worked their way through a community engagement process and were adopted by several city commissions before arriving before the city council. The goals fall into four categories: climate and energy; community; land use and access; and resource management.

Clearly related to land use and access (the goal of “preserve our natural systems”), as well as resource management (“eliminate pollutants in our air and water systems”) was a resolution directing city staff to develop a “green streets” policy. The policy would formalize an approach to stormwater management that would allow city street projects to incorporate various technologies to mimic natural processes, to reduce the amount of stormwater runoff that goes directly into the city’s stormwater pipes and on into the Huron River. Features like bioswales, for example, would filter stormwater through natural systems so that pollutants from street surfaces would not flow directly to the river.

The river itself was part of the meeting’s sustainability theme as it was highlighted with a mayoral proclamation in honor of Huron River Day, which falls on July 15 this year.

Among the specific sustainability goals in the category of “community” is one that addresses economic sustainability: “Develop a prosperous, resilient local economy that provides opportunity by … rewarding investment in our community …” In that spirit, the council took the first step toward awarding a tax abatement to Barracuda Networks, a company that recently announced it’s moving from its Depot Street location into downtown Ann Arbor as part of a planned expansion of its workforce.

Another agenda item could be analyzed as part of the “integrated land use” and “economic vitality” sustainability goals: final approval of a rezoning request for the Shell station on the northeast corner of Ann Arbor-Saline and West Eisenhower Parkway.

Fitting into the “community” sustainability category was a resolution that made Ann Arbor a member of the Washtenaw Health Initiative (WHI) by authorizing a $10,000 annual membership fee. The goal of the WHI is to help local health care providers handle an influx of an estimated 50,000 newly insured patients when federal health care reforms take effect in 2014. The specific sustainability goal is to “provide services that meet basic human needs of impoverished and disenfranchised residents to maximize the health and well-being of the community.”

The council also approved appointments to three city commissions that are connected thematically to the sustainability goals – environmental, greenbelt advisory, and planning.

Making the city of Ann Arbor more financially sustainable is not an explicit part of the sustainability goals adopted by the city council. Yet financial sustainability could be seen as an outcome of the council’s ratification of three different union contracts. All three contracts increase the retirement benefit vesting period for new hires from five to 10 years, and increase the period for the final average compensation calculation to five years from three. The three labor groups that had their contracts ratified were the police professional assistants, civilian supervisors, and the deputy police chiefs.

Some of the public commentary also featured a sustainability theme – as former Allied Bendix engineer Kermit Schlansker outlined the energy efficiency benefits of cisterns. Also weighing in during public commentary were opponents of the new “smart meters” that are being installed by DTE Energy in Ann Arbor and other Michigan communities.

In other business, the council approved a weapons screening contract with the Washtenaw County sheriff’s office – for the 15th District Court, located inside the new justice center along with the Ann Arbor police department.

During communications time, city attorney Stephen Postema updated the council on legal action related to the Dream Nite Club, which had its liquor license revoked earlier this year. He said four significant court rulings on lawsuits filed by the club’s owners against the city had gone the city’s way.

The council’s communications also included mention of two ballot questions that voters might have to decide in November. One is a renewal of the park maintenance and capital improvements millage. The council is almost certain to place that millage renewal on the Nov. 6 ballot. Another question is less certain – one that would change the city charter to require a voter referendum, if the city were to lease parkland. The charter already prohibits the sale of parkland without a referendum.

Sustainability Goals: Master Plan

The council considered a resolution directing the city planning commission to start a process of incorporating 16 sustainability goals into the city’s master plan. While that master plan review process is underway, the council’s resolution directs the city administrator to apply the 16 goals in staff work. [.pdf of 16 sustainability goals]

The sustainability goals are divided into four categories: resource management; land use and access; climate and energy; and community. By way of illustration, from the land use and access category, one of the goals is: “Establish a physical and cultural environment that supports and encourages safe, comfortable and efficient ways for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users to travel throughout the city and region.”

The goals were culled from more than 200 goals that are already found in existing city planning documents, as part of a project that began in early 2011. The work has been funded by a Home Depot Foundation grant.

Development of the work by city staff was initially guided by volunteers who serve on four city advisory commissions: park, planning, energy and environmental. Members from those groups met at a joint working session in late September of 2011. Since then, the city’s housing commission and housing & human services commission have been added to the conversation. A series of panel discussions on each category was held earlier this year, as was a public forum to solicit input.

The city planning commission voted on June 5, 2012 to recommend to the city council that it pass the resolution considered by the council on July 2.

Additional background on the Ann Arbor sustainability initiative is on the city’s website. See also Chronicle coverage: “Building a Sustainable Ann Arbor,” “Sustaining Ann Arbor’s Environmental Quality,” “Land Use, Transit Factor Into Sustainability,” and “Final Forum: What Sustains Community?”

Sustainability Goals: Public Commentary

Alan Haber told the council that in some circles he’s considered a pest. But he perseveres, he said. He supports the sustainability goals and he thinks they’re an important step. He related the notion of sustainability to the efforts of homeless people to organize their own community along the lines of Camp Take Notice. He then pointed to the city-owned building at 721 N. Main and contended that if the city made it available, that would help a community form, and that would be a part of the realization of sustainability goals.

Haber also contended that sustainability requires space for a community on top of the new underground parking structure on South Fifth Avenue. That space can change and create its own story, he said. When he attended a recent meeting of the Connecting William Street committee, which is working to develop possible scenarios for alternate uses of city-owned surface lots, all of the scenarios involved developing the top of the parking structure in some way. None of the scenarios allowed for open space there. The committee had not heard a word of the input that had been provided, he contended – because people all over town said they wanted an open space. That’s what the community wants, he said.

Kermit Schlansker.

Kermit Schlansker, a former engineer with Allied Bendix, told the council that the problem with wind and solar power is that it’s intermittent. A way to store the energy is needed, he said. He suggested that cisterns could be part of the solution. In the summer, he said, cistern water can cool buildings. In the winter, the use of a heat pump on cistern water – at 55 F degrees – would be relatively efficient, he said. Forget about rain gardens and rain barrels, he said, because they don’t store energy.

The big problem with cisterns, Schlansker said, is how to build them. The work of digging them has to be done by hand, but that would make jobs for poor people. He compared cistern digging to coal mining. The best way to store carbon is to leave it in the ground, he said. Like apartment houses, cisterns are one of the few energy devices that can last 1,000 years.

Sustainability Goals: Council Deliberations

At the July 2 meeting, Tony Derezinski (Ward 2) asked city planning manager Wendy Rampson to come to the podium. Rampson introduced Jamie Kidwell, sustainability associate with the city. Kidwell had done most of the work, along with some interns, Rampson said. City environmental coordinator Matt Naud and Rampson had assisted Kidwell, Rampson said. Kidwell ventured that many councilmembers had seen the sustainability goals through commissions and boards they sit on.

Derezinski asked Kidwell to give a succinct definition of sustainability. By way of responding to Derezinski, Kidwell noted that an effort had been made to build the vision of sustainability from existing planning documents. It’s from those documents that the four “chapters” were distilled: resource management; land use and access; climate and energy; and community. They build on the city of Ann Arbor’s 10 environmental goals that were adopted in 2007, she said.

Carsten Hohnke (Ward 5) asked Kidwell to talk about how we’ll know if the city is making progress. In responding, Kidwell alluded to the city’s State of Our Environment Report. She indicated that for sustainability, more detailed indicators would be developed along the lines of the environmental indicators. Those indicators will be tied to targets, she said, and she ventured that those indicators would be reviewed on a biennial basis.

Outcome: The council unanimously approved the resolution directing the planning commission to integrate the 16 sustainability goals into the city’s master plan.

Green Streets Policy

The council considered a resolution that directs city staff from a range of different departments to work with the environmental commission to develop a “green streets” policy.

The policy would formalize an approach to stormwater management that would allow street projects to incorporate an “array of products, technologies, and practices that use natural systems – or engineered systems that mimic natural processes – to enhance overall environmental quality and provide utility services …” The goals of developing and implementing the policy include a reduction in the amount of untreated stormwater flowing from streets directly to the city’s stormwater system and into the Huron River. By implementing systems like bioswales, for example, a portion of the stormwater runoff from streets, which includes contaminants from the road surface, would be filtered naturally before entering the river.

To emphasize the impact that the city’s streets have on stormwater runoff, a staff memo accompanying the resolution indicates that Ann Arbor’s 27 square miles includes 11.2 square miles of impervious surface, of which about one quarter (2.9 square miles) is the city right-of-way. City staff estimate that half of the runoff in the city’s stormwater system comes directly from the city right-of-way.

At the council’s meeting on June 18, 2012, city environmental commissioner Valerie Strassberg had addressed councilmembers, asking for their support in bringing the resolution forward. At that meeting, Sabra Briere (Ward 1) indicated she’d be bringing the resolution forward at the July 2 meeting. It was co-sponsored by Carsten Hohnke (Ward 5). Hohnke and Briere are the two city council appointees to the environmental commission.

The city staff who are directed to take part in the development of the green streets policy are in the systems planning, project management, field operations, parks and recreation, and planning departments.

The resolution was introduced by Briere. She noted that the city staff have already worked hard to implement various green streets approaches. However, the city has no policy about how to implement those approaches or what level of priority to assign them. She stressed that the green streets policy that will be developed by the environmental commission under the direction of the council’s resolution would come back to the council for its review. The council would then decide if the policy has been properly developed.

Hohnke characterized it as a move to provide formal guidance. City staff have been involved in the green streets techniques. And this approach has always been a growing part of how the city has thought about managing its streets, he said. Stormwater has an impact on infrastructure and the quality of our water, he continued. The city should bring new technologies to bear on this problem. Those technologies include pervious pavement and a “whole suite of actions that improve stormwater runoff.”

Jane Lumm (Ward 2) stated that she does support the resolution. She offered her thanks in advance to the staff and the environmental commission for the work they’d be doing. However, she wanted to add that when the green streets policy comes back to the council for review, she hopes to see supporting data that clearly articulates costs and benefits, including benchmark data with other cities. She noted that the council had recent approved a pervious pavement project, and it wasn’t clear what the capital and operational differentials were. She understood that a policy doesn’t mean something is set in stone. But she wanted a solid sense of the costs that are contemplated by the green streets policy.

Outcome: The council voted unanimously to direct the development of a green streets policy.

Huron River

The Huron River was featured twice during the meeting – in connection with a proclamation about Huron River Day, and during public commentary about park rules against swimming in the river.

Misty Lyn and the Big Beautiful from their Sonic Lunch performance during the summer of 2011. From left: Ryan Gimpert, Misty Lyn, Matt Jones, Carol Gray, Jim Roll.

Huron River: Huron River Day

The proclamation in honor of Huron River Day is an annual one. This year the celebration falls on July 15. Co-founders of the event – Eunice Burns and Shirley Axon – were on hand to receive the proclamation.

Burns put in a plug for one of the bands that’s playing this year: Misty Lyn and the Big Beautiful. She noted that her granddaughter, Carol Gray, plays in the band.

In her brief remarks to councilmembers, Burns told them that some new events are included this year, among them a triathlon. The three legs of the event require bicycling from Argo to Gallup, running a circuit on land around Argo Pond and then kayaking back down to Gallup. [Swimming is not a part of the triathlon.]

Huron River: Swimming

David Collins introduced himself as an avid canoeist and occasional swimmer. He told the council he wanted to address some signs he’d seen posted at the Argo Cascades [a new bypass around Argo Dam that includes a series of drop pools]. The posted signs indicate that no swimming is allowed pursuant to Chapter 39 of the city code, which Collins described as apparently prohibiting swimming from city-owned land adjacent to waterways, except for those areas that are designated for it.

By way of background, Chapter 39 reads in relevant part:

3:2. – Restrictions.
While in a park, no person shall:
…
(16) swim, dive or play golf or hockey except in areas specifically designated for such purpose.

The idea of swimming in the Argo Cascades had been discussed at the park advisory commission meeting on May 15, 2012, when commissioners ventured that it might be a way to deal with the heat. From The Chronicle’s coverage:

David Barrett ask about the possibility of people swimming in the pools of the cascades – especially as the weather gets warmer. Colin Smith [the city's parks and recreation manager] noted that there’s a park rule against swimming in the river using parkland as a bank. And given the level of boating activity in the cascades, he said, if the intent was to go for a relaxing dip, it wouldn’t be all that relaxing.

During his remarks to the council on July 2, however, Collins contended that the park rule was unenforceable. He appreciated the city’s interest in promoting safety and in protecting itself from liability. But the city, he contended, does not have the authority to enact an ordinance like Chapter 39 that restricts use of the river. He cited the public trust doctrine that governs riparian rights and referred to a state of Michigan publication – ”Public Rights on Michigan Waters“:

It is quite clear that although a riparian owns the fee to the bed of a navigable (public) stream, his ownership is subordinate to the right of the public to the free and unobstructed use of the stream for navigation, fishing, swimming and other uses inherently belonging to the public.

Collins noted that if the city “invites guests,” it might have additional responsibility. For open and obvious dangers, he said, the city did not have liability. Only when the risks are hidden dangers are there real issues, he said.

Rather than post warnings about violations of an abstract, unenforceable piece of the city’s code, Collins suggested that the signs should provide warnings about real danger – like sharp, hidden rocks. That kind of sign could be more effective to prevent people from trying to use the Argo Cascades chutes as a water slide.

Barracuda Tax Abatement

The council considered setting a public hearing under Michigan’s Act 198 of 1974 on establishing an industrial development district for 317 Maynard St. in downtown Ann Arbor. Setting the hearing – for Aug. 9, 2012 – is the first of several actions that will be necessary to grant a tax abatement to Barracuda Networks, which is relocating from Depot Street to the downtown property owned by First Martin Corp. A letter dated June 1, 2012 from First Martin to the Ann Arbor city clerk requested the establishment of the district.

After the public hearing on the district, the council will need to vote on establishing the district. Then Barracuda Networks will need to apply for the abatement. The city council will need to vote to set another public hearing – this time on the abatement. And then the council will need to vote on the abatement itself. According to reports from Barracuda, the value of the abatement to be requested is estimated at around $85,000.

The city is prohibited by state statute from abating taxes on any more than 5% of the total state equalized value (SEV) of property in the city. Responding to an emailed query in May 2012 (in connection with a tax abatement for Sakti3), Tom Crawford, the city of Ann Arbor’s chief financial officer, wrote to The Chronicle that total SEV for the city for 2012 stands at $5,294,974,640, and the total SEV of abated property in 2012 is $8,935,974. That works out to 0.169% – well under 5%.

Outcome: Without discussion, the council voted to set a public hearing for Aug. 9, 2012 on establishing an industrial development district for 317 Maynard St.

Shell Station Rezoning, Site Plan

The council considered final approval of a request to revise the zoning regulations associated with the parcel on the northeast corner of Ann Arbor-Saline and West Eisenhower Parkway, where a Shell service station is located.

The city planning commission had previously voted unanimously to recommend approval of the zoning changes at its April 17, 2012 meeting.

The council was also asked to consider the site plan for the project.

Owners of the station are asking for revisions to the site’s planned unit development (PUD), which would allow them to build additions onto the existing 1,000-square-foot convenience store. The new additions would total 4,089 square feet, including 2,189 square feet to the north and east of the store. Their plan also calls for converting the 900-square-foot carwash area into new retail space. The existing access drive to the carwash would be landscaped, and the parking lot would be reconfigured for a new total of 16 spaces.

According to a planning staff memo, the PUD revisions were recommended because they are seen as providing an overall benefit to the city, by: (1) supporting the continued viability of retail options for the surrounding neighborhood; (2) creating job opportunities from this expansion; and (3) controlling the architectural design standards of this building as a gateway into the city.

The initial approval to the PUD rezoning was given at the council’s May 21, 2012 meeting.

Shell Station: Public Hearings

Separate public hearings were held on the PUD rezoning and the site plan.

Thomas Partridge was the only person who spoke at either hearing. He introduced himself as a resident and candidate to represent the 53rd District in the Michigan house of representatives. He called on the city council to come together behind a specific and firm commitment to affordability goals and environmental goals as part of the sustainability goals that were on that evening’s agenda. Those goals should include a commitment by service stations to support the public transportation system, he said. Service stations should be required to provide charging stations for electric vehicles, he contended. They should also be required to provide adaptable technology for hydrogen-powered vehicles.

Partridge called for the zoning change to be revised to require access to affordable housing.

Outcome: Without discussion, on separate votes, the council unanimously approved the site plan and rezoning request for the Shell station at the northeast corner of Ann Arbor-Saline and West Eisenhower Parkway.

City Membership in Washtenaw Health Initiative

The council considered a resolution that allows the city of Ann Arbor to become a member of the Washtenaw Health Initiative (WHI). The resolution altered the budget for fiscal year 2013 (which began July 1, 2012) by adding $10,000 of general fund money to the budget for the office of community development – to cover the membership fee for this year. The resolution also recommends consideration of renewing the membership next year. [The city of Ann Arbor adopts budgets only one year at a time.]

A goal of WHI is to help local health care providers handle an influx of an estimated 50,000 newly insured patients when federal health care reforms take effect in 2014. The goal is to develop a plan to provide better health care for the county’s low-income residents, the uninsured and people on Medicaid – prior to changes that will be mandated by the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, recently upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Currently, 2,719 people in Washtenaw County are already eligible for Medicaid but not enrolled – and of those, 958 are city of Ann Arbor residents.

The WHI is a collaboration co-chaired by former county administrator Bob Guenzel and retired University of Michigan treasurer Norman Herbert~~, along with Ellen Rabinowitz, executive director of the Washtenaw Health Plan~~. The effort is jointly sponsored by the UM Health System and Saint Joseph Mercy Health System, and facilitated by Marianne Udow-Phillips, director of the Center for Healthcare Research & Transformation – a joint venture of UM and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan.

Other partners involved in the project include the Ann Arbor/Ypsilanti Regional Chamber of Commerce, Arbor Hospice, Catholic Social Services, Dawn Farm, Hope Clinic, Huron Valley Ambulance, Integrated Health Associates, Packard Health, Planned Parenthood of Mid and South Michigan, United Way of Washtenaw County, and the Women’s Center of Southeastern Michigan.

The Washtenaw County board of commissioners voted on April 4, 2012 to make the county a member of WHI – and approved the $10,000 membership fee. The city and county are two of over 30 members of WHI, who have together contributed more than $100,000 to the effort.

Washtenaw Health Initiative: Council Deliberations

Appearing before the council were Bob Guenzel, community co-chair of WHI, and Marianne Udow-Phillips, director of the Center for Healthcare Research & Transformation. CHRT is facilitating the initiative, Udow-Phillips told the council.

Sabra Briere (Ward 1) noted that when the council had been briefed about the initiative at a previous working session, councilmembers had been told they’d eventually be asked for funding. Briere asked: What will the $10,000 help accomplish? Guenzel noted that WHI has been a voluntary effort led by the two major health systems in the area – the University of Michigan Health System and Saint Joseph Mercy Health System. Guenzel continued by saying that retired Saint Joseph Mercy Health System CEO Bob Laverty had started the effort and that Udow-Phillips had provided her organization’s support. The first year and a half, Guenzel said, the entire effort had been voluntary. They’d decided they didn’t want to incorporate as a 501(c)(3).

Instead, he said, they’re asking entities to become charter members of the organization. Many of the member agencies contribute in-kind support, he said – like the hospitals and safety-net clinics. For next year, Guenzel said, they’ve developed a budget of about $100,000. That will ensure the availability of a dedicated employee from Udow-Phillips’ CHRT.

Guenzel told the council that WHI had approached the two major health systems for support and they’d agreed to help with $30,000 each. But the two health systems also wanted the community to contribute a piece of the support. Guenzel said that WHI had asked the Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation, United Way and the Washtenaw County board of commissioners for $10,000 a year. So WHI was now asking the city to contribute the same amount that the county had contributed.

Guenzel felt that this approach is effective and efficient. CHRT has made a great commitment, he said, in terms of their expertise and their ability to draw other agencies together. Whether the Affordable Health Care Act was upheld or not, Guenzel said, WHI thinks the initiative is important. The Supreme Court ruling meant that it had gotten over one hurdle, but he expected there would be others.

Guenzel concluded by allowing he’d given a long answer to Briere’s question. Briere told him it had been a good answer.

Briere followed up by asking how WHI will dovetail with what the state of Michigan does. Udow-Phillips responded to Briere’s question by saying that assuming the state moves ahead with Medicaid expansion, the WHI efforts will help the community plan to provide access to health care for those who’ll be newly insured. Even if the state does not move ahead with an expansion of Medicaid, she said, then the state or the federal government will move ahead by establishing a health care exchange. That will result in 300,000-400,000 people in Michigan who will get subsidies to buy private health insurance. Many of those people will be in Washtenaw County, she said, so by planning, the county’s health care system will be able to serve these newly-insured people.

In Washtenaw County, Udow-Philips continued, there are about 28,000 people who are uninsured. About 13,000 of those would be eligible for Medicaid under a Medicaid expansion, and most of those would be eligible for a subsidy to purchase private insurance, if that’s the route that’s taken.

Tony Derezinski (Ward 2) said he’s happy to hear this news. Ann Arbor is a great place to retire, he said, because of the quality of the health care. He asked Udow-Philips if she’d looked at other community health plans before developing an approach. She indicated that the model was Massachusetts – and the planning that Massachusetts had failed to do. When more people became eligible, there were not enough providers to give them access, she said. Massachusetts had not done the kind of planning WHI is doing in this county, she said. Once the Affordable Health Care Act was passed, the WHI organizers decided they wanted to do the necessary planning. No other counties are doing the kind of planning WHI is doing, she said. She’d like Washtenaw to be a role model for other counties in Michigan.

Carsten Hohnke (Ward 5) thanked Udow-Philips for her efforts. If it turns out that WHI determines there’s a lack of health care capacity compared to the needs of the newly-insured, Hohnke wanted to know what some of the options are for expanding that capacity. Udow-Philips told Hohnke that they’re in the final stages of that analysis right now. Both major health systems are bringing in more practitioners to Washtenaw County, she said. But it’s important to make sure those practitioners serve the Medicaid population. So WHI is working with major safety-net providers – like the Packard Clinic, Ypsilanti Family Practice and the Taubman Center – to make sure practitioners will be available. Udow-Philips stressed that not just doctors are considered practitioners – it could mean nurse practitioners, she said. The preliminary numbers would be looked at the following week, she said, to look at what the gap in capacity might be.

Outcome: The council voted unanimously to approve the $10,000 of support for the Washtenaw Health Initiative.

Commission Appointments

The council considered confirmation of four nominations to three different commissions; all nominations had been made at the council’s previous meeting, on June 18, 2012.

Toward the end of the July 2 meeting, Ken Clein and Kirk Westphal were considered as appointments to the city planning commission. The late agenda slot is reserved for confirmation of mayoral nominations. The vast majority of board and commission appointments are made by the mayor.

However, nominations to the environmental commission and the greenbelt advisory commission are made by the council as a body. So those confirmation votes came relatively early in the meeting as a part of “council business.” The council considered John German’s nomination to the city’s environmental commission and Archer Christian’s nomination to the greenbelt advisory commission.

Appointments: Christian to Greenbelt

On the greenbelt advisory commission, Christian is replacing Mike Garfield. Garfield is director of the Ecology Center, a nonprofit based in Ann Arbor, and Ms. Christian is the center’s development director. Garfield was term-limited as a GAC member, having served two consecutive three-year terms. The spot vacated by Garfield is not designated for a representative of the Ecology Center. However, the nine-member commission includes two slots for representatives of environmental and/or conservation groups. The greenbelt advisory commission oversees the proceeds generated by two-thirds of the city’s open space and parkland preservation millage, which is levied at a rate of 0.5 mills.

Council deliberations were brief. Carsten Hohnke (Ward 5), who serves as the city council’s representative to the greenbelt advisory commission, reminded his colleagues that Ms. Christian is filling a slot on the commission designated for someone who works with a conservation organization. Christian also has a long history of involvement in land conservancy, Hohnke said.

Outcome: The council unanimously confirmed Archer Christian’s appointment to the greenbelt advisory commission.

Appointments: German to Environmental

John German’s term on the environmental commission expired in August 2011, but he has continued to serve. His nomination and confirmation amounted to formalizing what was already the case. German’s background includes work with Chrysler, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Honda, and the International Council for Clean Transportation.

Ann Arbor’s environmental commission was established 12 years ago through a city ordinance, with the charge to “advise and make recommendations to the city council and city administrator on environmental policy, environmental issues and environmental implications of all city programs and proposals on the air, water, land and public health.”

The council’s deliberations consisted of a reminder from Sabra Briere (Ward 1), one of the council’s representatives to the environmental commission, that German is currently serving on the commission, that his re-appointment was missed at its time of renewal last year. So the appointment the council would be making, she said, would extend retroactively. The three-year term would thus end on Aug. 7, 2014.

During her communications time, Briere also announced that applications for a vacancy on the commission would be considered at the commission’s next meeting. She encouraged people to apply.

Outcome: The council voted unanimously to confirm John German’s appointment to the environmental commission.

Appointments: Clein, Westphal to Planning

On the city planning commission, Ken Clein, a principal with Quinn Evans Architects, replaces Erica Briggs, who did not seek re-appointment. Among the architectural projects Clein has worked on locally are the University of Michigan’s Hill Auditorium renovation, the new Ann Arbor municipal center, and the Zingerman’s Deli expansion.

Kirk Westphal’s appointment was a re-appointment. Westphal is principal at Westphal Associates, a firm that produces video documentaries. He holds a master’s degree in urban planning from the University of Michigan. City planning commissioners serve three-year terms.

Outcome: The council voted unanimously to confirm the appointments of Ken Clein and Kirk Westphal to the planning commission.

Labor Agreements

The council considered separately three collective bargaining agreements with members of the Teamsters Local 214: with the police professional assistants (4 employees), the deputy chiefs (2 employees) and the civilian supervisors (~30 employees). Robyn Wilkerson, human resources and labor relations director for the city of Ann Arbor, responded to questions from Jane Lumm (Ward 2).

From left: Marcia Higgins (Ward 4) confers with Jane Lumm (Ward 2).

Lumm had questions about the new-hire pension program, which the city began implementing for its employees last year. It involves increasing the vesting period for the pension program from five years to 10 years, and calculating the pension based on a final average compensation of five years instead of three years. All of the collective bargaining agreements include no wage increase, but instead a lump sum payment of $1,000. The contracts for all three units are for two years, through June 30, 2014.

Wilkerson clarified for Lumm that the same pension program language is in previous agreements – for police and fire department employees. It’s now officially city-wide. Lumm inquired if it had been discussed by the council’s labor committee. Marcia Higgins (Ward 4) indicated that the policy had been considered and moved forward in June 2011.

Higgins, who serves as chair of the council’s labor committee, explained that the contracts came up quickly on the council’s agenda because the items move to the agenda when the bargaining units ratify the contracts. City administrator Steve Powers confirmed that the collective bargaining units had just ratified the agreements the previous Thursday. Lumm briefly mulled the possibility of asking for postponement, but decided simply to express her view that she feels strongly that the city needs to move to a defined contribution plan instead of the defined benefits plan it currently has. She reminded her colleagues that she had been prepared to bring forward a resolution on the night they’d deliberated on the FY 2013 budget – a resolution that would have directed the development of a defined contribution plan. That night she’d declined to put the resolution before the council, due to the meeting’s late hour, but she indicated at the July 2 meeting that she’d bring the proposal to the council’s budget committee.

Stephen Kunselman (Ward 3) observed that with the move to shorter, two-year contracts, the city would basically be in a phase of continuing negotiations. Wilkerson pointed out that they are all two-year agreements with wage re-openers after one year. She observed that since the state legislature has passed a law regulating how much public employers could contribute to employee health care, it means that the focus of the bargaining is on wages. Kunselman ventured that there would be plenty of time to address the issues if concerns come up.

Lumm asked how many employees were in the group of civilian supervisors. Wilkerson told her it was about 30. Lumm wanted to know if Wilkerson had a sense of how many new hires would be made in that category. Wilkerson indicated that based on what she was seeing in other departments, she thinks there will be a significant increase in retirees.

Outcome: On three separate votes, the council unanimously approved the collective bargaining agreements.

Weapons Screening Contract

On the July 2 agenda was a resolution to approve a contract with the Washtenaw County sheriff’s office. The city would pay $187,000 annually for the sheriff’s office to provide weapons screening services for the 15th District Court, located inside the city’s new justice center building at the corner of Fifth and Huron.

The contract pays $25.25 per hour per officer, with the number of officers estimated to be roughly three each day. Currently, the weapons screening takes place at metal detectors at the building’s entrance.

During the brief council deliberations, Jane Lumm (Ward 2) recalled the council’s previous discussion about the location of the security checkpoint within the building.

The city council engaged in lengthy deliberations at its April 2, 2012 meeting about the placement of the security check. The context of those deliberations was a vote on the acquisition of Ed Carpenter’s proposed “Radius” sculpture, at a cost of $150,000, to be installed in the lobby of the justice center building. As proposed, and eventually approved by the council, viewing the sculpture from inside the building during normal business hours would require going through a security check.

Lumm asked about a meeting of the city council’s building committee that had been mentioned at the time. City administrator Steve Powers told her that a meeting of that committee had been set for July 16. The meeting will include a discussion of the location of the security checkpoint.

Ballot Questions

The Ann Arbor city council has until its second meeting in August to put various questions before voters on the Nov. 6, 2012 ballot.

Ballot Questions: Charter Amendment on Leasing Parks

During communications time at its July 2 meeting, the council heard from Jane Lumm (Ward 2) that she and Mike Anglin (Ward 5) are working to bring a ballot question to Ann Arbor voters that would further tweak a city charter provision related to the sale of parkland.

The charter provision had been approved in November 2008 by a 81%-19% margin (42,969 to 9,944). The tweak would involve adding actions like “lease,” “license,” or “re-designate” to the set of actions on city parkland that require a voter referendum.

The 2008 ballot question had asked voters if they wanted to add a clause to the city charter that would prevent the sale of city parkland without a voter referendum. Michigan’s Home Rule City Act already lists among a city’s prohibited powers: “… to sell a park, cemetery, or any part of a park or cemetery, except where the park is not required under an official master plan of the city …” But that year some residents were concerned that the city was looking to sell Huron Hills golf course – and they saw the exception in the state statute as a possible loophole. The council voted to place the question before voters that year over dissent from councilmember Marcia Higgins (Ward 4) and former councilmember Leigh Greden.

That year, the council had consciously settled on wording that included just selling, as opposed to leasing. In an Oct. 31, 2008 Ann Arbor News article, mayor John Hieftje was quoted as follows: “From time to time, we’ve thought about how nice it might be to have a restaurant near the river. I think it’s something people would really enjoy … That would be impossible if the ballot measure was expanded to include leasing.”

What prompts the current desire to contemplate adding “leasing” and other arrangements to the mix is concern that a portion of Fuller Park could eventually be used for a new rail station. Amtrak currently operates a station on Depot Street near the Broadway bridges. [See coverage of the council's June 4, 2012 meeting, when it accepted a $2.8 million federal grant to complete a planning study to confirm the Fuller Road site as the locally preferred alternative location for a new rail station.]

One draft of the ballot question that Lumm and Anglin are crafting reads: “Shall the voters of the City of Ann Arbor amend the city charter to require that the city shall not sell, lease, license, re-categorize or repurpose, without the approval, by a majority vote of the electors of the city voting on the question at a regular or special election, any city park, or land in the city acquired for a park, cemetery, or any part thereof?” Lumm indicated that she’d bring the resolution to the council for a vote at its July 16 meeting.

Mike Anglin (Ward 5).

Lumm recounted much of the history of the previous charter amendment and thanked assistant city attorney Mary Fales for her help in drafting the ballot question.

Later during a second round of council communications, Anglin followed up on Lumm’s remarks. He described the history of the 2008 resolution as not enjoying support from some environmental groups – saying that many people knew the language was imperfect when it was presented. Still, Anglin said, the charter amendment was a way of moving something forward that was needed at the time. There’s always been a group of people who are interested in how to further protect our parks, he said. When the PROS (parks and recreation open space) plan was adopted [at the city council's March 7, 2011 meeting], Anglin said he refused to voted for it because he felt that the plan was not as assiduous as it should be about protecting the city’s own land.

From The Chronicle’s coverage of Anglin’s opposition to the PROS plan in early 2011:

Mike Anglin (Ward 5) weighed in saying that he was 95% in favor of the plan but had some problems with it that would lead him to vote against it. He then read aloud a statement with objections, including issues with the proposed Fuller Road Station and public-private partnerships in the parks.

Speaking about the upcoming charter amendment resolution, Anglin allowed that there are a number of “tricky” items in it. But he felt it’s important to continue to work to fulfill the intent of the 2008 charter amendment. He said he’d be talking to individual councilmembers about it, and he hoped it could make it onto the ballot in November.

Ballot Questions: Park Maintenance & Capital Improvements Millage

While council support for placing a parkland lease question on the November 2012 ballot is uncertain, it’s likely that the council will follow the park advisory commission’s recommendation to place a renewal of the parks maintenance and capital improvements millage on the ballot. Christopher Taylor (Ward 3), who is one of two council ex officio members of PAC, indicated that consideration of that millage question would take place at the council’s July 16 meeting.

Taylor described PAC’s approach in evaluating the millage renewal as a long and diligent process to put the renewal of the existing parks millage before voters in November. PAC has also recommended that the council re-affirm the administrative policies that guide the use of the taxes generated by the millage.

Ballot Questions: Art, Non-Partisan Elections?

Other possible ballot questions that have received some consideration by councilmembers include a charter amendment that would make city elections non-partisan.

And during deliberations on May 7, 2012 about a piece of public art to be commissioned for the city’s new justice center, Stephen Kunselman (Ward 3) mentioned the possibility of establishing a millage just for public art. That would require placing a question on the ballot.

Locally, any city of Ann Arbor ballot questions might be joined by one that is likely to be put forward by the Ann Arbor District Library to support a downtown building project. A countywide transportation millage is less likely to be placed on the November ballot, given the delays in approval of all the necessary documents.

Communications and Comment

Every city council agenda contains multiple slots for city councilmembers and the city administrator to give updates or make announcements about issues that are coming before the city council. And every meeting typically includes public commentary on subjects not necessarily on the agenda.

Comm/Comm: Voting

During his turn at public commentary at the conclusion of the meeting, Thomas Partridge called on all clerks in all jurisdictions in the next few days to promote voter registration before the deadline [July 9, 2012 for the Aug. 7, 2012 primary].

Example of a voter registration card recently mailed to Ann Arbor residents.

It’s important that citizens express themselves at the polls, Partridge said. Voting should be made more accessible and barriers to voting must be removed, he said. It should also be possible to vote without producing undue amounts of personal information and documentation. He also stated that serious consideration should be given to internet voting in the state of Michigan

And during his communications time at the start of the meeting, city administrator Steve Powers noted that residents have received in the mail an updated voter registration card. The reason for that is related to redistricting in connection with the 2010 census. The outcome of the changes in the city ward boundaries had not changed the voting location for the vast majority of residents, Powers noted, but the notification is required by law to be sent out.

Comm/Comm: Pool Closing

During his communications time, city administrator Steve Powers reported that the closure of Veterans Memorial Park pool had been caused by a pump failure – caused by a small towel getting into the mechanism. Staff are looking at ways to prevent that in the future, he said. [The pool is expected to be closed until July 11, 2012.]

Comm/Comm: 4-3 Jackson Lane Conversion

At its April 2, 2012 meeting, the Ann Arbor city council voted to submit a request to the Michigan Dept. of Transportation to convert the segment of Jackson Road between Maple Road and South Revena from four traffic lanes to three. At the council’s July 2 meeting, during his communications time, Mike Anglin (Ward 5) called that action by the council premature. [He and Jane Lumm (Ward 2) had voted against submitting the request.] Because of the public outcry, Anglin said, MDOT had scheduled another meeting: on Tuesday, July 10 from 5-8 p.m. at Abbott Elementary School, 2670 Sequoia Parkway.

Anglin said that commuters, who will be affected by the conversion, are also part of the community. He allowed that he’d also heard from members of the bicycling community on the issue [many of whom support the lane conversion].

Comm/Comm: Affordable Services

As he typically does, Thomas Partridge addressed the city council at the beginning of the meeting during public commentary reserved time and at the conclusion of the meeting as well. During his first turn at public commentary, he told councilmembers he’s running for state representative in the 53rd District of the Michigan house of representatives. He called for greater attention to affordable housing, transportation, health care and education. He also stated that it’s important to provide economic development and job growth for the city, the county and the region. As a representative, he said, he’d take on these goals and build from the ground up and fully fund these areas.

Comm/Comm: Smart Meters

Several people reprised public commentary from previous council meetings – on the topic of “smart meters,” which can record electricity consumption at relatively small intervals (less than an hour). The meters then communicate that usage information to the utility for monitoring and billing purposes. For the first time at an Ann Arbor city council meeting, a resident questioned the scientific and health claims made by those who oppose installation of the meters.

DTE smart meter.

Linda Kurtz expressed her objection to smart meters based on health effects. She described the biological mechanism by which smart meters affect the human body – by disrupting the regular voltage differences across cellular membranes. RF radiation dislodges calcium ions and causes membranes to leak, she contended, and it disrupts the blood-brain barrier.

Carol Neylon called it unconscionable that DTE has been allowed to install smart meters. She cited a multitude of independent issues, including personal privacy concerns and health issues. She contended that in Toronto, where such meters had been installed, the impact had been that customers received higher bills. She was concerned about the ability of DTE to shut off someone’s power remotely and to track energy usage 24/7. She characterized smart meter installation as being about a big company doing whatever it takes to make profits.

Bethanni Grecynski cited privacy concerns. She expressed concern about the ability to hack the system and obtain people’s energy consumption information. Although an option was being discussed to opt out of smart meter installation, she contended that it would cost $50/month. Many people can’t afford to pay that. She also contended that the smart meters can cause people’s bills to go up. She questioned whether it’s fair that only the rich can opt out – that didn’t seem like an American idea to her.

But her real interest, said Grecynski, is health. She allowed that statistics have shown the smart meters are safe – but she asked councilmembers to remember how cigarettes and processed food were once thought to be safe.

Nanci Gerler told councilmembers that she’d lived in Ann Arbor 44 years. She noted that she had appeared before the city council previously. She’s not happy about the continued installation of smart meters in the community. A recent meeting about smart meters held at Crazy Wisdom bookstore was standing-room only, she reported, so concern is growing. She noted that a Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) report recommends an opt-out provision. Now, she said, DTE has 90 days to respond. But in the meantime, the community will be saturated with smart meters, she said. She contended that the effect is already palpable for those who are hypersensitive to electromagnetic radiation.

Michael Benson introduced himself as a Ward 2 resident, but wanted to address the council as a graduate student in the University of Michigan radiation laboratory. He deals with electromagnetic radiation on a regular basis, he said. He’s not an expert, he allowed, but felt it was appropriate to provide a few facts. He noted that public commenters had said that smart meters provide additional RF radiation – sure, that’s true, he said. A cell phone, or a computer, or even the microphone he was speaking into are radiating a little bit. The FCC provides standards for levels of radiation that are acceptable, he continued, and testing is done by the NIH (National Institutes of Health). Cell phones operate at a maximum of 1W of transmitting power compared to smart meters at 250 mW – or about 1/4 the level of a cell phone, he said. Those figures are the maximum – and they’re often below that, he said.

Benson also observed that during public commentary, councilmembers had heard about electromagnetic hypersensitivity. He contended that WebMD is a pretty good reference source for medical conditions, and this condition is not listed on WebMD. Benson told the council he was not there to comment on the public policy issue of smart meters, but as far as the science goes, he suggested that councilmembers take everything they’d heard “with a grain of salt.”

By way of anecdotal illustration, no apparent impact can be seen on The Chronicle’s measured residential electricity use since installation of a smart meter in March 2012:

Over the last four fiscal years, electricity usage at The Chronicle’s residence has shown essentially the same seasonal variation. Green bars are the most recent year. Lines are previous years.

In this gas-furnace house (thermostat 60 F), supplemented by electric space heaters, the electricity usage (blue bars) patterns with heating/cooling degree days.

Comm/Comm: Dream Nite Club Lawsuit

During his communications time, city attorney Stephen Postema told the council that before that night’s meeting, Tony Derezinski (Ward 2) had asked Postema to mention the Dream Nite Club cases. [The city had taken steps that led to the revocation of the club's liquor license. For some previous Chronicle coverage, see the March 19, 2012 city council meeting report.]

Four significant rulings – two in federal court and two in state court – had gone the city’s way, Postema reported. The ruling illustrated the importance of the process the city followed, he said. The courts had upheld every aspect of the city’s action. Postema stressed that a liquor license does not involve just rights, but also responsibilities.

Postema described Derezinski’s handling of the liquor license hearing, over which Derezinski had presided, as requiring “great patience.” Postema felt like the judges in the cases had read the entire transcript of the hearing. The conclusion had been that all the due process elements were met. Postema stated that the city was ready to be challenged, and it was gratifying to have the courts confirm the city’s position. He also emphasized that the entire process associated with revoking the Dream Nite Club liquor license had taken a lot of work – and people sometimes forget the amount of work that it takes to do the business of the city.

Not reported by Postema to the council at their meeting was the filing earlier that day, July 2, of a motion to set aside the judgment that had been made against the Dream Nite Club owners by judge Paul Borman. The motion seeks to set aside the judgment and to file an amended complaint. The amended complaint lists out a number of specific allegations, including the use of racial epithets by individual Ann Arbor police department officers in their interactions with Dream Nite Club management staff. The amended complaint alleges that AAPD officers had indicated a desire to shut down the club because of its black clientele, and had scrutinized black patrons in a manner that white patrons were not forced to undergo.

The original complaint did not include those specific allegations.

Borman’s opinion in dismissing the case had been based on the unamended complaint. Borman’s ruling relied in part on a U.S. Supreme Court case, Ashcroft v. Iqbal (2009).

Defendant City of Ann Arbor’s increase in police activity outside of Plaintiffs’ nightclub after a violent incident may have incidentally impacted the racial minorities who happen to patronize Plaintiffs’ nightclub, but the purpose of increasing the police presence was not to target racial minorities. The facts alleged impel the conclusion that police activity increased as a result of crime at and in the vicinity of the nightclub. Thus, Plaintiffs’ conclusory allegations of racial animus “are … not entitled to be assumed true.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 681.

Inferring racially discriminatory intent from the sequence of events alleged in the Complaint, as Plaintiffs ask the Court to do, requires an inferential leap that is not supported by the facts.

The Iqbal case was significant, because it’s been analyzed as signaling a change in the basic way that courts are supposed to consider motions to dismiss a case. Following Iqbal requires district courts to distinguish allegations that are statements of fact from those that are conclusions of law. It’s been analyzed as a return to “fact pleading” – which requires a claim to include all the relevant facts in support of the claims that have been asserted. From 1938 until Iqbal, the prevailing system had been “notice pleading,” which requires only sufficient facts to put someone on notice about the claims asserted against them. Under “notice pleading,” the expectation is the facts would be introduced partly under the discovery process – where a plaintiff would be able to depose witnesses and subpoena additional documents from a defendant.

Comm/Comm: Human Rights

Sandi Smith (Ward 1) who also serves on the city’s human rights commission, announced that the commission is partnering with the Michigan Department of Civil Rights to hold a public hearing on Thursday, July 12, from 6:30-9 p.m. in the city council chambers in city hall. The purpose of this hearing is to hear testimony on discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity – especially as it relates to the Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act.

Comm/Comm: Nuclear Weapons

Odile Hugonot Haber addressed the council on the topic of nuclear weapons. She recalled how 10 years ago she’d organized a week-long teach-in on nuclear weapons. She lamented the fact that not very much progress is being made – nuclear states are not reducing their stocks. The weapons will be smaller and meaner, she said. We’re spending a trillion dollars on nuclear weapons rather than on life, she said, and that’s concerning to her.

Comm/Comm: Half-Crosswalks

Kathy Griswold told the council that in the course of her work to document crosswalks and intersections that do not have adequate sight distance, she’d noticed two crosswalks that are only “half a crosswalk.” One is in front of Casey’s Tavern on Depot Street – on the north side of the street there’s not anything, but on the south side there’s a curbcut. The other location is on Traver at Nixon. She said there’s a curbcut on the south side of the street, but nothing on the north side.

Present: Jane Lumm, Mike Anglin, Margie Teall, Sabra Briere, Sandi Smith, Tony Derezinski, Stephen Kunselman, Marcia Higgins, Christopher Taylor, Carsten Hohnke.

Absent: John Hieftje.

Next council meeting: Monday, July 16, 2012 at 7 p.m. in the council chambers at 301 E. Huron. [confirm date]

The Chronicle could not survive without regular voluntary subscriptions to support our coverage of public bodies like the Ann Arbor city council. Click this link for details: Subscribe to The Chronicle. And if you’re already supporting us, please encourage your friends, neighbors and colleagues to help support The Chronicle, too!

City Council Expands North Main Task Force

Dave Askins — Fri, 25 May 2012 12:45:06 +0000

Ann Arbor city council meeting (May 21, 2012) Part 1: Although the council’s meeting did not conclude until around 1:30 a.m., the late hour was not attributable to the relatively heavy agenda. It was due to the extensive deliberations on the fiscal year 2013 budget, which the council finally approved over dissent from two of its members. A breakdown of amendments to the budget is included in The Chronicle’s report filed from the meeting. Deliberations on those budget amendments are covered in the forthcoming Part 2 of this meeting report.

From left: Councilmembers Sandi Smith (Ward 1) and Sabra Briere (Ward 1). The two had co-sponsored a resolution establishing a task force to study the North Main Street and Huron River corridor. (Photos by the writer.)

In addition to the budget, the council efficiently dispatched with a fairly packed agenda of regular items, which are covered in this part of the meeting report. The item generating the most discussion was a follow-up to action taken at the council’s previous meeting on May 7, to establish a task force to study the North Main Street and Huron River corridor.

That resolution had provided for nine task force members representing different constituencies. At the May 21 meeting, a resolution was brought forward to add three members. A debate unfolded about whether to add a fourth member – from the Ann Arbor public art commission – to the mix. Ultimately that addition was approved narrowly on a 6-5 vote on the 11-member council.

While the North Main task force is meant to develop a vision for future land use in the corridor, the council took action on several current land use items too. Winning easy approval were a site plan for Allen Creek Preschool on Miller Avenue, and a rezoning and site plan for Michigan AAA on South Main Street. The council also quickly approved six routine rezoning requests associated with annexation from a township into the city of Ann Arbor. And councilmembers gave initial approval to revisions of the planned unit development regulations for a Shell service station on Ann Arbor-Saline and West Eisenhower Parkway.

Associated with these land use items were a total of 10 separate public hearings. However, no one addressed the council during any of those hearings.

The city’s park system made it onto the agenda in a few different ways. First, a consent agenda item was pulled out for separate consideration to highlight the fact that renovations to South University Park were being funded with a $50,000 gift that had been made by a couple – Leslie and Michael Morris – who previously lived next to the park. The council also approved the lease of a 40-space parking lot near Argo Canoe liveries to meet additional demand for river trips that has been generated by construction of the Argo Cascades bypass around the dam.

Related to open space outside the city were the reappointments of two members of the greenbelt advisory commission – Peter Allen and Catherine Riseng. The commission overseas a portion of the city’s open space and parkland preservation millage.

Financial issues considered by the council included initial approval to increase water, sewer and stormwater rates that will together generate an additional $1.7 million in annual revenue. The council also approved a tax abatement for Sakti3, a battery technology company in Ann Arbor that is looking to expand its operation here.

Other items on the agenda included receipt of a federal grant to develop a strategy for improved energy efficiency in rental housing, as well as a grant administered for laptop computers to be used as electronic pollbooks. The computers are used for election record-keeping, not for casting ballots. The council also gave initial approval to an ordinance revision that relieves homeowners of responsibility for maintaining sidewalks adjacent to their property for the duration of the sidewalk-repair millage, which voters approved in November 2011.

North Main Task Force Positions

On the May 21 agenda was an item adding three positions to a task force to study the corridor along North Main Street and the Huron River: a member of the city council, someone from the boating/fishing community of river users, and a representative from the Huron River Citizens Association. During the meeting, an amendment was offered to add a member of the Ann Arbor public art commission (AAPAC) to the task force, too.

When the task force was established at the council’s May 7, 2012 meeting, the membership had included the following: one member of the park advisory commission, one member of the planning commission, one resident representing the Water Hill neighborhood, one resident representing the North Central neighborhood, one resident from the Old Fourth Ward, one resident representing the Broadway/Pontiac neighborhood, two business and property owners from the affected area, and one member of the Huron River Watershed Council.

The task force is charged with delivering a report to the city council more than a year from now – by July 31, 2013 – that describes “a vision to create/complete/enhance pedestrian and bike connection from downtown to Bandemer and Huron River Drive, increase public access to the river-side amenities of existing parks in the North Main-Huron River corridor, ease traffic congestion at Main and Depot at certain times of a day and recommend use of MichCon property at Broadway; …”

Earlier than that – by the end of 2012 – the task force is to make recommendations on the use of the city-owned 721 N. Main parcel.

The creation of the task force comes in the context of the city’s application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency for funds to demolish two former maintenance yard buildings on the city-owned 721 N. Main parcel. The application has been approved by FEMA, but is pending the update of the city’s All-Hazard plan, which had expired and is being updated. FEMA is willing to help fund the demolition, because the two buildings are located in the floodway. The city council’s eventual acceptance of the FEMA grant will require a deed restriction on development in the floodway portion of the parcel.

North Main Task Force Positions: Council Deliberations

Sandi Smith (Ward 1), who had co-sponsored the initial creation of the task force, led off the discussion by saying that the council had been inundated with requests about the task force, and that had prompted the addition of three more categories.

Tony Derezinski (Ward 2) said he felt one segment of the community that should be included is the public art commission. It’s important to make the entrances to the city beautiful, he said, so he wanted a representative from the public art commission on the task force. Sabra Briere (Ward 1) thanked Derezinski for that suggestion. She noted that there truly are so many possible voices that could be heard on the task force.

But Briere worried that the task force could become overcrowded. The task force had been given very tight deadlines, she said. She reported that she’d encouraged interested people to attend the task force meetings and participate, even if they can’t vote. She said she lacked clarity on the parameters for public art – whether the money can be used for non-original decorative pieces, for example. So she hesitated to say where the role of the public art commission member could be on a task force that’s more visionary than practical at this point. Adding a representative from the public art commission would move it up to 13 voting members, which pushes the envelope of practicality, she felt.

Derezinski made a formal motion to amend the resolution to add a representative from the public art commission. If Briere was not clear about the parameters for public art, Derezinski said she should attend the commission meetings or read the annual report. To him the idea of making the entrance beautiful “sort of implies art.”

Carsten Hohnke (Ward 5).

Smith respected the idea of having art be a part of this, but said there is not necessarily a specific project the task force is meant to study – because their responsibility is much broader than a specific project. Later in the process, she felt, it’d be appropriate to bring in someone from the public art commission. However, she couldn’t support it now.

Mike Anglin (Ward 5) said there’s a continuing discussion about how to better integrate art into the city. He felt it’s possible that someone from the public art commission could help influence the visioning. Carsten Hohnke (Ward 5) asked if there are capital projects known to be a part of the task force effort. Briere responded to Hohnke, saying yes and no. She noted that the city staff will be applying for additional grants for 721 N. Main [from the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund and from the Washtenaw County parks and recreation commission]. She felt that counts as capital improvement. However, the task force’s job is to talk about how best to use the site, not to build or approve a capital project. She imagined that capital projects would come out of this – for example, if there’s a tunnel or a bridge built to get across the railroad tracks, that’s a capital improvement.

Derezinski felt that Briere’s answer to Hohnke’s question was a yes. Derezinski contended that the task force had started off by looking at an entrance to the city. When you start to plan your vision, he said, art should be a part of the vision – and entrances to the city are critically important. The art should not be just an add-on. He said he would like Ann Arbor to be known as an art city. The resolution was already adding three additional members, he said, so he wanted to add one more.

Marcia Higgins (Ward 4) indicated that this was a case where she’d defer to the people who brought the resolution on the task force forward – and it appeared that they don’t want to add one more member at this time.

She noted that there are other corridor studies going on – for Washtenaw Avenue and South State Street –and no one from the public art commission is on those committees. She felt that the North Main task force is not yet at a point where it needed a member from the public art commission. She wouldn’t support the amendment, she told Derezinski, but she did support what he was trying to do.

Outcome on the amendment: The council voted 6-5 in support of the amendment to add a member to the task force from the public art commission. Voting for the additional member were Tony Derezinski (Ward 2), Christopher Taylor (Ward 3), Margie Teall (Ward 4), Carsten Hohnke (Ward 5), Mike Anglin (Ward 5), and mayor John Hieftje.

Mayor John Hieftje told Derezinski that it was now Derezinski’s task to find a member of the public art commission to add. [Derezinski serves on the public art commission. Two day's later, the public art commission met and recommended that Connie Rizzolo Brown be appointed to the task force.]

Jane Lumm (Ward 2) noted that there’d been a desire expressed by the Greenway Conservancy to be part of the task force, too. She worried that a group as large as 13 might be too large to be effective, and that’s why she had not voted for Derezinski’s amendment.

Outcome: The council voted unanimously to add the four positions to the North Main/Huron River task force.

The appointment of actual members to the task force has not yet been made. Sandi Smith (Ward 1) indicated that the complete set of names might be expected by the council’s June 4 meeting. Later in the council meeting, Hieftje gave the following names, which will be formally appointed at the June 4 meeting: Darren McKinnon (Water Hill representative); David Santacroce (North Central neighborhood representative); Ray Detter (Old Fourth Ward representative); Tamara Burns (Broadway/Pontiac neighborhood representative); Julie Grand (park advisory commission representative); Erica Briggs (planning commission representative); Paul Ganz and Mike Martin (business & property owners of the affected area representative); Sandi Smith (councilmember); Rita Combest (Huron River/Newport neighborhoods representative); Cynthia Ives (boating/fishing/river users representative). Not yet determined is the representative from the Huron River Watershed Council. And the public art commissioners subsequently recommended Connie Rizzolo Brown to represent the commission.

Allen Creek Preschool Site Plan

The council considered a site plan for the Allen Creek Preschool, located at 2350 Miller Ave.

The site plan had been recommended unanimously for approval by the Ann Arbor planning commission at its April 17, 2012 meeting. The commission also granted a special exception use for the project.

The project entails building a one-story, 929-square-foot addition onto the west end of an existing 3,111-square-foot preschool building, for a new total of 4,040 square feet. The preschool has an agreement with the Korean Methodist Church at 1526 Franklin Street to use eight parking spaces at the church lot. On-street parking is available on Miller Avenue and Franklin Street.

The special exception use is required because the project is located on a site zoned R1C (single-family dwelling district). According to a staff memo, the preschool includes programs for children up to 5 years old, with one or two afternoon enrichment classes serving children up to 8 years old. The programs will have a maximum of 14 students each (with 8 for young children attending with their parents) and one or two staff members teaching the programs. The preschool programs will be held mornings on Mondays through Thursdays, with enrichment classes held in the late afternoons. The number of children at the preschool will increase from 25 to 42, with a maximum of 50 in the future.

In December 2010, the planning commission had previously granted special exception use and recommended site plan approval for a project proposed by the preschool at a different location. That plan had called for demolishing the existing building and constructing a new 1,101-square-foot preschool building in a residentially zoned district at 1515 Franklin St. The preschool subsequently decided to pursue a different project.

The site plan (but not the special exception use) required approval by city council.

Outcome: Without deliberation, the council unanimously approved the Allen Creek Preschool site plan.

Shell Station Rezoning

The council gave initial consideration to a request to revise the zoning regulations associated with the parcel on the northeast corner of Ann Arbor-Saline and West Eisenhower Parkway, where a Shell service station is located.

The city planning commission had previously voted unanimously to recommend approval of the zoning changes at its April 17, 2012 meeting.

Outcome: Without deliberation, the council gave unanimous initial approval to the Shell station PUD revision. Because changes to the PUD regulations are a change to the city’s zoning code, hence to the city’s ordinances, the initial approval by the council at its May 21 meeting will need to be followed by a second and final approval after a public hearing at a subsequent meeting.

AAA Site Plan, Rezoning

The council considered final approval of a rezoning request from AAA Michigan and the site plans for two separate parcels that are part of the same project on South Main Street. The council had given initial approval to the rezoning request at its May 7 meeting.

The rezoning request was to change half of a parcel located at 1200 S. Main to the P (parking) zoning designation.

The rezoning to P (parking) is part of a two-parcel site plan proposal – for which the city planning commission provided a positive recommendation at its March 6, 2012 meeting. At that meeting, the commission took two votes on the 1200 S. Main parcel – the site plan and the rezoning proposal. And on both votes, the planning commission split 6-3. For the other, adjacent parcel at 1100 S. Main, the city planning commission voted unanimously to recommend the site plan for approval.

The two parcels, at 1100 and 1200 S. Main, are across from Michigan Stadium. An AAA branch built in the 1950s is located there. The owner wants to build a new branch on a different part of the site, tear down the existing building, and reconfigure parking spaces.

The two parcels are part of a 1.5-acre site containing four parcels owned by the auto club and all zoned O (office). Located on the 1200 S. Main parcel is the current one-story branch building with walk-out basement and 36 parking spaces, with exits onto South Main, Berkley and Potter.

The 1100 S. Main site is a surface parking lot, which has 72 spaces and exits onto both Potter and Keech. The owner is requesting to build a one-story, 5,443-square-foot new branch building on the northeast corner of that site, with parking for 21 spaces. A second phase of the project would include an eventual 2,230-square-foot addition to the south side of that building. There are six landmark trees on the site, and the plan would require removal of two that are located along South Main, near Keech. Other trees would be added elsewhere on the site.

After the new structure is completed, the old building at 1200 S. Main would be torn down and a 14-space parking lot would be put on that parcel. And to do that, the proposal asked that the northern 123 feet of that parcel – about half of the parcel – be rezoned from O (office) to P (parking), so that parking could become the principal use for that site. A site plan for that parcel is also required.

The owner’s overall plan called for a total of 35 spaces – a reduction from the current parking on the site, which was approved in the mid-1970s but no longer conforms with existing zoning. The 35 spaces would be four more spaces than the 31 maximum number permitted under the O (office) zoning, based on the new building’s square footage in both phases. That’s why the owner requested that a portion of the overall site be rezoned for parking – in the P (parking) district, there is no maximum.

The council’s deliberations were brief. Margie Teall (Ward 4) got confirmation from city planning manager Wendy Rampson that the intent was not to build a parking structure on the site, but rather to have a surface parking lot.

Outcome: The council unanimously approved all three resolutions related to the Michigan AAA site.

South University Park Improvements

On the council’s consent agenda was an item to approve a $43,533 contract with Terra-Firma Landscape Inc. to make improvements to South University Park.

Photo from the June 21, 2011 park advisory commission meeting, when the Morrises announced their gift of $50,000 to rehab South University Park. From left: Michael Morris and Leslie Morris, and Colin Smith, the city's parks and recreation manager.

The work includes removal of trees and shrubs, replacement of the basketball court, removal of the bench and dilapidated kiosk, and installation of three new benches, installation of a new concrete walk that bisects the park, a picnic table, and native flowering trees and shrubs as well as extensive grading to the site.

Consent agenda items are moved and voted on as a group, but can be separated out at the request of any councilmember. Jane Lumm (Ward 2) pulled out this resolution for special consideration to review the list of improvements.

What’s noteworthy, Lumm said, is that they’re being funded by a $50,000 donation from Leslie and Michael Morris, who previously lived by the park and would like to see it improved.

Lumm also highlighted the past service of Leslie Morris on the Ann Arbor city council and the park advisory commission.

Outcome: The council unanimously approved the contract with Terra-Firma Landscape Inc. to make improvements to South University Park.

Supplemental Argo Livery Parking

The council considered a resolution approving a $2,500 lease with Huron River Holdings Inc. to use a parking lot near 416 Longshore Drive on weekends and holidays from May 26, 2012 to Sept. 3, 2012 to supplement parking for patrons at the Argo Canoe Livery. [Combined, the Argo and Gallup canoe liveries in Ann Arbor are the largest in the state of Michigan, according to livery manager Cheryl Saam.] It’s expected that the increased user fees at the livery, especially in connection with increased rentals due to the new Argo Dam bypass – called the Argo Cascades – will offset the cost of the lease.

Council deliberations consisted of Sabra Briere (Ward 1) remarking that she is glad more parking is being secured [the lot offers 40 spaces]. However, she ventured that still more parking in the area would be needed as the city had created additional demand through the construction of the Argo Cascades.

Outcome: The council unanimously approved the lease to provide overflow parking.

Greenbelt Commission Reappointments

The council considered approval of the reappointment of Peter Allen and Catherine Riseng to the city’s greenbelt advisory commission. The group is responsible for overseeing a portion of the city’s open space and parkland preservation millage.

The greenbelt advisory commission is one of the few boards and commissions for which the nominations to serve come from the city council as a body, not from the mayor. The item had been on the council’s agenda at its May 7 meeting – but only inadvertently. It had been intended only as a communication item. The council voted to postpone consideration of the reappointment until the May 21 meeting.

The commission’s membership is defined in terms of qualifications in different categories. Allen fills the slot on the commission designated for a real estate developer. Riseng fills a slot designated for a plant or animal biologist. According to her University of Michigan faculty profile, Riseng is an “aquatic ecologist with specific focus on fluvial ecosystems and benthic invertebrate ecology.”

The complete slate of membership positions include the following: two members to serve as representatives of environmental or conservation groups; one member who is an agricultural landowner or operates an agricultural business; one member who is a real estate development professional; one member who is a plant or animal professional; one member who is a plant or animal biologist; three members from the public-at-large; one member of the Ann Arbor city council.

The city council representative to the greenbelt advisory commission is Carsten Hohnke (Ward 5). In re-introducing the reappointments, Hohnke noted that both Allen and Riseng have provided their substantial expertise in service of the commission.

Outcome: The council voted unanimously to reappoint Allen and Riseng to the greenbelt advisory commission for three-year terms.

Water, Sewer Rate Increases

The council gave initial consideration to increased rates for drinking water, sanitary sewer and stormwater. According to a staff memo, the increases on an average single-family customer come to 3.21% across three different rate tiers – assuming the same level of consumption as last year. That 3.21% increase works out to $19.40 per year. [.pdf of water, sewer rates]

History of Ann Arbor water rates, showing the introduction of tiered rates. (Image links to Google Chart.)

Because the water and sewer rates are part of a city ordinance, the council will need to vote a second and final time on the rates, after a public hearing.

By way of illustration of the rates, the drinking water rate for the vast majority of residential customers is tiered, based on usage. For the first 7 “units” of water, the charge is proposed to increase from $1.27 to $1.31. For the next 21 units, the charge is proposed to increase from $2.64 to $2.74 per unit. And for the 17 units after that, the increase is proposed to be from $4.50 to $4.69. For additional amounts more than 45 units, the charge is proposed to increase from $6.50 to $6.78 per unit.

One hundred cubic feet is 748 gallons. So a rate of $1.31 per unit translates to significantly less than a penny a gallon – $0.00175.

Ann Arbor’s tiered rate system was implemented in 2004. Before that, the rate for all usage levels was the same. In 2003, that was $1.97 per unit. In 2004, the lowest tier was dropped to $0.97. This year’s rate for the lowest tier is still less than what the general rate was in 2003.

Council deliberations were brief. Sabra Briere (Ward 1) led off by saying that Ann Arbor has always had some of the lowest rates compared to other communities. And she noted that those who use the least amount of water pay less.

Jane Lumm (Ward 2) felt the council shouldn’t gloss over something that results in generating that much additional revenue. The rate increases are expected to generate $664,834 more for the water fund, $916,577 more for the sanitary sewer fund, and $184,064 for the stormwater fund. But the increases are in the 3-4% range, she said, which she felt is reasonable and she would support the changes. None of the councilmembers take this change lightly, she said. The rates are competitive. The additional revenues are necessary to fund debt service and new capital projects. The increases are not insignificant but are reasonable, she said. Mayor John Hieftje said he appreciated the mention of Ann Arbor’s rates as compared to other municipalities.

Outcome: Councilmembers unanimously voted to give initial approval to the rate increases.

Sakti3 Tax Abatement

The council considered a tax abatement for Sakti3 – a battery technology spinoff from the University of Michigan. Sakti3 is led by UM professor Ann Marie Sastry.

The council had postponed their vote on the tax abatement at the council’s May 7 meeting – at the request of Marcia Higgins (Ward 4), who wanted the matter referred first to the council’s budget committee.

Marcia Higgins (Ward 4).

According to a staff memo accompanying the resolution, the abatement would be on $151,433 of real property improvements and $1,374,861 of new personal property. According to a memo from city financial staff, the value of the tax incentive to Sakti3 over three years totals $36,000.

Reasons given in the staff memo for the abatement include the need for Sakti3 to expand and add new equipment for the continually changing alternative energy business and the expected addition of five new employees due to the firm’s expansion. The memo concludes that the retention and expansion of such operations is consistent with the economic development goals of the city of Ann Arbor and of Ann Arbor SPARK.

Previously, the council voted on March 21, 2011 to set a public hearing on the establishment of the industrial development district under which Sakti3 is applying for an abatement. And on April 4, 2011, the city council approved the establishment of that district.

The city is prohibited by state statute from abating taxes on any more than 5% of the total state equalized value of property in the city. Responding to an emailed query, city of Ann Arbor chief financial officer Tom Crawford wrote to The Chronicle that total SEV for the city for 2012 stands at $5,294,974,640, and the total SEV of abated property in 2012 is $8,935,974. That works out to 0.169% – well under 5%.

At the May 21 meeting, the council moved the item forward on the agenda so it could be considered early in the evening. The brief deliberations consisted of a report from Higgins, who noted that the council’s budget committee had met to discuss the abatement, and had recommended that the request be moved forward to the council for approval. Higgins chairs the budget committee.

Outcome: The council unanimously approved the Sakti3 tax abatement.

Sustainability Grant

The council considered authorizing receipt of $256,000 to create a community-scale energy strategy to increase energy efficiency improvements in rental housing.

The rationale for the project, according to a staff memo, is to address energy costs that are regressive, because renters often pay more on utilities due to the condition of rental housing stock. That is, higher energy costs affect poorer renters more. The grant will be used to develop a strategy to address inefficiencies in rental housing and thereby increase the affordability of rental housing stock.

The money was awarded to the city as part of a larger $3 million grant given last year to Washtenaw County through the U.S. Housing and Urban Development Community Challenge Planning Grant (CCPG). According to the city staff memo, the goal of the Washtenaw County grant is “to expand existing affordable and energy efficient housing options and connect them to job centers and healthy food through an enhanced multi-modal transportation corridor.”

The corridor in question is Washtenaw Avenue, between Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti.

The $256,000 will be used by Ann Arbor for a rental housing energy efficiency project that is planned to last through December of 2014. Of the $256,000, $210,000 is budgeted for labor to hire a project manager and $46,000 is budgeted for marketing and outreach.

Matching funds totaling $370,000 have been pledged: $50,000 from the Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality grant supporting Michigan Green Communities; $60,000 from the Home Depot Foundation Sustainability Framework; and $260,000 from the city’s PACE/A2energy.org energy efficiency financing and community outreach efforts.

Outcome: The council unanimously approved the receipt of the grant.

Electronic Pollbooks for All Ann Arbor Precincts

The council considered approval of a $32,850 grant from the state of Michigan, funded through the Help America Vote Act, to pay for 48 laptop computers and the peripheral devices needed to use the equipment as electronic pollbooks (EPBs).

The electronic pollbooks do not change the way voters cast their ballots; Ann Arbor voters will continue to use paper ballots. The electronic pollbooks are expected to make record-keeping at the precinct locations on election day more efficient and to reduce waiting time for voters.

The city had already accepted eight laptops and accessories, which were deployed at eight polling places for the May 8, 2012 election. That pilot program went smoothly, according to a staff memo accompanying the resolution.

An added incentive to the city to participate in the state’s EPB program is that the state will fund 50% of the cost of the maintenance agreements for Ann Arbor’s voting tabulators – if EPBs are implemented in all 48 of the city’s precincts by the Nov. 6, 2012 election. For previous Chronicle coverage of the pilot deployment, see “New Technology for Tech Bond Election.”

Outcome: The council unanimously approved the state grant for electronic pollbooks.

Annexation Rezonings

The council considered final approval for six separate rezoning requests associated with annexation into the city of Ann Arbor from Scio Township. The zoning change in all cases is from the township to a residential category. The requests had received initial approval at the council’s April 16 meeting.

Five of the properties were annexed into the city on Oct. 3, 2011 – in connection with the expansion of a well-prohibition zone due to 1,4 dioxane groundwater contamination caused by the Pall Corp.’s Wagner Road facility, formerly owned by Gelman Sciences. Those five properties are: 305 Pinewood St.; 3225 Dexter Rd.; 427 Barber Ave.; 545 Allison Dr.; and 3249 Dexter Rd.

Annexation into the city allows the properties to connect to city of Ann Arbor water services. Pall has paid all petition filing fees as well as the connection and improvement charges for water and sanitary sewer service that are related to the annexations. The zoning for which the city council gave final approval is for R1C. [Google map of well prohibition zones and property locations] [.jpg of map with well prohibition zones and property locations]

A sixth parcel for which the council considered final rezoning approval – also due to annexation, but not related to the well-prohibition zone – is located at 1575 Alexandra Blvd. The parcel was rezoned from the township to R1A zoning.

No one spoke at any of the individual public hearings on any of the rezoning resolutions. The council did not deliberate on any of the parcels.

Outcome: On separate votes, the council unanimously approved the six rezoning resolutions.

Sidewalk Repair Ordinance

The council gave initial consideration to a revision of the city’s sidewalk repair ordinance – in light of the voter-approved sidewalk repair millage, passed in November 2011. The basic idea is that for the period of the authorized millage – through fiscal year 2016 (which ends June 30, 2017) property owners will not be responsible for repairs to sidewalks abutting the property on which they pay taxes.

There are various wrinkles and contingencies in the revised ordinance for properties located within the Ann Arbor Downtown Development Authority tax increment finance (TIF) district.

Ann Arbor voters authorized an additional 0.125 mill to be levied as part of the street repair millage, which was also renewed at that November 2011 election for 2.0 mills, for a total of 2.125 mills.

As part of the resolution passed by the city council to place the sidewalk millage question on the November 2011 ballot, the council directed the city attorney and other staff to provide the ordinance revision for the council’s consideration on or before Dec. 1, 2011. There was no comment at the council table about why the revision came to the council nearly half a year after the date specified.

Christopher Taylor (Ward 3) introduced the ordinance, and described the rationale for the part that deals with the DDA district. He said that because the DDA captures a certain amount of millage monies, the DDA was taking responsibility for repair of sidewalks in the DDA district. But on further reflection, the DDA had insufficient experience with the inspection and repair program, so DDA staff had worked with the city on a plan to have the city perform the repairs and have the DDA fund those repairs with a portion of the millage.

Outcome: The council voted unanimously to give initial approval to the sidewalk repair ordinance. As with all ordinance revisions, the council will need to vote a second time at a subsequent meeting, following a public hearing, in order for the ordinance to take effect.

Communications and Comment

Comm/Comm: R4C/R2A Report

Tony Derezinski (Ward 2) alerted his colleagues to the fact that a report from the advisory committee that studied the R4C/R2A zoning areas of the city has been referred to the planning commission’s ordinance review committee. The report is available on the planning commission website, he said. He noted that there are a lot of different views on it. [Derezinski is the city council's representative to the planning commission. For a detailed overview of the R4C/R2A report, see Chronicle coverage of the May 8, 2012 planning commission working session.]

Comm/Comm: Human Rights

Thomas Partridge introduced himself as an advocate for everyone needing vital services. He told the council he is on the Democratic primary ballot for Michigan house of representatives, District 53. [The seat is currently held by Democrat Jeff Irwin.] Partridge said he was there to advance the cause of human rights and disability rights. He called for full funding of housing and human services in Ann Arbor. He called on the council to take an integrated approach, instead of a segregationist approach, and to do away with the old-boy network, and backroom decision making.

Comm/Comm: Smart Meters

Nanci Gerler updated the council on DTE smart meter installation. She reported that the Ypsilanti Township board had voted to enact a moratorium – because the board felt an opt-out provision was necessary. She told the council that citizens as well as representatives for DTE had spoken. She wanted the council to take action and let DTE know there’s a large number of people who will be affected by smart meter installation.

Helen Slomovits introduced herself as a resident of Ann Arbor. The benefits and safety of the devices are being misrepresented by utility companies, she contended. She urged the council to enact a moratorium on smart meter installation. The devices allow for time-of-day billing. She contended the devices don’t save energy or save customers money. In fact, she contended, they cause electric bills to go higher. She also contended that the meters are an invasion of privacy, because they collect more information than necessary. The utility companies also misrepresent the amount of RF radiation the meters give off. The data transmissions might be few per day, but because the devices are part of a mesh network there are about 10,000 transmissions a day to keep the network going, she said.

Responding later to the public commentary on smart meters, Jane Lumm (Ward 2) noted that smart meters are on the agenda for the next environmental commission meeting. Mayor John Hieftje remarked that most communities aren’t fortunate enough to have an environmental commission.

Comm/Comm: Energy Farms

Kermit Schlansker spoke to the council about the challenges to achieving sustainable living. He described the inherent geometric advantages to bigger buildings – a better surface-area-to-volume ratio. He described a range of different energy systems, including solar systems, windmills, bio-digesters, and thermal reservoirs.

Present: Jane Lumm, Mike Anglin, Margie Teall, Sabra Briere, Sandi Smith, Tony Derezinski, Stephen Kunselman, Marcia Higgins, John Hieftje, Christopher Taylor, Carsten Hohnke.

Next council meeting: Monday, June 4, 2012 at 7 p.m. in the council chambers at 301 E. Huron. [confirm date]

The Chronicle could not survive without regular voluntary subscriptions to support our coverage of public bodies like the Ann Arbor city council. Click this link for details: Subscribe to The Chronicle. And if you’re already supporting us, please encourage your friends, neighbors and colleagues to help support The Chronicle, too!

Preschool, Gas Station Expansions Approved

Mary Morgan — Sat, 21 Apr 2012 18:54:30 +0000

Ann Arbor planning commission meeting (April 17, 2012): Action items at the recent planning commission meeting were dispatched with relative speed – the session lasted less than an hour.

Eric Mahler, chair of the Ann Arbor planning commission. (Photos by the writer.)

Approval was given for (1) zoning changes allowing an expansion of the Shell station’s retail store at Ann Arbor-Saline and West Eisenhower Parkway, (2) a site plan and special exception use for the Allen Creek Preschool, located at 2350 Miller Ave.; and (3) a slight revision to the special exception use for the Michigan Alpha Chapter of Sigma Phi Epsilon house at Tappan and Hill – increasing by one the number of beds allowed at the fraternity.

The brevity of recent planning commission meetings will be offset by packed agendas anticipated in May. The May 1 agenda items will likely include: (1) review of a possible revision to the city’s medical marijuana zoning ordinance, as directed by city council at their April 2 meeting; (2) update of the city’s capital improvements plan (CIP); (3) a master plan review; and (4) reconsideration of the Maple Cove project, after it was discovered that notices hadn’t been mailed out to all nearby residents for the previous planning commission meeting.

Two other major items that have been in the works since 2009 will be making their way back to planning commissioners soon. A draft report from the R4C/R2A zoning district advisory committee is nearly completed and might be reviewed as soon as the commission’s May 8 working session. Also, a consultant’s report on a zoning ordinance reorganization effort known as ZORO will be presented to planning commissioners in the coming weeks. Rampson told commissioners that the consultant described Ann Arbor’s current zoning ordinances as some of the worst he’s seen – complex, convoluted, and conflicting.

After being briefed on upcoming topics at an April 10 working session, planning commission chair Eric Mahler quipped, “The days of the marathon meetings are back.” Commissioner Diane Giannola gave this advice to the newer commissioners: “Come prepared with snacks.”

At least one new member will be joining the commission this summer. Following the April 17 regular meeting, commissioner Erica Briggs told The Chronicle that because of other time commitments, she would not be seeking reappointment when her term ends this July. She said she wanted to alert others who might be interested in applying for the position.

Shell Station

The Ann Arbor planning commission was asked to consider a request from owners of the Shell service station at the northeast corner of Ann Arbor-Saline and West Eisenhower Parkway – to revise the zoning regulations associated with the parcel.

According to a staff memo, the PUD revisions were recommended because they are seen as providing an overall benefit to the city, by: (1) supporting the continued viability of retail options for the surrounding neighborhood; (2) creating job opportunities from this expansion; and (3) controlling the architectural design standards of this building as a gateway into the city.

The commission had postponed action on this item at its March 6, 2012 meeting. Planning staff had recommended postponement because additional information and analysis was required. That information was provided, and planning staff recommended approval at the April 17 meeting.

Shell Station: Public Hearing

Brad Cousino, the project engineer for this expansion, spoke briefly at the public hearing. He noted that the owner and the owner’s family were at the meeting, and everyone was glad that the planning staff had recommended approval.

Shell Station: Commission Discussion

Bonnie Bona referred to a letter from the owner that responded to various concerns, including one that she had highlighted at previous meetings regarding outdoor sales. The letter had indicated that there would be no outdoor sales in front of the building after the addition is completed, she said. Currently, there are ice coolers and propane tanks on the front sidewalk. Bona said her intent was not to require that those items be removed completely, but that the sidewalk should not be obstructed.

From left: Planning commissioners Diane Giannola and Erica Briggs. Terms for both commissioners end in July, and Briggs has announced her intent not to seek reappointment.

The station’s owner, Abe Ajrouch, told commissioners that the reason those items are located outside is because the current store is so small. Bona replied that she wasn’t sure he’d want to have the propane tanks inside the store, even if there was room. She asked staff whether the PUD’s supplemental regulations could include a statement indicating that there won’t be outdoor sales in certain areas, to ensure a clear pedestrian walkway.

Bona said she wasn’t trying to be rigid, but this location is a gateway to the city. Having that merchandise located outside on the side of the building wouldn’t be a big deal – it’s the front that’s more important, she said. Bona added that this was one of the nicest designs she’s seen for a gas station.

Ajrouch said his intent was not to simply make it the best gas station in Ann Arbor, but maybe in all of Michigan.

Erica Briggs raised the issue of vehicle access between the site and Cranbrook Shopping Center – at previous meetings, she has expressed interest in finding a way to make that happen. City planner Chris Cheng explained that because of a severe grade change between the Shell site and Cranbrook, a cut-through wouldn’t be possible.

Outcome: Commissioners voted unanimously to recommend approval of revisions to the Shell station’s planned unit development (PUD) zoning. The request will next be considered by city council.

Allen Creek Preschool

The planning commission considered a site plan for the Allen Creek Preschool, located at 2350 Miller Ave., as well as a special exception use for the project.

Aerial map of Allen Creek Preschool site provided in the April 17 meeting packet. The large east-west road in this image is Miller Avenue. (Links to .pdf of larger map)

The special exception use is required because the project is located on a site zoned R1C (single-family dwelling district). According to a staff memo, the preschool includes programs for children up to 5 years old, with one or two afternoon enrichment classes serving children up to 8 years old. The programs will have a maximum of 14 students each (with 8 for young children attending with their parents) and one or two staff members teaching the programs. The preschool programs will be held mornings on Mondays through Thursdays, with enrichment classes held in the late afternoons. Hours of operation would be limited to between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. on weekdays. The number of children at the preschool will increase from 25 to 42, with a maximum of 50 permitted.

Before building permits are issued, the preschool will be required to pay $257.74 into the city’s street tree escrow, based on the site’s street frontage.

In December 2010, the commission had previously granted special exception use and recommended site plan approval for a project proposed by the preschool at a different location. That plan had called for demolishing an existing building and constructing a new 1,101-square-foot preschool building in a residentially zoned district at 1515 Franklin St. The preschool subsequently decided to pursue a different project.

The only person who spoke during a public hearing was Mark Pascoe, a senior project manager with Stantec, saying he was available for questions.

Allen Creek Preschool: Commission Discussion

Tony Derezinski asked where the nearby vacant gas station was located, in relation to the preschool. It’s at the corner of Miller and Maple, city planner Chris Cheng replied, west of the preschool. Did that pose any hazards for the children? Derezinski asked. Cheng indicated that he wasn’t aware of any possible hazards – the properties are separated by a chain-link fence.

From left: Chris Cheng of the city's planning staff talks with Mark Pascoe, a senior project manager with Stantec, who's working on the Allen Creek Preschool project.

Wendy Rampson, the city’s planning manager, reported that the city has received an application for a new Speedway gas station at that location. The plan – which she said wasn’t yet ready for consideration by the planning commission – calls for tearing down the existing station and building a new one.

Bonnie Bona asked about the parking requirements, in relation to the number of students at the preschool.

Chapter 55 of the Ann Arbor city code (Section 5:10.2) allows child care centers to operate with a special exception use, but with certain conditions. As described in a planning staff memo, the parcel must have a minimum of 7,500 square feet of gross lot area, one off-street parking space for each caregiver required to staff the facility at its state licensed capacity, and two off-street or on-street parking spaces – plus one additional space for each 20 children, for drop-off and pick-up use within 250 feet of the preschool.

Cheng clarified that the current preschool site has the minimum number of parking spaces for its size (9) plus another eight spaces at the Korean Methodist Church lot, as well as nearby off-site parking on Franklin and Miller.

Diane Giannola asked whether there was a typo in the staff report regarding the hours of operation – a 7 a.m. start time seemed early to her. Andy Boschma, the preschool’s board treasurer, stepped up to the podium to answer Giannola’s question. Although no children are at the preschool until 9 a.m., staff could be there as early as 7. Most of the classes are held in the morning, but there is also an enrichment program that runs in the late afternoon for children who are 6-7 years old.

Wendy Woods asked about the parcel of public land that’s located east of the preschool site, at the corner of Franklin and Miller. That’s a small neighborhood “pocket” park, Cheng said.

Outcome: Commissioners unanimously recommended approval of the site plan, and unanimously voted to grant the special exception use. The site plan (but not the special exception use) also requires approval by the city council.

Sigma Phi Epsilon Special Exception Use

The Michigan Alpha Chapter of Sigma Phi Epsilon was requesting a slight revision to its special exception use – increasing by one the number of beds allowed in its house at 730 Tappan. The change would allow for 45 beds, including an additional separate bedroom for the required in-house manager.

The commission had granted the original special exception use more than a year ago, at its March 1, 2011 meeting. That had allowed the fraternity to convert a church at the northwest corner of Tappan and Hill into a fraternity house. The building previously had been the home of the Memorial Christian Church, which is now located at 5141 Platt Road. The fraternity didn’t acquire the property until earlier this year, and began interior renovations in March 2012.

The site is zoned R4C (multi-family dwelling district), which allows for fraternities if given special exception use approval. Based on the city’s zoning code, a parcel used for a fraternity must have a minimum of 350 square feet per occupant. According to a planning staff memo, this site’s 22,400-square-foot parcel could support up to 64 occupants, if granted permission by the city.

Sigma Phi Epsilon Special Exception Use: Public Hearing

Jonathan Kucera, the project’s architect, was the only person who spoke during a public hearing on the item. He said he was there to represent the owner. The project had been developed based on an assumption that all 44 beds within the house would be income-producing, he said – that is, that the 44 beds would be used by paying members of the fraternity. Realizing that they needed another bed for the required resident manager, the design was altered to add an extra room – but that required a revision to the special exception use that the fraternity was requesting.

Kucera offered to answer any questions from commissioners. There were none.

Outcome: Without discussion, planning commissioners unanimously approved the special exception use revision.

Commissioner Reappointments

After the April 17 meeting, Erica Briggs told The Chronicle that because of other time commitments, she would not be seeking reappointment to the planning commission when her term ends this July. She said she wanted to alert others who might be interested in the position.

From left: Planning commissioners Tony Derezinski and Evan Pratt. Derezinski also represents Ward 2 on Ann Arbor city council.

Candidates for planning commission are nominated by the mayor and confirmed by the city council. Briggs was appointed by mayor John Hieftje in 2009 for a three-year term.

Terms for two other planning commissioners – Diane Giannola and Kirk Westphal – also end in July. Westphal told The Chronicle that he hopes to be reappointed. Giannola said she has not yet given it serious consideration.

Another planning commissioner, Evan Pratt, plans to run for the office of Washtenaw County water resources commissioner. The primary for that office is in August, followed by an election in November. His current term on the planning commission ends June 30, 2013.

May 1 Meeting

Although Tuesday’s meeting was relatively brief – lasting about 45 minutes – commissioners expect a much longer session on May 1, when they face a packed agenda. At an April 10 working session, planning manager Wendy Rampson had briefed commissioners on upcoming meeting agendas, noting that while there’s recently been a quiet period for the group, several major items will be coming their way soon.

For the next regular meeting on May 1, agenda items will likely include: (1) review of a possible revision to the city’s medical marijuana zoning ordinance, as directed by city council at their April 2 meeting; (2) update of the city’s capital improvements plan (CIP); (3) a master plan review; (4) reconsideration of the Maple Cove project; and (5) a site plan and rezoning of the Chalmers Place parking lot.

Two other major items that have been in the works since 2009 will be making their way back to planning commission soon. A draft report of from the R4C/R2A zoning district advisory committee is nearly completed and might be reviewed as soon as the commission’s May 8 working session. Also, a consultant’s report on a zoning ordinance reorganization effort known as ZORO will be presented to planning commissioners in the coming weeks. Rampson told commissioners that the consultant described Ann Arbor’s current zoning ordinances as some of the worst he’s seen – complex, convoluted, and conflicting.

After being briefed on upcoming topics at the April 10 working session, planning commission chair Eric Mahler quipped, “The days of the marathon meetings are back.” Commissioner Diane Giannola gave this advice to the newer commissioners: “Come prepared with snacks.”

Present: Eleanore Adenekan, Bonnie Bona, Erica Briggs, Tony Derezinski, Diane Giannola, Eric Mahler, Evan Pratt, Kirk Westphal, Wendy Woods.

Next regular meeting: The planning commission next meets on Tuesday, May 1, 2012 at 7 p.m. in the second-floor council chambers at city hall, 301 E. Huron St., Ann Arbor. [confirm date]

The Chronicle relies in part on regular voluntary subscriptions to support our coverage of public bodies like the city planning commission. If you’re already supporting The Chronicle, please encourage your friends, neighbors and coworkers to do the same. Click this link for details: Subscribe to The Chronicle.

Shell Station PUD Recommended for Approval

Chronicle Staff — Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:04:27 +0000

The Ann Arbor planning commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of a request from owners of the Shell service station at the northeast corner of Ann Arbor-Saline and West Eisenhower Parkway – to revise the zoning regulations associated with the parcel. The vote took place at the commission’s April 17, 2012 meeting.

According to a staff memo, the PUD revisions were recommended because they are seen as providing an overall benefit to the city, by: (1) supporting the continued viability of retail options for the surrounding neighborhood;(2) creating job opportunities from this expansion; and (3) controlling the architectural design standards of this building as a gateway into the city.

This brief was filed from the second floor city council chambers at city hall, 301 E. Huron, where the planning commission holds its meetings. A more detailed report will follow: [link]